• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The Human Rights Act 1998 was no doubt intended to strengthen the rule of law but not to inaugurate the rule of lawyers.' (R(Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. Secretary of state for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) Lord Hoffmann. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


'The Human Rights Act 1998 was no doubt intended to strengthen the rule of law but not to inaugurate the rule of lawyers.' (R(Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. Secretary of state for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) Lord Hoffmann. Discuss. In administrative law, has the act had the effect that Lord Hoffmann suggests it was intended to have? What lies behind the concept of 'rule of law' is a debatable issue. So how is one to know what precisely was intended to be strengthened by the introduction of the HRA 1998? In the context of Alconbury , Lord Hoffmann was using the 'rule of law' to symbolise the constitutional order and the role of the courts within it. By contrasting the rule of lawyers, he was meaning to say that the courts are aware that the HRA was not intended to allow them to get politically involved and substitute their own decisions for that of public bodies. This idea of courts upholding the rule of law is reminiscent of the modified ultra vires theoretical justification for judicial review (courts are upholding the rule of law, because that is what Parliament intends). Yet, albeit not intended to give a new constitutional status to the courts, it is questionable how far the powers given to them when reviewing administrative acts and legislation involving human rights were intended to extend. ...read more.


The authority would not be seen as acting incompatibly if that is the way proscribed by primary legislation-s.6 (2). Again courts are bound by Parliament. But could it be said that the new and high standard of review- proportionality impinges somehow on this relationship between the courts and the legislature? The proportionality test is not the first instance of stringency of judicial scrutiny. For example, a heightened test was employed in ex parte Smith. This while more rigorous than the Wednesbury grounds for review, was occupying a medium position in comparison with judicial substitution of judgment, whereby the court imposes what it believes to be the correct meaning of the term or issue for review. Looking at the process of judicial review and the way in which proportionality test applies it could be said that it too is at a medium position in the spectrum of stringency. In case of interference the courts have to decide several things. Firstly, whether there has been a right interfered with and legislation which allows this, then whether there is a legitimate purpose served by this interference. If there is the courts have to determine whether the interference with the right is proportionate. It could be seen that the proportionality inquiry comes rather late in the general enquiry of review. ...read more.


and private bodies (Leonard Cheshire), which may exercise 'public' functions. The borderline between the latter two can be tenuous. It relation to providing accommodation it appears that the two cases above have settled the issue. But what is some other act of public nature is performed by a hybrid public authority. It is what very clear from Lord Woolf's speech in Donoghue when a private act would turn into one which is regarded as public. This is an important point as only the pure and the hybrid public authorise are covered by the new judicial review jurisdiction under the HRA. Oliver has been in favour of a more restricted view of public authority in the 'hybrid' sense, because to classify one as a public authority would deprive them of the benefit of the Act. He is therefore in favour of promoting rights through 'indirect horizontal effect'. This however has not been perceived as the role of the court. From the discussion above it could be seen that the HRA has had considerable implications for administrative law. There is a new ground for judicial review-proportionality and courts have power to review primary and secondary legislation and issue declarations of incompatibility. Whether the intention to fit this new roles of the courts with the existing constitutional order, as Lord Hoffmann contends, succeeds remain to be seen from the rigour which the courts would apply this new rights. As demonstrated above, they have tried to maintain a balance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Jurisprudence section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) incorporates the rights enshrined in the European Convention ...

    In the foregoing, it has been highlighted that the role of judiciary has been changed in light of HRA. Judges no longer merely interpret the legislation; HRA has given the judiciary a mandate to legislate. Traditionally, judges have shown a willingness to legislate, often where moral or ethical issues were

  2. Biology assignment - In Vitro Fertilization. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), is the ...

    2 As for IVF. 3 Egg collection from the follicles, using the ultrasound machine. Mixing with partner's sperm, and placement in the Fallopian tubes. In the case of the Delayed Gift procedure, an egg collection using the ultrasound machine is performed.

  1. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    Defining Human Rights There is no universal consensus on the definition of human rights because although human rights speak to everyone, different cultures have different concepts as to what human rights are and what they really mean. For example, country A might interpret the right to life to mean that

  2. To what extent is EU law on fundamental rights in a satisfactory state?

    The case at hand, made it clear that fundamental rights were capable of limiting the competence of the community therefore could be seen to sustain some satisfactory state. The case of Stauder announced the new doctrine of the European Courts conversion to fundamental rights.

  1. Ronald Dworkin and his interpretation of natural law and positivism.

    Dworkin accepts that there are holes within laws and legislation alike, which often leads to the most competent lawyers arguing about what is the best possible decision. It is these types of decisions in 'hard cases' that Dworkin believes Hercules would be able to reach.

  2. "The classical principle of parliamentary sovereignty has been radically altered as a result of ...

    In Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr-und Vorrattstelle fur Getreide4, the ECJ restated the principle of Community law supremacy when it was said that "the law stemming from the Treaty...cannot by its nature be overridden by rules of national law", and again in Simmenthal SpA v Italian Minister for Finance5 affirming

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    The legislation was introduced to bring to an end the situation whereby a complainant had to go to Strasbourg to assert their convention rights, as a claimant's case could now be heard in British courts, hence the title of the governments proposals for the Act in the white paper: "Rights brought home".

  2. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    of PA, 1987. Examination Process Typically, an application for a patent is examined before a patent is issued or granted for an invention. That is to say, the application is reviewed by the Registrar for patentability and compliance with application requirements. Where the Registrar is satisfied that the applicant has complied with the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work