• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are five main legal systems in the world

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

There are five main legal systems in the world. They are: Civil law legal system, Common law legal system, Customary law system, Muslim law legal system and Mixed systems. Civil law legal system and common law legal system are the most important legal systems in the world, which effect on the all legal systems in the world for a very long time and have been adopt by the most countries. Civil law distinguished form common law is that Civil law is based on written legal codes, a characteristic of the Roman legal system, in which disputes were settled by reference to a written legal code arrived at through legislation, edicts, and the like. However, common law is based on the precedents created by judicial decision over time. "Civil law legal system is based on Roman law, especially the corpus Juris Civilis of emperor Justinian, as late developed through the Middle Ages by medieval legal scholars. The most authoritative modern source is Karl Eduard Zacharie."[1] Civil law legal system is commonly used in continental Europe, which is also used in Quebec (Canada), Louisiana (USA), Japan, China, Latin America, and most former colonies of continental European countries. One of the remarkable traits in civil law legal system is codified law, in order to follow the unified legal system and to use statute law. ...read more.

Middle

Whereas, the primary source of law in the common law system is cases, while statutes are only seen as explanations which are introduced into the common law and interpreted narrowly.[4] With the development of legal systems, it is hard to distinguish the difference by the fact of codification because common law jurisdictions have frequently codified parts of their law. For example, the American has enacted the <<U.S. Uniform Commercial Code>>.Meanwhile, Case law is not the "patent" of some particular legal tradition, but an important component of the legal system in a society based on the rule of law.[5] Although civil law countries don't accept case as the source in judgment, lots of judge invoke methods as "judge-made law" under the rule of stare decisis in practices. Such as the American sociologist of law Marc Galant said, after a systematic investigation, the function of case law is a principle of modern legal systems in the world.[6] Because of the different backgrounds and juridical concepts between civil law legal system and common law legal system, some rules and definitions are also can be pointed out clearly: 1. The pre-judgment interests are recoverable as of right in civil law, which has just been rewarded only in relatively recent times in common law systems. 2. ...read more.

Conclusion

(France); Art. 1617 C.C.Q. (Qu�bec); Art. 2000 C.C. (Louisiana). Justice M H McHugh J, (1995), The Growth of Legislation and Litigation' 69 Australian Law Journal 37. Study gide. Qi, Zhang.,(2002), Comparative Law Study, Series NO.4, in Chinese, China The modern legal system, ,<<Modern legal research>>, 2000, p 252 Wikipedia Encyclopedia, civil law (legal system), [Online], available:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_%28legal_system%29 [22nd, Mar, 2005] Wikipedia Encyclopedia, civil law (legal system), [online]. Available: http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Civil%20law%20(legal%20system)#Civil_vs_Common_law [22, Mar, 2005] William Tetley, Q.C. (2000), Mixed jurisdictions : common law vs civil law (codified and uncodified), [online], available: http://www.unidroit.org/english/publications/ew/articles/1999-4a.htm[25, Mar, 2005] [1] see Civil law (legal system), Wikipedia Encyclopedia,. 22, Mar, 2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_%28legal_system%29 [2] Asif Tufal, "The tort of negligence", 19th. May, 2003 http://www.lawteacher.net/Tort/Negligence/Negligence%20Flowchart.pdf [3] Justice M H McHugh J, 'The Growth of Legislation and Litigation' (1995) 69 Australian Law Journal 37. [4] ] see Civil law (legal system), Wikipedia Encyclopedia,. 22, Mar, 2005 http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Civil%20law%20(legal%20system)#Civil_vs_Common_law [5] Qi, Zhang., Comparative Law Study, Series NO.4, 2002 in Chinese, China [6] The modern legal system, ,<<Modern legal research>>, 2000, p 252 [7] Art. 1153 C.C. (France); Art. 1617 C.C.Q. (Qu�bec); Art. 2000 C.C. (Louisiana). [8] William Tetley, Q.C. Mixed jurisdictions : common law vs civil law (codified and uncodified), 17th.Mar.2000. http://www.unidroit.org/english/publications/review/articles/1999-4a.htm [9]see "dispute resolution", Wikipedia Encyclopedia,. 22, Mar, 2005 http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/D/Di/Dispute_resolution.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? Compare the impact of two legal systems on business practices in terms of law making and dispute resolution. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Free essay

    Legal systems - Comparison between Civil Law and Common Law

    Commercial Law is a law of merchants and traders. I also want to write a modern definition of the Civil law from Juristic dictionary. "Civil law is a branch of law, norms of which regulate property relations; also it regulates personal non-property relations."

  2. &amp;quot;Critically discuss the role and importance of international commercial arbitration as an alternative dispute ...

    Nevertheless, once the parties have agreed to set up the arbitration for the resolution of their dispute, their right to withdraw will be construed as a breach of the arbitration agreement. The parties must then accept some approximations, sometimes they may fear some lenient views which compromise the parties' positions with little regard applicable law.

  1. Alternative Dispute Resolution.

    preference from a more-formal to a less-formal dispute resolution method (Bresiger, 2001). Today, most disputes still go to litigation, but court is seen as a last resort in more and more civil disputes. It is really only necessary to go to court when one of the disputants refuses to act in good faith to seek a fair resolution.

  2. Adversarial and Inqusitorial legal systems

    The adversarial system assumes that truth is most likely to result from the open competition between the prosecution and the defense. Primary responsibility for the presentation of evidence and legal arguments lies with the opposing parties, not with a judge.

  1. &amp;quot;Common Law and Civil Law&amp;quot;

    Equity looks to the intention rather than the form." (Koh, 2003:23). After the Judicature Act 1873, all courts had to apply the principles of Equity whenever necessary (von Bernstorff, 1996:6). 3.2.2 Custom The source of custom is a rule that also exists in the civil law legal system but its impact is in no way as strong as in the common law system.

  2. Critically compare and contrast the extent to which judges in civil law jurisdictions, (such ...

    They use a variety of language styles from ordinary to technical jargon and on top of this they are often drafted by more than one person. So clearly the way in which words, and ultimately laws, are interpreted is extremely important if we are to have a judicial system that works smoothly and efficiently.

  1. the law is never static; it is always changing, being interpreted or redefined

    This corporate criminal accountability remains controversial. The idea of a corporate legal personality developed with the changes in social perception and the Bill makes provision for the offence of corporate manslaughter holding companies responsible for certain deaths. The Police, along with the Health and Safety Executive can investigate if a

  2. Rickards vs Lothian

    The former was irrelevant, loosely worded - "malicious" being used for "mischievous" or "reckless" - and contrary to the evidence, which pointed to accident, and did not absolve the appellant or his servants in the course of their employment. The defendant's duty in this case was to take every precaution

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work