• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the rules governing the doctrine of frustration in the law of contract? Evaluate it's usefulness.

Extracts from this document...


Paper 1, June 2000, Question 5 a) What are the rules governing the doctrine of frustration in the law of contract? (15m) b) Evaluate the usefulness of this doctrine. (10m) a) The term "frustration of a contract" defines the unexpected termination of a contract as a result of an event that either renders the performance impossible or illegal, or prevents its main purpose from being achieved. For a contract to be frustrated, there must first be a contract between the parties. The frustration must be beyond the control of the contracting parties, and the event must bring the contract to an end. ...read more.


The modern test was enunciated by Lord Simon in National Carriers v. Palpina, where frustration arises when 'there supervenes an event (without default of either party, and for which the contract makes no sufficient provision), which so significantly changes the nature of the outstanding contractual rights/ obligations from what the parties could reasonably have contemplated at the time of its execution that it would be unjust to hold them to the literal sense of stipulation in the new circumstances.' In Davis Contractors v. Fareham UDC, Lord Radcliff stated that frustration occurs where to require performance would be to render the obligation something 'radically different' from what was undertaken by the contract. ...read more.


and "where one party has obtained a valuable benefit, before the time of discharge, the other party may recover from him such sums as the court considers just," in Section 1(3). Section 1(3) was applied in BP Exploration v Hunt in 1982, where it was held that the court must identify and value the 'benefit' obtained, and access the 'just sum' which it is proper to award. This section was devised to prevent unjust enrichment, but has its limits. The Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act does not apply to charter parties, contracts for the sale of specific goods which have perished and contracts of insurance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. It is only in the rarest circumstances that a court will deem a contract ...

    nature of the contract it is apparent that the parties contracted on the basis of the continued existence of the particular person or chattel". Treitel12 suggests that Blackburn was making the assumption that the court was only doing what the parties really intended to do themselves13.

  2. Discuss the scope of the doctrine and remedies for frustration of contract in English ...

    This reduced the value of the property by approximately 90%. The court held that the contract was not frustrated because the claimants were aware of the risk, as evidenced by a pre-contract enquiry as to whether the building could be listed.

  1. Business Law The Law of Contract

    As against a person dealing as consumer, liability for breach of the obligations arising from- (a) section 13, 14 or 15 of the 1979 Act (seller's implied undertakings as to conformity of goods with description or sample, or as to their quality or fitness for a particular purpose); (b)

  2. Describe the doctrine of frustration and explain how the rules relating to frustrated contracts ...

    Also, in Robinson v Davison, a piano player who was booked to perform fell ill on the day of the concert. It was held that the contract had been frustrated when his affliction made it arduous for him to perform.

  1. Discuss the development of doctrine of frustration regard to the law of contact

    This rule was founded in Chandler v. Webster12, where the plaintiff agreed to hire a room from the defendant to watch the Coronation procession. The price of £141 was payable immediately and he paid £100. The procession was cancelled before the balance was paid and he claimed to recover the paid amount.

  2. Types of circumstances leading to frustration.

    Subsequent illegality also leads to a frustrated contract. This means when parties are ready to perform but changes in the law prevent it, such as the law in another country changes5 or the law changes due to an outbreak of war as illustrated in the Re Shipton Anderson case.6 The

  1. Does The Law Of England And Wales Need A Doctrine Of Common Mistake?

    In the case of Couturier v. Hastie (1856)6 when the subject matter of the contract has ceased to exist at the time that the parties entered into the contract the contract can be treated as void. In this case a cargo of corn was shipped from the Mediterranean to England which was sold by the cargo

  2. The Doctrine of Frustration

    Prudence should be able to argue that the contract is frustrated as the hall was not available at the time agreed in the contract. It was a matter of failure of deliverance on time. Jerry failed to supply the hall for the students although he was contractually obliged to do

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work