• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the rules governing the doctrine of frustration in the law of contract? Evaluate it's usefulness.

Extracts from this document...


Paper 1, June 2000, Question 5 a) What are the rules governing the doctrine of frustration in the law of contract? (15m) b) Evaluate the usefulness of this doctrine. (10m) a) The term "frustration of a contract" defines the unexpected termination of a contract as a result of an event that either renders the performance impossible or illegal, or prevents its main purpose from being achieved. For a contract to be frustrated, there must first be a contract between the parties. The frustration must be beyond the control of the contracting parties, and the event must bring the contract to an end. ...read more.


The modern test was enunciated by Lord Simon in National Carriers v. Palpina, where frustration arises when 'there supervenes an event (without default of either party, and for which the contract makes no sufficient provision), which so significantly changes the nature of the outstanding contractual rights/ obligations from what the parties could reasonably have contemplated at the time of its execution that it would be unjust to hold them to the literal sense of stipulation in the new circumstances.' In Davis Contractors v. Fareham UDC, Lord Radcliff stated that frustration occurs where to require performance would be to render the obligation something 'radically different' from what was undertaken by the contract. ...read more.


and "where one party has obtained a valuable benefit, before the time of discharge, the other party may recover from him such sums as the court considers just," in Section 1(3). Section 1(3) was applied in BP Exploration v Hunt in 1982, where it was held that the court must identify and value the 'benefit' obtained, and access the 'just sum' which it is proper to award. This section was devised to prevent unjust enrichment, but has its limits. The Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act does not apply to charter parties, contracts for the sale of specific goods which have perished and contracts of insurance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Contract Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Contract Law essays

  1. It is only in the rarest circumstances that a court will deem a contract ...

    nature of the contract it is apparent that the parties contracted on the basis of the continued existence of the particular person or chattel". Treitel12 suggests that Blackburn was making the assumption that the court was only doing what the parties really intended to do themselves13.

  2. Discuss the scope of the doctrine and remedies for frustration of contract in English ...

    Firstly, if there are provisions in the contract that provide for a solution if an event occurs, then an argument based on frustration is unlikely to be entertained as the parties have already provided for the occurrence.vii Secondly, if the event is foreseeable, the parties are unable to avail of the doctrine of frustration.

  1. Business Law The Law of Contract

    The damage suffered by Caparo was foreseeable but there was no "sufficient proximity" to give rise to a duty of care where the loss was economic. The courts view was that it would not be fair or reasonable to hold the defendant responsible.

  2. Describe the doctrine of frustration and explain how the rules relating to frustrated contracts ...

    Also, in Robinson v Davison, a piano player who was booked to perform fell ill on the day of the concert. It was held that the contract had been frustrated when his affliction made it arduous for him to perform.

  1. Discuss the development of doctrine of frustration regard to the law of contact

    This rule was founded in Chandler v. Webster12, where the plaintiff agreed to hire a room from the defendant to watch the Coronation procession. The price of �141 was payable immediately and he paid �100. The procession was cancelled before the balance was paid and he claimed to recover the paid amount.

  2. A contract may be automatically discharged under the doctrine of frustration. This can only ...

    Tsakiroglou & Co. Ltd v Noblee Thorl (1961)4 . The claimant agreed to buy groundnuts from the defendant. The defendant was to ship the nuts to Hamburg from Port Sudan. Both parties assumed that the ship would take the route through the Suez Canal.

  1. Types of circumstances leading to frustration.

    If, before the work was completed, the factory is destroyed the contract is frustrated4 but if only the machinery is destroyed, A must do the work again at no extra cost. Impossibility also includes death or illness of a party, outbreak of war, unavoidable delay, etc.

  2. The doctrine of frustration should not be lightly invoked... DIscuss

    several contracts which will not only taint the sanctity of a contract but will also contradict the purpose of the contract. Despite of its supposed expansion and progression, the courts have always been apprehensive of its consequences on the law of contract and the pacta sunt servanda which should be guarded from any interference or exploitation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work