• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The Human Rights Act 1998 was no doubt intended to strengthen the rule of law but not to inaugurate the rule of lawyers.' (R(Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. Secretary of state for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) Lord Hoffmann. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


'The Human Rights Act 1998 was no doubt intended to strengthen the rule of law but not to inaugurate the rule of lawyers.' (R(Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. Secretary of state for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) Lord Hoffmann. Discuss. In administrative law, has the act had the effect that Lord Hoffmann suggests it was intended to have? What lies behind the concept of 'rule of law' is a debatable issue. So how is one to know what precisely was intended to be strengthened by the introduction of the HRA 1998? In the context of Alconbury , Lord Hoffmann was using the 'rule of law' to symbolise the constitutional order and the role of the courts within it. By contrasting the rule of lawyers, he was meaning to say that the courts are aware that the HRA was not intended to allow them to get politically involved and substitute their own decisions for that of public bodies. This idea of courts upholding the rule of law is reminiscent of the modified ultra vires theoretical justification for judicial review (courts are upholding the rule of law, because that is what Parliament intends). Yet, albeit not intended to give a new constitutional status to the courts, it is questionable how far the powers given to them when reviewing administrative acts and legislation involving human rights were intended to extend. ...read more.


The authority would not be seen as acting incompatibly if that is the way proscribed by primary legislation-s.6 (2). Again courts are bound by Parliament. But could it be said that the new and high standard of review- proportionality impinges somehow on this relationship between the courts and the legislature? The proportionality test is not the first instance of stringency of judicial scrutiny. For example, a heightened test was employed in ex parte Smith. This while more rigorous than the Wednesbury grounds for review, was occupying a medium position in comparison with judicial substitution of judgment, whereby the court imposes what it believes to be the correct meaning of the term or issue for review. Looking at the process of judicial review and the way in which proportionality test applies it could be said that it too is at a medium position in the spectrum of stringency. In case of interference the courts have to decide several things. Firstly, whether there has been a right interfered with and legislation which allows this, then whether there is a legitimate purpose served by this interference. If there is the courts have to determine whether the interference with the right is proportionate. It could be seen that the proportionality inquiry comes rather late in the general enquiry of review. ...read more.


and private bodies (Leonard Cheshire), which may exercise 'public' functions. The borderline between the latter two can be tenuous. It relation to providing accommodation it appears that the two cases above have settled the issue. But what is some other act of public nature is performed by a hybrid public authority. It is what very clear from Lord Woolf's speech in Donoghue when a private act would turn into one which is regarded as public. This is an important point as only the pure and the hybrid public authorise are covered by the new judicial review jurisdiction under the HRA. Oliver has been in favour of a more restricted view of public authority in the 'hybrid' sense, because to classify one as a public authority would deprive them of the benefit of the Act. He is therefore in favour of promoting rights through 'indirect horizontal effect'. This however has not been perceived as the role of the court. From the discussion above it could be seen that the HRA has had considerable implications for administrative law. There is a new ground for judicial review-proportionality and courts have power to review primary and secondary legislation and issue declarations of incompatibility. Whether the intention to fit this new roles of the courts with the existing constitutional order, as Lord Hoffmann contends, succeeds remain to be seen from the rigour which the courts would apply this new rights. As demonstrated above, they have tried to maintain a balance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. Of What Value is Gramsci's Concept of Hegemony to our Understanding of Law Today?

    the need to 'wage' this war after it felt the first hand effect of terrorist attacks (9-11). While its heroic stance may be plausible, America's fight has been undermined by the hegemonic forces which have undoubtedly dictated and shaped the direction of the war itself.

  2. What is the relationship between human rights and poverty?

    They need to be democratic and not representative of elite intersts. Int instruments all gurantee civ/pol neglecting rights of poor. UDHR guarantess freedom of assoc etc, but many groups just beginning to organize and form assoc. Inclusion. This is buliding socially inclusive socierties based on equality and nondiscrim., through development.

  1. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 has imposed a new method of ...

    As pointed out in the White Paper, section 3 should not be limited to "ambiguity" and it should be applied as "read down", namely a word can have more than one meaning. Before this Act, the courts were permitted but did not have to use the convention as an interpretative tool where an Act was ambiguous.

  2. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    In event of recidivism, the maximum penalties shall be doubled. Recidivism is deemed to have occurred within the proceeding five years the offender has been convicted of infringement of a patent. Defences and Limitations of Patent Rights Where a person is sued for patent infringement, may raise one of the following as defence to exculpate himself from liability:- a)

  1. How have law and international institutions sought to promote human rights globally? To what ...

    This was graphically illustrated by the case of Rwanda, 1994. Confusion often arises in texts whereby they confuse decreased tolerance for old forms of repressive rule with support for protective regimes and in extreme cases the institutionalisation of rights. Liberalisation is the process which involves reduced human rights violations and progress in civil and political rights.

  2. Essay on how judges decide cases

    He refers to it as being the rhetorical thrust of a judgment by engaging in argumentation that convinces and connects up the specific issues of the case with the wider realms of human experience. According to Sachs J., there is a compelling need to explore the wider dimensions of the

  1. Ronald Dworkin and his interpretation of natural law and positivism.

    Dworkin's aim in this metaphor is to show that it is almost always possible to reach the decision that justifies the law as a whole. The mythical judge has the ability to weigh up all the social and political issues surrounding a case and still reach the ultimate right, moral answer.

  2. Judicial Review

    2. O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237 3. HL in Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee [1992] 1 AC 624 4. Mercury Communications Ltd v D.G of Telecommunications [1996] 1 All ER 575 5. As explained by Parpworth, Pg 251 (12.20) 6. Leading Case Boddington v British Transport Police [1999] 2 AC 143 As

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work