• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should the jury trial be abolished?

Extracts from this document...


Should the jury trial be abolished? Introduction In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not be abolished, we need to know what it is that we are dealing with and what viable alternative or alternatives there are to it. I will take a brief look at the history of the jury trial. I will examine the function of the jury and look at what is good and bad about the jury system. Finally I will examine the proposed alternatives to trial by jury that are currently in fashion. Background The jury system first arrived in Britain after the Norman Conquest. The earliest jury was a body of neighbours summoned by a public officer to give oath as answer to some question. The sworn inquest was used to enable the recognition on oath of a number of upstanding members of the community to testify to facts which they had personal knowledge. Those called were not judges of fact, but witnesses. By the end of the twelfth century, a person accused of a crime could, on payment obtain the right to obtain a trial by jury. However, this was abolished in 1215 and a need arouse to find a new method to establish guilt. ...read more.


However, the question asked was whether or not we should abolish it? In order to be able to make a judgement it is only fair that we look to the possible alternatives to try to evaluate whether they would represent an improvement on our present system. One option to consider would be to use the inquisotorial system as used in many parts of the world. The advantage of using a single judge could be that the problem of perverse verdicts would be greatly reduced. We could expect judges to assess evidence rationally, and with intelligence and understanding juries are likely to be swayed by irrational factors, such as emotion, prejudice and rhetoric. Judges on the other hand, would be likely to base their verdicts on a dispassionate appraisal of the evidence. Also jury trails can be expensive and slow. Trail by investigating judges would result in not just more reasoned verdicts, but also quicker verdicts. Nevertheless, although judges are supposed to be independent, there would always be the suspicion that they were acting as agents of the government. However, the key benefit of the jury system is public participation and all that it brings with it. ...read more.


Jurors may have difficulty in understanding a fraud case. The Roskill Committee in 1986 recommended abolishing juries for complex fraud cases. Other Disadvatages Jury nobbling. Slow trials. Expensive. Conclusion One cannot get away from the fact that jury trial is expensive, when compared to Magistrates trials. In 1997-98 a trial day cost �8,700 at crown court and only �500 at a Magistrates court. None of our public services have bottomless budgets and the savings that could potentially be made by abolishing the jury system are substantial. However I feel that the alternatives to the jury system proposed all have major flaws, some of which could adversely affect the perception of our criminal justice system as being overall a fair and just system. I feel that we should keep trial by jury and implement reforms that ensure that it becomes an even fairer and more representative system. Bibligraphy David M. Walker The Oxford Companion To Law (1980) p 686. British Criminal Statistics Source www.criminal-justice-system.gov.uk [1]www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/ Chapter 5 Juries Jury Excusal and Deferral, Research Findings No. 102, Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate [2]www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/ Chapter 5 Juries Para 16 [3]www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/ Chapter 5 Juries Para 26 [4]www.criminal-courts-review.org.uk/ Chapter 5 Juries Para 27 The Jury at Work (1972) [5]www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-023.pdf Page 18-19 British Criminal Statistics By Tom Walkins Source www.criminal-justice-system.gov.uk [6]www.warwick.ac.uk/news/pr/law/191 Criminal Justice (Mode of Trial) Bill Briefing Note [7]www.homeoffice.gov.uk/motbrief.htm [8]www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2002/rp02-073. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Development of Jury

    being the equals or the peers of the parties litigant...... Its establishment however and use in this island, of what date so-ever it be, though for a time greatly impaired and shaken by the introduction of the Norman trial by battle, was always so highly esteemed and valued by the

  2. the jury

    modern jury trials, jurors decided not only whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty, but they had the third choice: "Guilty, but not to be punished", since Alexander II believed that justice without morality is wrong. In Jury Deliberations and Verdict, after the judge has finished instructing the jury, the jury retires to the jury room to begin deliberations.

  1. An Intangible Obsession- An Essay of Kafka's The Trial

    indirectly causes the pain and torture of two warders from his statements in the courtroom. Moreover, the irony behind the situation is that the warders also causes the pain for K. K. is extremely empathetic because he feels responsible for the circumstance the warders were in, "I had no

  2. Should Tribunals be Abolished, Reformed or are they a Desirable Means of Resolving Disputes?

    The tribunals were formed against a common law background which had not succeeded in affording any substantive or procedural rights to the individual aliens. The discretion regarding immigration decisions was consequently transferred from the Home Secretary to the immigration appeal tribunal.

  1. 'It is simply unrealistic to think that juries are capable of dealing with long ...

    and also some cases where there is danger of jury tampering (s.44). Under s.43, in cases of serious or complex fraud, the prosecution may apply to a judge of the Crown Court for the trial to be conducted without a jury.

  2. Law of Evidence

    freely used in rape trials, it scarcely made sense to leave it to them to decide whether and when to exclude it."20 McColgan has argued that the body of appellate decisions on the application of section 2 suggests that the refusal to admit evidence of the complainant's sexual history will


    fact, made by a party to proceedings or by his agent expressly or impliedly authorized by him to make such a statement. Going by the above definitions, it can be said that save for formal admissions, all other admissions, are subject to corroboration in order to form a basis of

  2. Identify the most significant roles performed by the trial judge.

    As the prosecution bears the burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt, this would require the judge to clarify the standard of proof (Edwards (1975)[21]). However, it is important for the judge not to confuse the jury with complicated analysis, ?Summing up should contain only such directions on the law as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work