• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

"Sir Thomas Maitland is historically considered 'an autocratic ruler'. However, he is known for his important legislative reforms. Comment."

Extracts from this document...


January 2004 "Sir Thomas Maitland is historically considered 'an autocratic ruler'. However, he is known for his important legislative reforms. Comment." INDEX Page Introduction 3 The Maitland Instructions (an overview of the legal overhaul) 3 Malta : A Colony in the grip of Plague 4 Reform of the Law Courts and Education System 5 Subsidiary legal reforms Commission of Piracy 7 Law of Organisation and Civil Procedure 7 Bankruptcy 8 Public Registry and the Hypothecary System 8 Mortmain Law 8 Sanctuary 8 Appeals to the Privy Council 8 Conclusion 9 ~ A lso known as 'King Tom', Sir Thomas Maitland is the only Mediterranean statesman in English history. He was the embodiment of England's power in the Mediterranean, and as his biographer1 upheld in the book "Sir Thomas Maitland"2, he was "...with one foot in Malta...and the other in Corfu, King Tom stood out as the visible embodiment of a Pax Brittanica. He bestrode the Mediterranean like a Colossus.". People living under his domain viewed him as a quarrelsome and ruthless governor, but in spite of this, with the passage of time and subsiding of feelings, a more objective analysis shows that Maitland was a man who, with consummate ability, laid the foundations of Malta's institutions, suppressed abuses and enacted reforms which only a capable, energetic person, who had dynamic energy and absolute fearlessness could effect. The Maitland Instructions; Lord Bathurst3, commented that "...since the Island of Malta and its Dependencies came under the protection and Dominion of His Majesty in the year 1800, no permanent or definite system has been laid down for their Government...". ...read more.


Later in 1822, the Halls were reduced to two in number in virtue of the Proclamation of the 25th of January of 1822. On judge sat in the Criminal Court without a jury in cases where the punishment provided by law does not exceed a fine of 100 scudi or imprisonment for three years. In other trials, the judges consisted of two, and in case of a stalemate, the Governor appointed three judges of members of the Supreme Court of Justice and, these, after consultation with the first two judges, proceeded to decide upon the sentence which was thereupon promulgated by one of the Criminal Judges in open Court. During any Criminal trial, torture was prohibited, and legislation made it impossible for the Police or a Court to detain any prisoner without accusation of the knowledge of the Government for any length of time. There was no appeal from the decisions of the Criminal Court but a High Court of Appeal divided into two Halls, was instituted to hear appeals from the Commercial and Civil Courts. The first Hall, consisting of the President, of the Civil Judge and of five Consuls of the Commercial Court, unconnected with the cause in the first instance, took cognisance in the first instance, took cognisance of all appeals from the Commercial Court whilst the Second Hall and on of the Criminal Judges by rotation, took cognisance of all appeals from the Civil Court. The Supreme Council of Justice mentioned earlier took appeals in cases of evident injustice and hardship. It would seem that this Supreme Council of Justice gives the Governor, being the head of the executive and the only legislative authority in Malta, the right to interfere in the sentences of the Courts, thus contrary to the principles of the then constitution. ...read more.


A further proclamation12 upheld that only immovable property was to be bound by hypothec, and a Court judgment shall confer to the creditor the right of hypothec upon the immovables of the debtor, from the date of registration. Mortmain Law : Acquisition of property by the Church and other Pious Institutions would have the effect of withdrawing disposable land, and Proclamation 23 of 1822 laid down that no lands or tenements were to be acquired by such institutions except and under the express and positive condition that they be sold or disposed of within one year, in default these fall ipso facto under government control. Sanctuary : In order to remedy certain abuses in the exercise of the right to sanctuary, Proclamation 7 of 1817 laid down that a warrant of arrest could be lawfully executed at any hour, day or night, against any person, who after having taken refuge in the precincts of any church or similar structure, was found beyond the limits of such precinct, except on a Sunday or Holiday of precetto intero. Appeals to the Privy Council: Proclamation 30 of 1822 paved the way for the securing of the right to appeal to all His Majesty's subjects and other individuals resident in Malta, and without any limitations13, which right was granted after 1823. Sir Thomas Maitland died on the seventeenth of January 1824, seized by a fit of apoplexy at the house of his friend Mr. Le Mesurier, at Floriana. On the twenty first of the month he was laid to rest at the Upper Barracca, solemnified by a simple cross which covers the mortal remains of a man who whatever his faults did much for the legislative and social improvement of the Maltese Islands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Juries - an overview.

    It is questionable whether a rule which had significantly curtails the ability of the court to investigate the impropriety of the jury is consider as compatible with Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights which provides that everyone has the right to fair trial.24 Recently, the House of

  2. Evaluate the importance of reforms made to the Criminal Justice System, which were proposed ...

    racist by the victim or any other person" (Macpherson, 1999: recommendation #12). The police failed to recognise the murder as a racist attack despite the fact that all of the victims of the incident - including the family, and Stephen Lawrence's best friend and witness to the murder, Dwayne Brooks - saw the attack as racially motivated.

  1. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    In fact they drew a distinction between active euthanasia (which is unlawful) and the withdrawal of treatment (which may be lawful if the treatment is no longer in the patient's best interests) and granted the declaration sought. Marks & Spencer v One In A Million [1998] 4 All ER 476,

  2. In what senses is devolution asymmetric? Is this sustainable and - if not - ...

    This formula is the one which is used to calculate the grant which Westminster Parliament gives to the Scottish devolved Parliament who has discretion as to the spending of the money. It is for this reason that Scotland has the unusual power to offer social benefits such as free tuition fees for students or improved disability care.

  1. Identify one procedure in the criminal process and critically analyse how the law has ...

    They are also free of violation and be protected by State. If the court grants bail to the defendant or suspect, they may continue to commit the crime, then endangers the society or even threaten the security of the State, such as the terrorist.

  2. Should Tribunals be Abolished, Reformed or are they a Desirable Means of Resolving Disputes?

    In 19733 the Benefit Appeal Tribunals took two to four weeks to be concluded, and rent assessment committees determined outcomes within three months. There can be delays and duration of tribunals can vary. The average layman may have difficulty dealing with complex statutory schemes commonly arising in tribunals and the

  1. The government is proposing to create a supreme court and to reform the judicial ...

    principle of separation of powers in the United Kingdom into the 21st century. This would be done through the removal of Judges' from the legislature, thus establishing the required level of independence and transparency in the judicial system, so to assure the public that the Judiciary is not politically influence.

  2. Effectiveness Of The Woolf Report Reforms.

    the most significant probably being the fact that there are no policies of precedent. No guidelines are provided for future cases due to each case�s judgment being based on its intrinsic rights and wrongs. Decisions may prove difficult to enforce, as the courts do not make them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work