• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Response to Stimulus Test, The law and society, renting and buying a dwelling.

Extracts from this document...


Ben Walker Mrs. Reynolds. Year 12 Legal Studies, Response to Stimulus Test, The law and society, renting and buying a dwelling. Dear Daniel, I have been recently notified of your problems with your rental house and offer my legal knowledge to assist you further. Firstly the rent of $150 seems reasonable, yet asking for a bond of $900 dollars is not. The residential tenancies act, on which most of my advice will be based, states that the bond arranged at the start of the lease term can only be four times your weekly rent. The bond you should have been asked to pay should have been in the amount of $600 dollars. The property owner in this case has broken part of the act and mediation over this should be called upon and if this is not successful, you can file a case with the small claims tribunal and maybe claim a small part of your bond back. A receipt should have been given to you by the Property owner for your payment of the bond, and you should also receive a receipt for any rental payments you make. ...read more.


If no action was taken, you can ask for mediation, which will often help. At $20 it is much cheaper than going to the Small Claims Tribunal, but if the mediation doesn't help, the SCT may be your only option. You stated that during a party, the property was damaged. This included the rip in the couch getting bigger and a smashed window. Unfortunately for you, fixing these problems is not a responsibility of the Property Owner. Considering your guests did the damage, and it is your name listed in the lease, it is your responsibility to fix the window. Seeing that you had listed the couch as originally having a rip, you could ask the property owner to assist in some of the repairs for this item. The storm the following day damaged a rug owned by you and existing carpets, due to the leak in the roof. You originally informed the Property owner of this problem so legally it is the property owner's responsibility to fix the leak and to also pay you compensation to account for the repair cost of the rug and damaged carpets. ...read more.


The Property owner, though has no right to tell you to immediately move. The process is much more complicated. First the Owner must give you a notice to remedy breach, which in this case is the window. If you as the tenant do not fix this problem within fourteen days, the property owner can give you a notice to leave. The notice to leave will state a handover day, which is the day on which you must leave the property. If your refuse once again to leave, the Property owner will go to the Small claims tribunal within two weeks of turnover day, to try to gain a termination order. A police person will then claim the property within three days, if the termination order is obtained. The fact that the property owner blames you for the carpets cannot be proven, as that damage was a fault of her own. Hopefully the information given is sufficient to help you through your current situation. Yours sincerely, Ben Walker Walker.B ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Land Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Land Law essays

  1. Property Law - Problem Question

    a, symbolic, presence of inanimate objects ; this was accepted to some extent in Chhokar v Chhokar (1984) FLR 313. The main obstacle in this would however be length of the time O planned to spend away form the property (2 years); while uninterrupted presence is not necessary, fleeting presence will not be enough.

  2. Property law: Land Law.

    loss of value or inconvenience that may not necessarily be on the basis of rent 3. discomfort, loss of enjoyment and ill-health caused by noise, dust and general distress 4. any cost of repairs to internal decorations carried out by the tenant 5.

  1. Land Law

    Equitable rights are the same but they do not bind "a bona fide purchaser of the legal estate in the land for value without notice", known as the doctrine of notice. Basically it describes a purchaser of a "legal estate" with "clean hands".

  2. Registration of land

    example when the preconditions for overreaching based on statutes can't be met, the purchaser will be dealt with a lot of hassle. The leading case for this is Williams and Glyn's Bank v Boland20 where the bank whom failed to identify that the borrower's wife's rights weighed greater priority over the bank's mortgage.

  1. Tenancy case question. The problem faced by Linda is whether or not Terry, Tina ...

    denote that even though the agreement was primarily established to represent a licence it can still become a lease. Although Lord Templeman outlined the main criteria for a valid lease to be present in Street v Mountford, exclusive possession may still have been granted without amounting to any form of tenancy.

  2. Property Law

    In D'Eyncourt v Gregory (1866)7 the court looked at the purpose of annexation and stated that the items had become an integral part of the garden and could not be removed by the sellers. In Whaley v Roehrich [1908]8 items had been fixed to the wall to form an Elizabethan

  1. The Doctrine of Notice

    generally, there will be equitable interest(s) associated with that title for which the owner (or future purchaser) of the title requires (or would at least like to have) notification of. An 'equitable interest' is a right 'in personam' [Latin: directed towards a particular person] which can enforced, if considered fair.

  2. Land law problem question - access

    As in Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust[53] the House of Lords[54] have upheld the existence of contractual, non-proprietary leases.[55] Hence it is important to distinguish a âterm of years absoluteâ (a lease) which carries a proprietary interest, from the other interests, most commonly, licence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work