• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Right to Silence. The privilege against right to silence and self-incrimination go hand in hand. They are also very closely related to the presumption of innocence. As the responsibility is placed on the prosecution to prove the guilt of a person it follo

Extracts from this document...


Right to Silence: Criminal Law The privilege against right to silence and self-incrimination go hand in hand. They are also very closely related to the presumption of innocence. As the responsibility is placed on the prosecution to prove the guilt of a person it follows that the accused should not be forced to assist the prosecution by being forced to speak. First of all I will look at the right to silence at the pre-trial stage that is while a crime is being investigated, but before a person has been charged with that crime. However at common law, it was clear that suspects enjoyed a right to refuse to answer police questions. Whereas recent legislation has increasingly tended to require answers to be given in specific circumstances, or allow the court to draw an adverse inference from the failure to give answers. However it is important to note that, where no such legislation has been enacted, then the right to silence remains available. An example of this can be seen in People (DPP) v Finnerty1. Where the defendant was accused of rape and put forward an alternative account of the events on the night in question. In response the prosecution sought to put it to the defendant that he had not given any such account when arrested and questioned. The trial judge allowed the prosecution to question the defendant on his silence when arrested and the defendant was therefore convicted. ...read more.


Also a person cannot be charged with a crime unless that crime is one recognised in law. In particular it is necessary that the charges against a person relate to a specific activity that is expressly deemed in Law to be illegal. "As with the privilege against self-incrimination, the common law recognised it as a right against double jeopardy. Thus in bar of a trial on indictment one could plead in appropriate circumstances a prior acquittal or conviction, of the offence changed; a similar rule applied in regard to summary prosecutions."9 "The privilege against self-incrimination, which provides for a right to silence and a right not to incriminate oneself, lies at the heart of a fair criminal procedure and underlies the legal principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty."10 The right to silence and privilege against self-incrimination in Ireland is not an absolute right. However, in the vast majority of criminal offences this right does apply. When you are accused of a criminal offence you enjoy the right to silence unless you are informed by the Garda� that the particular offence for which you are arrested places a certain obligation on you. The Garda� must also inform you of the consequences if you fail to comply. There is also a Constitutional guarantee, that every person accused of a criminal offence in Ireland is innocent until proven guilty. ...read more.


In O'Leary v Attorney General13, the plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of two sections of the offences Against the State Act 1939, which provided that the possession of an "incriminating document," would be evidence of a membership of an unlawful organisation as it would be the belief of a chief superintendent to this effect. The plaintiff claimed that the effect of these sections was to reverse the presumption of innocence, requiring him to prove that he was a member of an unlawful organisation. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, however, holding that these sections provide for evidence of membership, but not proof of membership. As we have seen, the legislation aimed to limit the instances in which a defendant could remain silent in the face of police questioning by ensuring that this would be brought to the attention of the court. There were good reasons for this; a guilty person should not be able to hide behind silence to avoid the consequences of his actions and an innocent person should speak out so that he can be eliminated from the police enquiry so that the true offender can be found. It is in the interests of society that the police must have sufficient powers to investigate offences and the law should reflect this by ensuring that all persons must cooperate fully by answering questions put to them by the police. There is so much to favour this position that this is surely an instance in which the rights of the suspect should be trumped by the interests of society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Freedom of Expression

    3 star(s)

    Sexism. Every sort of discrimination, and "ism" imaginable. Virtually no one would suggest that those forms of crude discrimination deserve to be protected; why should one entire race be discriminated against? Why one entire gender? Why, then, should an entire company be called incompetent based on a disagreement with one man?

  2. Law of Rape

    expressly covered by statutory definition, but the weight of authority supports treating the continuation of sexual intercourse as satisfying the physical act required for a charge of rape. This was the interpretation of the definition of sexual intercourse in the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA).53 Similarly in New Zealand,

  1. The criminal trial at common law takes seriously safeguards for the right of the ...

    In the speech above, Viscount Sankey in Woolmington v. DPP, he made us understand that the whole burden of prove lies with the prosecutor as they must prove that the accused is capable of committing the crime both his mental and physical status must be prove.

  2. The law does not prohibit a suspect from confessing to a crime. It does ...

    This was seen in the case of Heaney v. Ireland1. Here the defendants were required to give a full account of their movements and whereabouts at a certain time as required under section 52 of the Offences against the State Act 1939.

  1. Physical Resistance in Rape

    Thus, it is uncertain as to what extent consent may be regarded as absent when the defendant uses neither violence nor the threat of it. It is unclear as to the degree of consent required with respect to children or those of subnormal intelligence.

  2. Free essay

    Two of the keystones of our right to a fair trial, the right to ...

    The right to silence in court forms a guarantor of the presumption of innocence in that it forces the burden of proof fully onto the prosecution to base its case on solid evidence rather than to either trick, intimidate or confuse the accused into incriminating themselves through oppression4 or making contradictory statements that undermine their credibility5.

  1. Should Female Genital Mutilation (hereinafter referred to as FGM) be considered a criminal offence? ...

    Although many of the Muslim society practise FGM as part of their tradition and religious practise, it was not true as Islamic law allows and protects women's sexual enjoyment.6 Islamic law which allows woman to seek divorce because of the inability of the husband to provide sexual satisfaction7 proves that sexual enjoyment by woman is equally recognised as men.

  2. This essay will discuss the similarities between the Irish and UK legislation on assisted ...

    Switzerland is the only country to allow non-residents to avail of their assisted suicide services. Private organisations such as EXIT and Dignitas can legally provide non Swiss nationals with the service as long as they are not providing it for selfish reasons.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work