• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are many advantages and disadvantages to law making in parliament; however the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

eTMA 02 Question 1 (a) - An Act of Parliament is any law debated and passed by parliament, this is also known as legislation and statutes. Example legislation is the Adoption Act 1976. (b) - Delegated Legislation is when another body or person creates law under the authority which has been passed to them, through the enabling act of Parliament. An example is as follows, The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) (c) - Within the UK Court structure the Supreme Court is the UK's highest court of appeal. The court of appeal and high court submit their cases for appeal to the Supreme Court, generally of significant importance, either public or deep seated. All decisions made by the Supreme Court are binding on all lower courts in the hierarchy. (d) - The Golden rule is an approach of statutory interpretation which every judge can use when overseeing any case. The Golden rule is an adaption to the literal rule (which looks at the statue word for word) and is used to avoid any ludicrous result that the Literal rule may cause. ...read more.

Middle

An example of a such a case is, R v R [1992] 1 AC 599. The change in the act acknowledged the feasibility of rape occurring during a marriage. Disadvantages; Some disadvantages of Law making in parliament will correspond with the advantages of secondary legislation (delegated legislation), for example, Law making in Parliament to make its way through the processes and receive the royal assent, can be a time consuming process. Whereas in regards to delegated legislation, the processes to introduce and Act takes much less time for example, The Export and Movement Restrictions (Foot-and-Mouth Disease) (No.2) Regulations 2007, which came into effect on the 5th of December 2007 and was only made an hour earlier. Although there is an intense level of scrutiny when an act is going through all of the stages, if the act is on a very specific or local subject matter, the expertise within Parliament will undoubtedly not be as strong than if the authority were to be passed on to a specific body to make the law under delegated legislation for example bylaws created by a local authority, an example of this kind is the Railway byelaws made under Section 219 of the transport act 2000. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are two further rules which are also used in regards to statutory interpretation, the golden rule is an adaption to the literal rule and is used to avoid any ludicrous result that the Literal rule may cause. An example of the Golden Rule being used in a case, Re Sigsworth [1935] Ch89. Also the Mischief rule, which looks at the statue before the law now in place and requests the court to make an educated decision on what the gap the new law now intended to cover. In regards to statutory interpretation the judge making the decision does indeed decide on the more intricate details of the law, only an adaption as to how the law is interpreted. Some judges form decisions around the law and the interpretation which could be transpired to be creating law, as the decisions made within that case do need to be followed as a form of precedent. In conclusion the information shows that Judges before the mid-13th century did create the law, since the UK Parliament came into effect the judges to this day no longer make the law we form our everyday lives to, but yet give an interpretation within the boundaries they have been given to allow for a fairer, more efficient judiciary system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Describe how the system of the judicial precedent operates - Discuss the advantages and ...

    This makes it easier for people to understand what the law is and enable people to organise their businesses and make contracts. It also makes it easier for lawyers to advise their clients on what to do at court. This means that fewer cases have to go to court for a decision to be made.

  2. Does the law of nullity continue to have any valuable role to play in ...

    Under the Marriage Act 1949 where the parties are within the framework laid down by the Act but innocently fail to comply with the stipulated formalities, the marriage is valid. However if their failure to follow the formalities is 'knowing and wilful' the marriage is void.

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    Chapell - A dead man is not entitled to vote Chapell was acquitted London Railway v Berriman 1946 Start to pay compensation to workers injured on track. Wording - "Relaying and repairing track" Hit by train whilst maintaining Said no reference to maintaining Inland Revenue v Hinchy 1960 1960 Finance Act (tax act)

  2. Where judges do not follow precedent (or where they distinguish binding cases on dubious ...

    Prof Stone, on the other hand, suggested that there is no unique ratio of a case, but rather a selection of possible rationes from which later judges may legitimately choose. It is only in the light of those later decisions that the ratio of the earlier case can be determined.

  1. This has become clear from several decisions which the Bundeskartellamt has already made

    In accordance with the new system, all competitors providing a specific transport service on a particular part of the rail network will pay the same price per kilometre of route travelled. The discriminatory effects, which the Bundeskartellamt considered to be major components of the TPS 98 system, and on which

  2. Judicial accountability

    From him alone emanated all justice. However this sovereign was not above the law, but under it. If he swerved from the accepted law of the land, he could be punished just like any other citizen of the State. The "Brihadaranyak Upanishad" says that the law is king of kings.

  1. Produce a report that looks at the functions of each court, with emphasis on ...

    The Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division cannot substitute the public bodies decision with one of it's own but should it find that the decision of the public body is ultra vires, it can make what is known as a prerogative order to remedy the decision taken by the public body.

  2. PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY IS MORE ABOUT THE COURTS THAN IT IS ABOUT PARLIAMENT.

    long as they are passed correctly but that ordinary courts have no jurisdiction, nor are they willing, to enquire into issues concerning the internal affairs of Parliament. This is known as the 'enrolled Act' rule. It was again shown in the case of Ex Parte Canon Selwyn (1872) J.P. 54.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work