• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The ECJ's primary purpose in creating the concept of direct effect was to ensure the efficient development of the Union, rather than to empower the individual. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The ECJ's primary purpose in creating the concept of direct effect was to ensure the efficient development of the Union, rather than to empower the individual. Discuss. The European Community Treaty was formed for the economic integration between the Member States that can be achieved through their fundamental principles. The Fundamental principles1 are: The free movement of goods, workers, capital and services, The creation of common custom tariff for the regulation and administration of trade between the community and non-community countries, The establishment of common commercial policy for the economic relations between community and rest of the world, and The making of economic policies between the member states for their benefit. When these policies are to be achieved, problems would even start arising between Member States. For solving these problems of the community, European Court of Justice has come into existence. The main purpose of European Court of Justice is: To hear actions between Member states and Community as well as by individuals against the acts of Community institution, It takes into consideration the right of Court to award damages for unlawful acts committed by the Community institutions, and It refers to the cases by national courts of Member States on matter relating to the interpretation and application of the Community law. When a state joins the European Union, all Community law becomes part of its own system. The European Court of Justice2 has developed a concept of direct effect, whereby provision of Community law can confer right on an individual which can directly be applied by National Courts, if required. Art 249 (ex 189) ...read more.

Middle

The duty to implement Directive is absolute: no excuses such as slowness of the legislative process, governmental crisis etc. are brooked by the Court of Justice as potential justification for failure to do so.15 Indeed, non-implementation is a breach not only of the specific provisions of Art 249 of the EC Treaty but also of the duty of Community "solidarity" as enshrined in Art 10 of the EC Treaty. Central to this notion of Solidarity is the protection of individual rights since the non-implementation by a Member State may prejudice the legal position of the individual who finds himself subject to two sets of contradictory rules.16 Art 249 nevertheless confers upon Member State discretion as to the "choice of form and method" with which it implements a Directive into national law. Here the Member States are given the widest possible choice of possibilities as far as implementation of Directive into national law is concerned. Where the directive is intended to create rights for individuals, the legal position arising from these principles is sufficiently precise, clear and transparent and where appropriate those individuals are afforded the possibility of relying on their enforceable rights before the national courts.17 The concept of direct effect is a product of the jurisprudence of the Court and in the context of directives it has been elaborated, at least in recent years, in terms of reflex effect rather in the nature of estoppel - it only occurs when a Member State has failed to perform its obligations, and this cannot be the case until the time limit for the performance of those obligations ...read more.

Conclusion

If the directive was for the benefit of individuals, (2) The content of those rights are identifiable to the directive and (3) If there is a link between the breach of Member States obligation and the damage suffered by the individual. From the above discussion of concept and Judgment of various cases, we can see that European Court of Justice was mainly developed to take care of the European Community Law. When the Community Law was developed it was mainly for the benefit of the Member States. Member States always had the problem between national law and community law. Later on from the case of Costa v. ENEL, it was proved that Community law prevails over the national law i.e. Community Law is supreme. The main purpose of Community law was to make a common market between Member States; they achieved this goal by making Single Market Act. This act developed four free movements: free movement of goods, capital, workers and services. From here the problems did start between individuals and state, as every Member State sometimes interpreted community law in a different manner. ECJ was formed for efficiently running of the European Union. But due to many problems which did occur from community law such as: free movement, misinterpretation of the community law, due to problems with implementing the directives on which people have already started working on, this all caused different problems, therefore ECJ had to start taking more cases concerning the problems of individuals. So that individuals do get proper justice. ECJ do work for the betterment of the European Union and it even gives right to Member State to come with the problem of individuals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree European Union Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree European Union Law essays

  1. The democratic deficit is a concept created by the euro sceptics regarding the European ...

    The Treaty gives them grater scope to participate alongside the European institutions in the work of the Union. A new clause sets out rights and duties of the national parliaments within the EU. Now national parliaments have to contribute to the good functioning of the Union through receiving draft EU

  2. Predatory pricing strategies in the European union: A case for legal reform.

    subsidise their losses with the excessive profits earned in the dominated market. In AKZO, [FN13] a producer operating in the specialty chemicals division with an estimated market share of 50 per cent of the overall European organic peroxides market, engaged in systematic conduct (among others, below-cost pricing, selective price cuts, threats)

  1. Critically evaluate the above statement in the context of EC law making, paying particular ...

    The next institution to be dealt with is the Commission. In an institution of such abstract diversity as exists in the European Union, there needs to be an institution whose primary purpose is not bargaining for better national interests, but battling on behalf of the Union itself, this is the role of the Commission.

  2. EU Freedom of Establishment. In this essay I will discuss the definition of establishment ...

    In Gebhard15 (principles outlined above) which saw the court set out the conditions to be consider by the ECJ. The courts have imposed some limits on this test where the alleged impediment is too remote16. But other cases, for example, prior authorisation for a trade fair17, a language requirement among

  1. Critically evaluate the impact of the E.U. Directive on Copyright in an Information Society, ...

    Cryptographers design and produce many of the measures put into place to protect copyrighted works. In producing these measures, cryptographic algorithms (the concept of which need not be explained here, all that is necessary is the idea of them) are used, as well as a number of known algorithms that

  2. How far has the creation of a single market in goods resulted in the ...

    The ECJ will only allow a service outside the article 25 prohibition if the service is directly beneficial to the traders and the charge is proportionate to the service provided. In the case of Rewe-Zentralfinanz26 it was held that where an inspection service is imposed in the 'general interest' it

  1. EU Law - age discrimination and market access case studies.

    First we will assess the validity of these measures; as B will have to invest more time and money into meeting these requirements, the integration of her products into the French market is hindered. For this reason, these measures satisfy the initial requirement of the Dassonville test.

  2. EU Law - Albatros Pool problem case. Mark and Sunita must be advised that ...

    generally enforceable law, the directive merely dictates the content of that implementing law. Difficulties arise in situations such as the one faced by Mark and Sunita, where directives are improperly transposed or ignored by the implementing national authority. A directive which has not been properly transposed creates legal anomalies in the domestic legal system in question.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work