1. 1
  2. 2

"The courts have insisted that no contract (other than a contract under seal) can be enforceable in the absence of consideration."

Extracts from this essay...


"The courts have insisted that no contract (other than a contract under seal) can be enforceable in the absence of consideration." Shears & Stephenson [1996] Under English law, for a simple contract to be valid, there must be 'consideration' from the party accepting the offer. The traditional definition comes from the case of Currie v Misa [1875] where Luch LJ states: 'A valuable consideration in the sense of the law may consist either in some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility, given suffered or undertaken by the other.' The legal meaning of 'consideration' is not very different from the everyday use of term. For example, if it was said, "For a small consideration I will..." it is probably an offering to do something for money. However, the consideration need not be monetary. It need not even be a benefit, i.e.


Consideration might be provided if the creditor agrees to accept: > Part-payment on an earlier date than the due date. > Chattel instead of money. > Part-payment in a different place to that originally specified. Also a promise to accept a smaller sum in full satisfaction will be binding on a creditor where the part-payment is made by a third party on condition that the debtor is released from the obligation to pay the full amount5. A further exception to the rule is to be found in the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel. This is the name given to the equitable doctrine which has as its principal source the obiter dicta of Denning LJ in Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947]. The principle is that if someone makes a promise, which another person acts on, the promisor is stopped, or estopped, from going back on the promise, even though the other person did not provide consideration.


* The promisee must have acted in reliance on the promise. * It must be inequitable for the promisor to go back on his promise and revert to his strict legal rights6. Furthermore, it must be said on the promissory estoppel doctrine is that it cannot be used to found a cause of action; that is, it may not be used in legal proceedings brought to force someone to uphold a promise. It can only be used to prevent someone going back on their promise and insisting on enforcement of their strict right7. It is to be used as a shield, not a sword. Denning LJ states on this matter: '...that principle does not create new causes of action where none existed before...' Thus there is, in the name of equity, a doctrine which makes certain promises enforceable despite the absence of consideration. 1 Dunlop v Selfridge [1915] 2 Tweddle v Atkinson [1861] 3 Chappell & Co v Nestle [1960] 4 Stilk v Myrick [1809] 5 Hirachand Punamchand v Temple [1911] 6 D & C Builders v Rees [1965] 7 Coombe v Coombe [1951] Contract Law

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Contract Law

  1. The Main Requirements of a Simple Legal Binding Contract - Law of Contract.

    For example Oscar Chess v Williams 1959, a private car owner negotiated the part exchange of his old car for a new one. He stated that his car was a 1948 model as this was what the registration book showed, however it was in fact a 1939 model worth significantly less.

  2. Promissory Estoppel is a shield not a sword

    on it, the one who gave the promise or assurance cannot afterwards be allowed to revert to the previous legal relations as if no such promise or assurance had been made by him. He must accept their legal relations subject to the qualification which he himself has so introduced, even

  1. Promissory estoppel and consideration

    the enforcement of a promise, but one for preventing injustice to the promisee by protecting reasonable reliance. Therefore, in situations where there is no consideration yet there is a clear promise, the promisor would not be able to exploit the promisee even though the promise was not part of an exchange.

  2. Explain and comment on the doctrine of consideration contract is not valid without valid ...

    He then refused to pay this money when the ship returned to port. It was held that the sailors were not entitled to the extra money, as they had not done any more than they were already obliged to do.

  1. It has been said that a promise is enforceable once consideration has been provided. ...

    In a case for example where a promise to pay £1 for a business does constitute the provision of sufficient consideration. Such consideration is often described as 'nominal consideration'. As Professor Atiyah has observed, 'a promise for nominal consideration is just about the clearest possible indication that the promisor intended

  2. Promissory Estoppel

    When the parties entered into negotiation of the sale of the property, the suspension of the notice of repair was treated as though it was binding and the promisee has acted upon it by not carry out any repair activities to the premise.

  1. Proprietory estoppel

    For example, in the case of D and C Builders v Rees,31 The court of Appeal held that although there was clearly a promise, which could raise promissory estoppel, the defendants could not do so because it is inequitable for them to rely on the doctrine, by taking advantage on

  2. Discuss the significant features of the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act. Is its ...

    In fact 'the exceptions would certainly seem to outnumber the rule' (Duncan Wallace). This may perhaps indicate the desire found in the judicial consciousness and that of the legislature to mitigate the unfairness or inconvenience of the doctrine of privity.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.