• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why are opportunity reduction-based approaches to crime prevention attractive to policy-makers and what are the main problems associated with their theoretical bases and practical implication?

Extracts from this document...


Why are opportunity reduction-based approaches to crime prevention attractive to policy-makers and what are the main problems associated with their theoretical bases and practical implication? First this essay will explain what is meant by opportunity reduction based approaches (ORBA). It will give reasons why these approaches are attractive to policy makers and link this to a broader political context. The theoretical base will be examined in relation to social construction and also pointing out what crimes this approach doesn't address. The practical implication of ORBA are analysed such as the problem of displacement and the inequality this highlights. Then finally the uses, abuses and human rights issues regarding certain aspects of the technology associated with this method of crime prevention. ORBA are part of situational crime prevention which manipulates the environment as a method of trying to prevent crime. Situational research is divided into two measures, (1) increasing the chances of being caught and (2) reducing physical opportunities for crime (Clarke 1980). It is the latter that this essay is primarily concerned with, although the two measures do overlap. For example, installing closed-circuit television (CCTV) will reduce the opportunity for crime and increased the likely hood of being caught. Cohen and Felson (1979) ...read more.


He suggests the reason for this is because it is easier to provide a leaflet with the advice to avoid certain areas, or check the back seats of cars than it is of advising women about 'trustworthy men. Bright (1991) comments that 'while situational crime prevention, theoretically, can reduce the estimated 70% of recorded crime thought to be opportunistic, it is unable to prevent many violent crimes such as some categories of assault, domestic violence, child abuse and racially motivated crime' (quoted in Walklate p316). Of course this also links back to again to why ORBA are attractive to policy makers as it is easier to provide legislation for public areas and also public crime is visible and it makes more political sense to tackle crime which the public can see. This means that opportunity reduction based approaches are theoretically and practically limited to attempting to prevent crime in the public domain. In the practical application of ORBA's there is the issue of displacement to consider. Displacement is based on the concern that if a criminal is prevented from committing a criminal offence in one place, he simply moves on to another. In other words there is a concern that the problem hasn't really gone away. ...read more.


To summarise, this essay explained ORBA as a method of crime prevention which is attractive to policy makers because it was simple and could be targeted at certain public area's, it also put the responsibility of crime prevention onto government agencies but mostly on to the victims who invited criminals by inadequate security. Currie (1991) argues that the market society actually perpetuates crime and Young points to capitalism as the expression of upper class fear. ORBA focus of crime is on the public area, this mean it misses crime in the private sphere. The practical application of ORBA brings the unfinished, and possibly unanswerable, issue of displacement and the inequality that this highlights. Finally the issue of advancing technology brings with it the issues of human rights and abuses for which the debates can't keep up, despite this there are positives to these technologies. In conclusion, I think ORBA are a good idea primarily because they do give people a sense of security which allows people to go about their daily lives in the public domain. Although until these defenses are available to everyone and the debate surrounding them has caught up to the technologies, then they remain the property of those can afford them and are also open to abuse. There is also the worry that crime measures will go too far and then we find ourselves in a Big Brother house scenario with every move we make scrutinized. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Critical analysis of three main defences of voluntary manslaughter for women defendants who kill ...

    "Battered women syndrome and defences to homicide: where now?" Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, Vol. 14, No. 2 (1994) - relies on author's text of landmark Canadian case of Lavallee.p.273 31 Schneider, E. "Equal Rights to Trial for Women: Sex Bias in the Law of Self-defense (1980)

  2. To what extent can it be argued that 'youth crime' is a social construction?

    For example worries about hooliganism are most commonly associated with the 1970's onwards yet the term was actually coined in 1898 (Muncie, 1999) 'It is a truism that juvenile crime and the petty and not so petty delinquencies of youth have been a central concern in society from time immemorial' (Shore 2000).

  1. Intellectual Property –Copyright.

    Harry and Robert can seek for an injunction against the Scandalous phone-in service to refrain it from publishing the tapes or to stop using them. They can also claim damages or account of the Scandalous profits whichever they think is more reasonable in this occasion if Scandalous has already commenced

  2. In this assignment, we must assess the admissibility of various aspects of evidence in ...

    [The right to silence is] Often cited as a prime example of fairness of the English criminal system, being intended to protect the innocent, it has been criticised as unduly hampering the conviction of the guilty and has therefore recently been modified.

  1. Lon Fuller - professor of Jurisprudence at Harvard.

    seemed to preclude a coherent dialogue from emerging between him and the legal positivists. These "starting points" include the conception of law as a dynamic process of creation and discovery. In his continuing emphasis upon customary law, i.e. spontaneously evolved rules emerging through dispute arbitration and adjudication combined with the

  2. "For my part, I do not think that the time has yet arrived when ...

    Clearly he has gone beyond his intentions and narrowed the possibility of claiming an interest and added to the entrenched criticism of the 'common intention constructive trust'.4 One is left to wonder how Lord Bridge justifies this approach? Since he is attempting to clarify the law, it would seem appropriate

  1. What is the nature versus nurture debate? How is this related to causal explanations ...

    He suggested that typical criminals had smaller brains, heavy jaws, abnormal and asymmetrical skulls, projecting ears and a crocked or flat nose. Further more they were often colour blind, left handed and physically weak. Lombroso even suggested that different types of criminals had different physiologies.

  2. Criminology: The Effects of Crime

    This would not be possible if certain characteristics or behavioral traits were not commonly perceived as deviant, antisocial, or criminally related. Regardless if a person is a victim of a crime, witness of a crime, or is only aware of a crime, the person or people are now affected.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work