• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The Land Registration Act 1925 was not intended to alter the practice of physical inspection, which was to remain subject to doctrine of notice. More recent interpretations fail to recognise this fact'. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Name: Divya Basanta Lala Class Group 6 2003 Exam Paper Question 6B 'The Land Registration Act 1925 was not intended to alter the practice of physical inspection, which was to remain subject to doctrine of notice. More recent interpretations fail to recognise this fact'. Discuss, with reference to S70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925 (now Schedule 1, para 2, Schedule 3, para 2 of the Land Registration Act 2002) Introduction The Land Registration Act (LRA) 1925 was one of the main statutes born from the 1925 code of legislation. The main purpose of the 1925 legislation was to make land more freely alienable and to reduce the onerous task of a purchaser in investigating title, whilst at the same time affording protection to the owners of equitable interests in the land. The main problem in land law is to achieve a balance between the interests of a purchaser (which includes a lesser and a mortgagee) on the one hand, and those who hold an equitable interest in the land on the other hand. The LRA 1925 brought a totally new system of conveyancing which required eventual registration of title to all land. ...read more.

Middle

As stated earlier, the purchaser had to inspect the title deed (which were piles of paper relating to legal and equitable interests in the land) very closely to see whether the seller actually owned what it was trying to sell to him. This documentary evidence was important to account for how the land became vested in him. The investigation had to go back to at least 15 years and this would provide the root of title. If the investigation of title was correctly carried out, it was considered that the purchaser had constructive notice of all interests, whether legal or equitable. However, there were some equitable interests which would not be known to exist if the purchaser relied only on investigation of title. They were equitable interests that did not appear on title deed and could be discovered by physical inspection of the land (first recognised in Hunt v Luck (1901)). Physical inspection meant to allow the purchaser to enquire about any interests, for example in cases of shared occupancy with the seller, and eradicate the limits of investigation of title. Thus, establishing constructive notice was a time-consuming and expensive process. ...read more.

Conclusion

Under the LRA 2002 Schedule 1 para 2, only actual occupation qualifies for overriding interests. Thus, when a person has a proprietary right and is in actual occupation, he has an overriding interest. But if the purchaser makes a physical inspection of the land and this person's rights are concealed or not disclosed, then the interests are not overriding. Conclusion Thus, from a modern stance, the basic problem with occupation-based overriding interests is that to require purchasers to go beyond what appears on the register and this defeat the purpose with which the LRA 1925 was introduced. Those writing the LRA wished to create a fool-proof system of conveyancing in the mirror principle which states that all interest should be perfectly reflected in the register and any reference to actual occupation is anomalous. However, it can be also be argued that the provision in s70(1)(g) specifically providing for overriding interests except where enquiry is made and those interests are not disclosed never intended to alter the practice of physical inspection. This loophole was left mainly to protect innocent parties who have equitable interests but failed to register them. This form of notice offers a fair and just solution to those parties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Land Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Land Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'The 'mirror' principle, the 'curtain' principle and the 'insurance' principle form the tripod on ...

    4 star(s)

    of the LRA protects the rights of every person in actual occupation of the land. The significance of these overriding interests is that they bind any disponee of registered land and therefore it can be seen that the mirror principle does not always reflect exactly the current position which the register is meant to provide to those carrying out searches.

  2. Would the abolishment of adverse possession in relation to both registered and unregistered land ...

    allows the removal of registered title owners from the protection of the registry if they fail to evict squatters. It also creates a pathway for squatters with genuine, deserving interests in the land to acquire adverse possession. It is left to question why the veto rule was not extended to unregistered land with the enactment of the Land Registration Act.

  1. Overreaching, Land Law

    Obviously the consequences of this were serious, it meant that the dependability of the register has been put to the test. The HOL in this decision clearly paid attention to the fact that there was a tension surrounding overriding at this current time, and came to the conclusion that protection

  2. Explain and critically analyse the process under the Land Registration Act 2002 for: ...

    and all charges subject to Land Charges Department in case it was an unregistered land. The protection of these cases was done directly by the erstwhile Act which was replaced by the Land Registration Act 2002. In the present act, the only provisions allowed are restrictions and notices.5 So it

  1. Land Registration Act 2002

    Nevertheless, Schedule 3, paragraph 2 upholds application only to proprietary rights due to its clarification that the interest must be one "affecting the estate" . Following a move during the Bill's debate to extend the categories of beneficiaries in actual occupation , the boundaries of Ainsworth are not immovable, and

  2. The enactment of the Land Registration Act 2002 offers an opportunity for a fresh ...

    being that the law as it stood under the LRA 1925 lacked certainty, simplicity and the ability to be economic. 6 The fundamental rationale of the LRA 2002 is that 'the register should be a complete and accurate reflection of the state of the title of the land at any

  1. The system of land charges registration is a step in the wrong direction for ...

    In this case a wife tried to register a Class F land charge (a spouseâs statutory right of occupation) against her husband using his name as she knew it, however unbeknownst to her he had a middle name, which had the effect of rendering the search of land under that

  2. Land law problem question - access

    This is provided she didnât fail to disclose the interest if enquiry had been made.[87] If Mrs Miggs fail to meet appropriate formalities, periodic tenancy may be implied (Prudential Assurance v LRB[88]), provided she takes possession and starts paying rent by reference to a period s55(c)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work