• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There is no statutory definition of intention in English law. Indeed, over the past few decades there has been much controversy over the actual meaning of the concept 'intention'". Explain and evaluate this statement.

Extracts from this document...


This essay will deliberate the extent to which the meaning of the concept of 'intention' in criminal law has proven controversial through analysis of pertinent case law and academic critiques. In particular this essay will explore how the concept of 'intention' has changed in various cases in chronological order and the effect this has had. The essay will then focus on the current criticisms of the concept and proposals for reform will be discussed. A conclusion will be made reasoning the extent of controversy that surrounds the concept of intention in both the past few decades and in the present day. In many conduct crimes whereby the defendant's conduct is required to produce a particular consequence, liability can either be based on his intention or his recklessness as to that consequence. The offences that are based on the proof of, and rely on the definition of 'intention' to find liability are most notably the more serious crimes1, with much of the debate on the meaning of 'intention' being centred around the offence of murder2. Nonetheless, intention is not defined in any statute therefore its meaning must be derived from judicial decisions3, thus one would think that such an elementary term would have been definitively defined a long time ago; however this is not the case as we will see. ...read more.


A concrete block was dropped and the driver was killed. The trial judge directed the jury suggested in Maloney and they were convicted of murder but on appeal the HoL held that this had been incorrect and that a verdict of manslaughter should be imposed. Their Lordships were in accord with Lord Bridge that foresight of consequences was not in itself intention, but they were concerned the question of whether the death was a 'natural consequence' might suggest to juries that they need not consider the degree of probability. Lord Scarman suggested that the jury should be directed that 'the greater the probability of a consequence, the more likely it is that the consequence was foreseen and that if that consequence was foreseen the greater probability is that the consequence was also intended'. This ruling was pivotal in that it removed the ambiguous notion of 'natural consequence' and created a new scrutiny that considered the degree of probability of a consequence. This concept was further clarified in R v Nedrick18 where Lord Lane CJ stated that even if death or GBH is not the defendant's aim or wish, the jury may infer intention if they decide that death or GBH were virtually certain from the act, and that the defendant foresaw that was the case. ...read more.


L.R 2003 at p593 15 [1985] AC 905 16 J. Herring, Criminal Law (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 6th Edition) at p65 17 [1985] 3 WLR 1014 18 [1986] 1 WLR 1025 Court of Appeal 19 [1999] AC 82 House of Lords 20 C. Elliot and F. Quinn, Criminal Law (Pearson Education, 2008, 7th Edition) at p59 21 C. Elliot and F. Quinn, Ibid at p63 22 D. Ormerod, Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2008, 12th Edition) at p100 23 [2003] 2 Cr App R 30 24 M. Jefferson, Criminal Law (Pearson Education, 2009, 9th Edition) at p105 25 Arfan Khan, 'Intention in criminal law: time to change?' Stat. L.R. 2002, 23(3) at p236 26 C. Elliot and F. Quinn, Criminal Law (Pearson Education, 2008, 7th Edition) at p65 27 C.M.V. Clarkson, H. Keating and S.R. Cunningham, Criminal Law: Texts and Materials (Thomson, 2007, 6th Edition) 28 Report no.306 'Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide' (November 2006) based on the consultation paper: The Law Commission, 'A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?' (December 2005) 29 J. Dine, J. Gobert and W. Wilson, Cases and Materials on Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2006, 5th Edition) at 152 30 A. Reed and B. Fitzpatrick, Criminal Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 2009, 4th Edition) at p66 31 D. Ormerod, Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2008, 12th Edition) at p97 32 A. Ashworth, Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2009, 6th Edition) at p177 33 M.Jefferson. Op.cit. at p110 34 M.Jefferson. Loc. cit. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminal law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

5 Stars,

An excellent essay, which shows a strong command of the subject matter in hand.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 07/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminal law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Chain of causation problem question. The given case is concerned with the law ...

    4 star(s)

    More specifically gross negligence manslaughter. As mentioned in the case regarding Bert, Albert is unlikely to be charged with constructive manslaughter because of the break in the chain of causation due to the informed decision of Diane and also because omissions in themselves do not amount to constructive manslaughter.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Law Omissions. In the English legal system there is generally no liability ...

    4 star(s)

    of manslaughter the trial judge in the case commented 'if a grown up person chooses to undertake the care of a human creature, helpless either from infancy, simplicity, lunacy or infirmity...and if a person has chosen to take charge of a helpless creature lets it die by wicked negligence, than

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Criminal Justice System of Great Britain

    4 star(s)

    Potential jurors are members of the public that are randomly selected through their inclusion on the Electoral Register. If summoned they are legally obligated to perform their civic duty. To serve as a jury member they must first meet a range of specific requirements: they must be within the ages

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Viscount Sankey's Golden Thread Speech

    3 star(s)

    In 'Practical Guide to Evidence'4 it states that 'it was incumbent on the defendant to satisfy the jury of his innocence, or of the existence of a mitigating circumstance'. Prior to the changes made by this case, murder was an exception to the rule that to establish guilt, you must

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "All inchoate offences should be abolished on the theory that society is not harmed ...

    3 star(s)

    The appeal was then dismissed, as it would have been possible for the defendant's friend to do it. In conclusion after looking at all of the inchoate offences, the strengths of the proposition that 'all inchoate offences should be abolished on the theory that society is not harmed until the crime is complete, can be many things.

  2. What was the impact of the decision of R v G and R?

    Additionally from the Cunningham case, the expression 'Maliciously' was replaced with the expression 'reckless' in RvG by 'Lord Bingham' in the House of Lords. 'Maliciously' was an expression which was formerly recognisable within the House of Lords. This proposal was changed because the term 'maliciously' was seen to be too narrow and with limited scope.

  1. 'Analyse the meaning of the words 'appropriation' and 'dishonesty' within the Theft Act 1968

    A situation, which caused some problems for the courts, was where a defendant assumed some right of the owner, but with the owners permission. This posed a question of whether this was an appropriation. If the person has the owners permission then the common sense answer would be that it is not appropriation.

  2. problem question on murder

    This means 'the whole man, not just the physical'. Although, the chain of causation can be broken by the victim's conduct (Dear 1996)8. In proving mens rea Boris would be found guilty if the intention to commit crime will be proved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work