• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7

What role does the Supreme Court play in the American Political System?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What role does the Supreme Court play in the American Political System? Perhaps it is no surprise that the country which contains more than half of the lawyers in the world also contains the most powerful court in the world : the Supreme Court. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court plays a major role in American political life, acting as the final court of appeal and the final arbiter of the ambiguities of the Constitution, giving it the power to overturn any law passed by any legislature in the country if it is deemed to be "unconstitutional". It would be wrong, however, to see the Court as simply ruling laws as "unconstitutional" or not, for its judgements on cases it has heard have had far-reaching effects on many Americans. The Supreme Court was brought into being by Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution, "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish". The Supreme Court was originally set up as part of the separation of powers in the American political system, with its independent executive, judiciary and legislature. It was not originally implicitly granted the power of judicial review by the founding fathers, but it could be argued that this power was implied. The Supreme Court actually gained the power of judicial review in 1803 in the case of Marbury v Madison, in which the Supreme Court of the time, led by Chief Justice John Marshall (who is credited in being the major figure in obtaining this power for the Court), declared Section 13 of the 1789 Judiciary Act unconstitutional, an act which Congress did not attempt to overrule. ...read more.

Middle

It is in the interests of the Court to ascertain the public mood when deliberating on a major judgement, for having the weight of public opinion against it is an undesirable state of affairs for any area of government to have but, more importantly, the Court has to make sure that it does not antagonise another branch of government too much. Happily, there has not been a major challenge to the Court's authority in recent years, despite it having ruled against a President in this period (U.S. v Nixon (1974)). The Supreme Court, though its moral authority is widely recognised now, has not been without challenges to its judgements, and one of the best examples of this is the Dred Scott v Sandford (1857) case. This case is one of the most famous cases in the history of the Supreme Court, as it was one of the main reasons for the Civil War. In this case the main issue was whether or not the southern states had the right to classify blacks in law as property and deny them citizenship. The actual case brought to the Supreme Court by Dred Scott, a slave, was whether a black slave could become a citizen of the United States by living in a part of the country where slavery had been forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. The Supreme Court ruled that he could not and "that the compromise (which prohibited slavery north of 36 degrees and 30 minutes) was an unconstitutional deprivation of property and a denial of due process of law" (Bowles,1993:268). Following the civil war, of which this case was a major factor in causing it, this Supreme Court ruling was overturned by two Constitutional amendments, the Thirteenth and Fourteenth, whereby slavery was abolished and blacks were allowed to become U.S. ...read more.

Conclusion

Because of their life tenures Judges are allowed to follow a more independent line than a member of a party could. The only way they can be removed from the Court is by impeachment, as set out in Article 3 Section 1, "The Judges...shall hold their offices during good behaviour". They are paid a salary for their job, with a large pension so that they can retire from the Court and still live extremely comfortably. It also sets out on Article 3, Section 1, that their salary "shall not be diminished during their continuance in office", taking away from Congress the power to withhold their salaries if the Court passes a judgement which is not acceptable to Congress. The Supreme Court fulfils many roles in American politics; legislator, arbiter, maker of public policy and interpreter of the Constitution. It is the most powerful court in the world, unelected in a system characterised by elections, with the power to subject every law passed in the nation to scrutiny. It is not unchecked, however, for public, congressional and public opinion holds it in check, for moral authority can only be sustained as long as there is no wholesale deviation from the norm. To conclude, the Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in the American political system, acting both as a part of the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances. Its day-to-day rulings may not arise much as much interest among the American people, but whenever a major, contentious issue needs to be resolved, the Supreme Court will usually play a role in determining it, for as Associate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes commented (in McKay,1993:249) "We are very quiet there but it is the quiet of a storm centre. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. 'The Supreme Court has too much power for an unelected body' Discuss

    The doctrine of judicial review empowers the Court to declare any law or action of a governmental institution to be unconstitutional; again, this is a highly significant power. The power of judicial review extends beyond constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Court also adjudicates alleged violations of federal laws by state laws or by the actions of private organisations.

  2. Produce a report that looks at the functions of each court, with emphasis on ...

    Unlike the inferior courts in the civil process the High Court has some jurisdiction in criminal law and can hear appeals on a question or fact of law from the Magistrates' Court, this function will be looked at when examining the courts in the criminal process.

  1. Law and moral.

    Sometimes this is quite explicit: Hoffmann LJ said in Airedale Health Authority v Bland [1993] 1 All ER 821, for example, that whether a patient should be allowed to die is not an area on which any difference can be allowed to exist between what is legal and what is morally right.

  2. The separation of powers in the English Legal System. The Supreme Court would respect ...

    The government has introduced the Constitutional reform act (2005) which is a proposal for the new Supreme Court2. The separation of the judiciary will be implemented, meaning that the same person would not be involved in more than one function of government and that one function would not control or interfere with another function e.g.

  1. ''A system of coercion imposing norms which are laid down by human acts in ...

    but also all non-legal extraneous matters are to be considered as adulterants. Kelsen insisted on the total rejection of those elements of psychology, sociology and ethics which had found their way into jurisprudence. Such 'alien disciplines' had attracted the attention of jurists because they dealt with matters which might be perceived as having a close connection with the law.

  2. Philosophy, Political Morality and History: Explaining the Enduring Resonance of the Hart-Fuller Debate 3

    When met to an adequate degree, this 'inner morality' guaranteed a law worthy of 'fidelity', underpinned the existence of an obligation to obey the law, and marked the distinction between law and arbitrary power. Furthermore, Fuller claimed, Hart's own position could not consistently deny some such connection between law and morality.

  1. The government is proposing to create a supreme court and to reform the judicial ...

    Finally the new court can hear more cases than the older House of Lords. Disadvantages of the Supreme Court: A major concern of certain Judges at present is that implementation of the new measures has been too rushed, affecting long standing traditions without proper consideration.

  2. Judicial accountability

    It consists in doing the actions by which...a democracy will be enabled to survive...The democrat starts by assuming that justice consists in equality; he proceeds to identify equality with sovereignty of the will of the masses; he ends with the view that 'liberty and equality' consists in 'doing what one likes'...this is a mean conception of liberty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work