• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No.2) [1973] Ch. 9'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case note: 'Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No.2) [1973] Ch. 9' The Court: > 'The Court of Appeal' The Judges: > Sachs, Megaw and Stamp LJJ What are the relevant facts? > 1941 - Bertram Baden (Settlor), Chairman and Managing Director of Matthew Hall & Co Ltd, established trust fund of 5,000 shares in the company for officers and employees of the company. > Clause 9(a) of the deed directed his trustees to: > "Apply the net income of the fund in making at their absolute discretion grants to or for the benefit of any of the officers and employees or ex-officers or ex-employees of the company or to any relatives or dependants of any such persons in such amounts at such times and on such conditions (if any) as they think fit..." > 1943 - Settlor transferred a further 5,000 shares to the trustees and other shares were added later. > 1960 - Settlor dies. > 1962 - Executors told that trusts were void for uncertainty and claimed payment of the fund to his estate. ...read more.

Middle

Result of Appeal by the Executors: The Judges: Sachs LJ: > Executors believe the words "relatives" and "dependants" imports such uncertainty that the trust as a whole is void. > Agrees with the test laid down by Lord Wilberforce in 'Re Gulbenkian's Settlements' - "can it be said with certainty that any given individual is or is not a member of the class?" > The suggestion that this trust could be invalid because it may be impossible to prove an individual was not in the relevant class is wholly incorrect. > Considers trustees capable of coming to a conclusion in any given case as to whether or not a particular candidate could properly be described as "dependant". > Agrees with Brightman J that "the use of the expression 'relatives' cannot clause the slightest difficulty. > Held: Appeal dismissed. Megaw LJ: > Disagrees with suggestion that the inclusion of "relatives" makes this trust so wide to be administratively unworkable. > Agrees with 'Gulbenkian's' test. ...read more.

Conclusion

> On appeal, the Court of Appeal upheld this decision, but held that Goff J had used the incorrect test of validity - the correct test was used in 'Re Gulbenkian's Settlements' and so the case was given to the Chancery Division to consider the validity of the clause. > Executors appealed to the House of Lords who reversed the Court of Appeal decision stating that clause 9(a) was a trust and again remitted the case to the Chancery Division. > During this hearing, it was decided that the test in 'Inland Revenue Commissioners v Broadway Cottages Trust [1955] Ch. 20' no longer applied and instead, the test mentioned earlier in 'Re Gulbenkian's Settlements' was to be utilised - accordingly, the clause was valid as a trust. > The executors' next appeal was dismissed using the above test. > As to the validity of a discretionary trust, you must distinguish between conceptual certainty and evidential difficulty - if an individual could not establish that he was a member, then he must not be a member. > There was no conceptual uncertainty regarding the words "dependants" or "relatives" and so the trust was valid. Word Count: 1,012 words 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Equity & Trust Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Equity & Trust Law essays

  1. The central issue is the "complete constitution of voluntary trusts".

    Rowena will not acquire ownership of the IT despite the authority to use the CT. The vesting of legal title has not been placed within Rowena's control38. Thus Jeremy has not done everything which is necessary to affect a transfer, in equity, of Iconia to Rowena39.

  2. Equity Case Summaries

    Special position of beneficiaries under a Trust Only postponed if B engages in PC B's interest not postponed due to abuse of position however maybe postponed if holder of later equitable interest assumes interest due to conduct of beneficiary Shropshire Union Railways and Canal Company v.

  1. Express Trusts

    The test for this was laid down by Lord Langdale MR in Knight v Knight3 as follows: "First, if the words are so used, that upon the whole, they ought to be construed as imperative; secondly, if the subject of the recommendation or wish be certain; and, thirdly, if the

  2. Charitable trusts, what gives them charitable status?

    Advancement of education The preamble to the Act 1601 refers to, 'schools of learning, free schools, scholars in universities', but in more recent times this scope of education activities has become considerably wide. It now includes nurseries, adult education centres, societies dedicated to promoting training.

  1. Constitution Of Trusts Problem Question - in order to decide whether Nixon is entitled ...

    In general, an oral declaration of trust is valid and effective to create a fully constituted trust even if no consideration was given7. Clearly, Nixon's self-declaration will be sufficient as there is no evidence to suggest that his intention was not to become a trustee.

  2. Are trustees too powerful?

    It is evident that trustees are given power over the trust funds, as they are seen as gatekeepers and protectors who over look over ones assets, and hold it for the overall benefit of the beneficiaries. Powers can therefore be described as "authority given to a person either by instrument

  1. “The Insolvency Act 1986 gives the court the power to set aside trusts which ...

    These types of trust have existed long before Barclays bank v Quistclose a good example of this being Toovey v Milne1. All the House of Lords did in Barclays bank v Quistclose is confirm that such arrangements could create a valid trust2.

  2. The Development of Equity and Trusts

    the King said that if equity and the common law were ever to conflict then equity would succeed, therefore the quote by Lord Ellesmere above explains this. It is very important to know that equity is a method that?s not able to work independently because it works as an add-on towards existing issues inside the common law.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work