Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8

The Socio-Emotional Effects of Hate crimes in Communities and on Human Beings

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

The Socio-Emotional Effects of Hate crimes in Communities and on Human Beings Introduction Hate crimes are criminal actions intended to harm or intimidate people because of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, or other minority group status. They are also referred to as bias crimes. Hate crimes have existed from the beginning of time, severely affecting communities and people without our knowledge. Since the 1980's researchers have tried to explain the social and mental effects of hate crimes on human beings as a whole. In order to eliminate these horrific acts of hate the United States needs to pass the Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Sociology A hate crime is a crime that intentionally offends the victim on an emotional level, for the victim is picked out solely for whom he/she is. The purveyors of hate use explosives, arson, weapons, vandalism, physical violence, and verbal threats of violence to instill fear in their victims, leaving them vulnerable to more attacks and feeling helpless, suspicious, and fearful. Others may become more frustrated and angry if they believe the local government and other groups in the community will not protect them. When perpetrators of hate are not prosecuted as criminals and their acts not publicly condemned, their crimes can weaken even those communities with the healthiest race relations. In 1996, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) received reports of 10,706 hate crimes from state and local law enforcement agencies, involving 11,039 victims, and 10,021 known perpetrators.

Middle

Herek observed among hate crime survivors may have resulted from a heightened sense of personal danger and vulnerability that becomes associated with their identity as a gay man or lesbian. Previous research has shown that all crime victims are likely to feel more vulnerable after their experience and to perceive the world as more dangerous, unpredictable, and hostile. The present data suggest that hate crime victims, in addition, often link this sense of vulnerability and powerlessness to their gay or lesbian identity. This association can be psychologically harmful because sexual orientation is such an important part of the self-concept. In addition, it is reasonable to expect that victims of hate crimes based on race, ethnicity, religion, or another comparable characteristic may also experience heightened psychological distress because the incident represents a serious attack on a fundamental aspect of the victim's personal identity. The effects that hate crime victims experience are due solely on the fact that each status (race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) is associated with different kinds of life experiences for the individual and historical experiences for the affected community. Hate crimes based on sexual orientation appear to have more serious psychological effects on lesbians and gay men than do other crimes. Political Science The hate crimes described above in a sociological and psychological aspect shocked the nation and created a public uproar that forced lawmakers to create a federal legislation to combat these socio-emotional problems.

Conclusion

Lawmakers have passed legislation to encourage data collection and attach enhanced penalties to hate crimes at both state and federal levels. President Bill Clinton sponsored a White House Conference on Hate Crimes in 1997, at which he announced numerous initiatives, including his support for expanded coverage of hate crimes in federal legislation. In order for the federal government to take stand against hate crimes in the United States, the Hate Crime Prevention Act is a must. Changes in hate crime legislation, whether viewed favorably or negatively are simmering. With the passing of the Hate Crime Prevention Act, legislation and the federal government gives itself the right to investigate and prosecute hate crimes. The HCPA is the only way to guarantee equal treatment for all. Conclusion In the words of ex Vice President Al Gore, "We must send a clear and strong message to all who would commit crimes of hate: it is wrong, it is illegal, and we will catch you and punish you to the force of our laws." A crime is a crime, no matter what motivated the incident. All crimes should be punished accordingly and with the same degree whether the crime was committed because of gender, race, sexual orientation, or any other bias. Any crime committed against another human being is a hate crime. People know this is persistent and serious and causes socio-emotional affects on human beings. These violent crimes happen in communities, schools, and work places. No area is immune. The Socio-Emotional Effects of Hate crimes in Communities and on Human Beings Kelsey Brodie Kelly Champion M.S.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Jurisprudence essays

  1. An Introduction to the Law of Intellectual Property

    Remedies for infringement 1. Civil Remedies (Sect. 36 and 37 of CNRA, 1999) Any person whose rights are in eminent danger of being infringed or have been infringed, may institute proceedings in the United Republic of Tanzania for:- a) An injunction to prevent the infringement or to prohibit the continuation of the infringement; b)

  2. Universal conceptions of human rights should supersede culturally relative conceptions. Discuss. Assess the effectiveness ...

    Now that FGM as a human rights issue has been reflected in international instruments, the challenge is to ensure that those instruments are translated into effective action at the national level138. This goal can only be achieved in collaboration with the national and international non-governmental organizations that has persistently been

  1. The death penalty is an effective punishment for the worst crimes and should be ...

    The death penalty is thus the legal right of the sovereign to protect its citizens. Punishment serves various purposes. One of its main purposes is rehabilitation; to enable to prisoner to experience remorse and to emerge from prison lacking the criminal tendencies possessed beforehand.

  2. Beneficial joint tenants and the protection of purchasers: An unsolved problem

    [FN13] The draftsmen of the 1925 legislation had to decide what level of protection, if any, should be given to purchasers so as to make land more marketable; their eventual policy, [FN14] embodied in the legislation, was extremely pro-purchaser. They effected this by means of two devices; the first of general application, the second relevant only to registered titles.

  1. Forensic psychology essay

    drive on", and Schlesinger argues that, for serial murderers, this compulsion act as a "means of liberation from unbearable inner tension2." Krafft-Ebing, one of the first authors to write a comprehensive account of serial homicide in 1886, described the overwhelming compulsion felt by the serial murderer Vincenz Verzeni, who felt that "with freedom he could not resist his impulses7."

  2. What is wrong with inequality?

    There is an intimate connection between people's views about equality and their views about justice and fairness8. Egalitarians believe that to be worse off than others - by no fault of your own, is unfair and unreasonable. There are certain inequalities which are seen to be wrong.

  1. Critically assess the notion; 'Privatising Prisons is 'Morally Wrong''

    It is perceived the weaponry of the crown to segregate and punish criminals. The moral argument on this point is one which; lacks sustenance, it is perceived that through privatisation parliament is giving up its sovereignty (as the unwillingness towards the EU shows, sovereignty is regarded as the only truly British characteristic remaining in today's diverse British community).

  2. Non Violence and Black Power: How differing conceptions of power led to the transition ...

    Alternatively did they consider themselves excluded from the political decision making process of American democracy or more subtly did they occupy the "middle levels of power" (Mills,1959,p.296), playing the democratic game within a restricted framework only after important decisions had already been made (Silverman,1970)?

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.