Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

the principles in the case of Ridge Vs Baldwin

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Administrative law coursework The case of Ridge versus Baldwin1 expresses the principles of natural justice. Natural justice has meant many things to many writers, lawyers and systems of law, including an approximate synonym of divine law, and also a form of the ius gentium or the common law of nations2. The common lawyers, however, have used the expression "natural justice" with surprising precision of meaning, as referring to two important but narrow principles only, namely audi alteram partem (hear both sides), and nemo judex in causa sua potest (no one can be judge in his own cause). "The phrase 'natural justice' is of course used only in a popular sense and must not be taken to mean there is any justice natural among men. Among most savages there is no such thing as justice in the modern sense."3 The common law, moreover, originally applied these principles only in the comparatively narrow context of the decision-making progress of a court of law.4 Lord Haldane, L.C., said in the famous case of Local Government Board V. Arlidge5, "When the duty of deciding an appeal is imposed, those whose duty it is to decide it must act judicially.

Middle

The justification for the application of the natural law principles to administrative bodies is based on the ultra vires doctrine; the court will not readily believe that parliament intends an administrative agency to come to a decision in such a manner as would flout natural justice; therefore if a particular body does not so act, it must be exceeding the powers conferred on it by parliament. The only circumstances submitted, in which the courts have recognized that the rules of natural justice need not be observed, are themselves situations where there can be no question of any excess of statutory powers. It has been suggested8, that the idea of natural justice, as understood in this sense, "contains the very kernel of the problem of administrative justice" ; it is this practice of insisting on observance of the principles of natural justice that has been used by the courts to exercise such inherent control as there may be over administrative agencies. We shall now consider the meaning of each of these two principles, as understood and applied by the common law, and discuss the kind of administrative agencies that must apply the principles, the circumstances in which they must be observed, and the situations to which they do not apply.

Conclusion

Hence this suit. The defendant denied the plaintiff's claim and contended inter alia that the plaintiff was lawfully summarily dismissed for gross misconduct in relation to the leaking of examinations and that all payments which were made to the plaintiff were made ex-gratia on humanitarian grounds. During scheduling conference the fact that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant and was in service of the defendant until he was terminated on 6th October 1999 was not contested. It was also agreed that the plaintiff received some amount of money from the defendant as terminal benefits. One of the issues was whether the plaintiff was unlawfully terminated or unlawfully dismissed 1 (1964) AC 40 2 Dowrick, Justice according to the English Common Lawyer (1961), chapter 4. 3 Per Maugham, J., in MacLean V. The Workers' Union (1929) 1 Ch. 602, at p. 624 4 Natural Justice, by H. H. Marshall (1959) 5 (1915) A.C. 120, at p.132 6 (1943) 2 All E.R. 337 7 Judicial Review of Administrative Action, at p. 99 8 Prof. H.W.R.Wade, Administrative Law, at p.127 9 (1964) A.C. 40 ?? ?? ?? ??

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Public Law

  1. The Proportionality test inevitably takes judges in to the review in to realms of ...

    Although this assumption is questionable Pool35 critiquing the Court of Appeal's procedural approach states that it be the wrong thing for the public authority to do for two reasons. The first being that the whole test is based on mistake, thus a claimant could succeed if the authority doesn't consider one aspect, which is not effective.

  2. Public law and Administration problem question

    the contentious area would be the grounds for review. If permission was granted I would advice plughole ltd to apply for Interim relief which works under the same principles as an injunction.28 Duty to give reasons One possible ground is under the natural justice29 duty to give reasons. There is however no general duty to give reasons30 so I would advise plughole ltd to establish one of the exceptions31.

  1. PLA Ultra Vires Essay

    of the first protocol of ECHR. In the International Transport Roth GmbH and others, similar questions were raised by the court and were rule as unlawful.6 In Brind, however the idea about proportionality was not welcome, as Lord Roskill said, "unless...parliament incorporates the [ECHR] in domestic law...

  2. The Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 6, 1921 was the foundation stone of an independent ...

    Many of the adverse attitudes were influenced by hostility to, or suspicion of, Eamon De Valera, so powerfully did the Fianna Fail leader polarise feelings in the bitterly divided political scene. On the "national" aspects of the Constitution, the small remnant of republican diehards like Mary MacSwiney were not seduced

  1. Labour law of Uzbekistan: part-time workers

    conditions that evolve in case of combining jobs purport acceleration of the growth of labour productivity and performance of the established amount of works with a smaller number of personnel.7 These circumstances imply the situation when an employee either combines professions,8 or (/and)9 undertakes expansions of service zones or increase

  2. The Advantages and Legal Issues of the One Spot Two Examinations System

    Bay Port Hong Kong Port Area Ordinance was passed by the Hong Kong Legislative Council on 25th April 2007 in order to exercise Hong Kong's jurisdiction in the SBPHKPA. Finally, after all these debates and proceedings, the Shenzhen Bay Port was opened on time.

  1. The Two Judgments: Golaknath and Kesavananda Bharati - The purpose of this article is ...

    that the Parliament by amendment cannot take away the fundamental rights but can abridge them within the limits laid down by Part III. It can even add other fundamental rights to the list. The third ground is an alibi for incompetence or neglect of duty.

  2. Estado de Derecho

    No obstante lo anterior, es de especial importancia resaltar que una vez que son nombrados los miembros de mesa, pasan a acatar únicamente instrucciones del Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones y deben mostrar una conducta totalmente imparcial en el ejercicio de sus labores, como se establece en el artículo 41 del Código Electoral.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.