• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

`The negligence formula is unfair to claimants as it places too many obstacles in the way of obtaining compensation for personal injuries. England & Wales should adopt an alternative system of redress to allow claimants to obtain the compensation they des

Extracts from this document...


Formative Assessment 1 `The negligence formula is unfair to claimants as it places too many obstacles in the way of obtaining compensation for personal injuries. England & Wales should adopt an alternative system of redress to allow claimants to obtain the compensation they deserve'. Discuss. The law of negligence aims to hold individuals liable for the infliction of damage through want of care in order to protect others from harm arising as a result of an individual's lack of care. When an individual is found liable, the law attempts to achieve redress by compensating the claimant. In order for a claim in negligence to succeed, all of the following elements must be established: (i) A duty of care exists between the defendant and the claimant (ii) The defendant has acted in breach of that duty (iii) Damage was caused as a result of the defendant's breach (iv) The damage suffered is not too remote from the breach These elements make up what is known as the negligence formula and each must be proven by the claimant to show that the defendant was at fault. ...read more.


This can be difficult element to prove due to the fact that the courts adopt an objective standard which involves comparing the defendant to the "reasonable person". This strict standard of the "reasonable person", used most commonly for learner drivers and trainee doctors where they are judged by standards of reasonably competent doctors or drivers, can in fact benefit the claimant as it means that the defendant cannot escape liability by arguing he was not fully competent or qualified.10 However, one might argue that it is unfair to impose a standard to which it is impossible for an inexperienced defendant to reach.11 In cases involving clinical negligence, doctors may be able to escape liability if they are able to show that their actions are "in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art"12 and furthermore, the responsible body need not be large. This was criticized for overprotecting the medical profession as it allowed doctors to set their own standards for what is expected of them. The are however examples of cases where the courts have moved away from this approach, such as Hucks v Cole13 in which a doctor was found negligent for the treatment of his patient, even though he acted in accordance with a responsibly body of medical opinion. ...read more.


Although it has not been without faults and subject to various reforms since it's introduction, the Accident Compensation Scheme has established positive elements. The insurance system has been described as "rational and comprehensive"20 and can provide damages to the claimant in the absence of fault. It is funded by levies placed on employers and drivers. The loss of earnings that arise from an employer's negligence are able to be compensated to the victims and are determined based on an individual's working hours and earnings. There is also a lump sum available to all claimants who suffer permanent physical injury, which is capped at $17000. In comparison with the fault-based system in the UK, the no-fault alternative takes into account the needs and requirements of the claimant and is more efficient in comparison to the high litigation costs involved in proving fault. In Scotland, the Scottish Executive is currently examining the possibility of a no-fault scheme. With the present inadequacy of the current negligence system of compensating victims, and the benefits experienced in New Zealand as a result of their no-fault alternative, it seems that England and Wales may too benefit from a trial run of the no-fault scheme to provide a more effective means of allowing claimants to obtain the compensation they deserve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Tort Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Tort Law essays

  1. A Critical Examination of the Concept of Breach of Duty of Care

    Breach of duty is not restricted to professionals or persons under written or oral contract; we all have a duty to take reasonable care for others and their property. Anyone who unreasonably runs a risk that results in harm to others or their property, breaches their duty of reasonable care.

  2. "A duty of care arises not merely when damage is reasonably foreseeable, but when ...

    decision of a government officer or department, or judicial review, or another source of compensation, such as the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme, or another cause of action, such as a claim for breach of contract, even where the action would be against a different defendant, the court would not impose duty of care under tort.

  1. Consider the relationship between the torts of private nuisance and negligence and in doing ...

    to take reasonable care is also seen in the case of Goldman v Hargrave14. This case involved an action in nuisance after a redgum tree growing in the centre of the defendant's land had been struck by lightning and caught fire.

  2. Tort Law - Negligence

    in which Elliot (2003) adds that in cases where the defendant is reacting to an emergency situation, the judgement will be based on what a reasonable person would have done in that situation also considering the time available.

  1. Duty of Care.

    Although the fetus did not enjoy an independent legal personality, a child who suffered pre-natal injuries because of a negligent act occurring during the mother's pregnancy, would benefit from a cause of action from the moment of birth and could recover in respect of damage suffered since the birth as a result of pre-natal injuries.

  2. Negligence Case. The victims in this problem may have a claim in tort of ...

    defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage, but the damages recoverable in respect thereof shall be reduced to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage...(10)..."fault" means negligence, breach of statutory duty

  1. How courts determine causation

    Ltd (2000) 3 All E.R. 421 15 K Horsey & E Rackley, Tort Law (2nd edn, OUP 2011) 229-230 16 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority (1988) A.C. 1074 17 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services (2003) UKHL 22; [2003] 1 A.C.

  2. Tort law. In order to pursue a successful claim of negligence, The claimant ...

    A tower crane company had a legal responsibility to provide a safe working environment and also employ staff who is competent in their job role. In the case where the lecture which was driving his fast car, then later crashed his car which resulted in crushing a lady called Margret, he could be found liable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work