• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Rule of Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(a) What is the Rule of Law and to what extent if at all is the Rule of Law applied in the English and Welsh legal system? The Rule of Law has no solid explanation as to its existence. It is more an ideal or a symbolic concept that has gathered many interpretations as to the definition. The Rule of Law can be traced back to Aristotle and theories of Natural and Devine Law. It was AV Dicey in the United Kingdom who built up the Doctrine of the Rule of Law in approximately 1895. Dicey's theory is one of the most famous attempts to define the Rule of Law. According to Dicey, the Rule of Law was one of the key features which distinguished the English constitution from its continental counterparts. He suggested that there were three main elements which together made for the Rule of Law. The first element he proposed was the absence of arbitrary power on part of the State. He said that the State shouldn't intervene and that the way in which it exercises such power is limited and controlled by law. The second element that Dicey suggested was that of equality before the law. He highlighted here that no person is above the law. Thirdly, Dicey proposed the element of supremacy of the ordinary law. He suggested that there is no need for a Bill of Rights in the United Kingdom's constitution, as the principle of judicial decisions determining an individuals rights is supreme as it attends to the rights of the individual, private person. ...read more.

Middle

Also, some politicians can't get sued for slander in parliament, indicating that they are also above the law. More low key, is the observation of the different treatment some celebrities may receive above other civilians. It has been evident in past situations that some may have escaped the clasps of the law in circumstances where other non-celebrities would not have. The supremacy of the ordinary law has also come under fire as to whether this concept exists today in our legal system. The relationship between the courts and government, and the conflict that exists between the two, has lead to some discussion as to whether the ordinary law and judicial decisions are supreme. Also, the relationship between the United Kingdom and Europe has lead to observation of the supreme power the EU now has over our government. A major component of this influence is the Human Rights Act 1998. The influence of Europe has limited the country's parliamentary sovereignty and this in itself questions how supreme ordinary law now is. When looking at the theory of Joseph Raz, it is clear that some of his presumptions as to the Rule of Law do not apply to the English and Welsh legal system today. When considering his theory that law should be prospective as oppose to retrospective, it is clear that is not always so. ...read more.

Conclusion

This therefore means that they do not enjoy due process. Although the Human Rights if the young have been improved by the introduction of the Children Act 1989 a, the signing of the UN convention on the Rights of a Child and the Human Rights Act 1998, those in position of authority have immense power over them economically and emotionally . They are able if they choose to virtually strip them of their rights. This therefore concludes that children do not always enjoy due process. Although it is held by most that the United Kingdom is still governed under the Rule of Law, and it is believed by many to be the foundations of our legal system, it is clear that today, the Rule of Law remains an ideal and has no solid definition on which to base it. With numerous interpretations of what it really is, and the ways in which our legal system does not always abide by the main principles of the Rule of Law such as 'no-one is above the law', it is reasonable to question whether the Rule of Law does actually exist in the English and Welsh legal system. The way in which due process, which is supposed to uphold law and order and uphold the position of society and the ideal of justice, does not allow all people to enjoy it and many may be deprived in this area, is an addition to the argument that the Rule of Law does not exist and that the idea and numerous interpretations of it are merely symbolic. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of using the literal rule. Question . ...

    to treat any difference in their wording as capable of casting doubt upon what is clear and unambiguous language in the consolidation Act" - Lord Diplock in R. v. Curran 1976 - even though such Acts are intended to restate old Acts!

  2. Discuss Dicey's three propositions on the concept of the Rule of Law in the ...

    A law-abiding individual, it is argued, need never worry about such organisations. Also there are bodies that theoretically oversee the activities of government agencies and their work - such as the Council of Tribunals and the Parliamentary Commissioner. It is argued that these bodies help to protect the rights of

  1. Trust Law: 'The rule that charities must not undertake political activity is unsatisfactory ...

    Where the burden of proof regarding public benefit would lie on the organisation seeking charitable status. An objective test could be applied, this taking the form of agreement that the proposal was for the public benefit by 'all right thinking men'.

  2. 'There is too much discretion, and not enough law, in the sentencing process.' Discuss

    in the hands of the court in many cases.26 The problem with a largely unfettered sentencing discretion is that it has resulted in widespread inconsistency.27 This essentially flouts the principle of equality before the law and the rule of law maxims that the law must be certain and that legal

  1. "The need for an independent judiciary is recognised throughout the free world. It is ...

    Two submissions concerning judicial reticence will be made. Firstly, this obligation can be called a term in the 'contract', which in exchange provides them with freedom from public scrutiny and accountability, thus ensuring their independence and in effect, placing them above the 'Rule of Law'.

  2. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    The current law on theft stems from the 1968 Theft Act. 1978 Theft act was created due to failures in the 68 act. The 68 act was very weak on deception offences Delegated legislation The process of passing a statute 1.

  1. Free essay

    Assess the Idea of the Rule of Law from Different Perspectives.

    it is submitted that there are few orthodox expressed by academics and as well from the legal profession as the rule of law has grown up to become such an important element though it may not be unique under UK's constitution.

  2. It should be up to the government whether or not to allow terrorists to ...

    However, it should be remembered although democratically elected, there were still a minority who did not vote for them and even if they should be given trust, the government is still capable of abusing their power. 'There are limits to the legitimacy of executive or legislative decision-making, just as there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work