A pivotal point in the play is Act 3.1 when Tybalt is slain by Romeo. Shakespeare uses the hot blood of youth as a vehicle to reinforce the feud and further distance Romeo from his goal both physically and mentally as he is banished to Mantua, guilt-ridden having caused the death of his new wife’s cousin. He has been forced by social expectations into fighting against his judgement. Their love is in opposition to the decrees of their society and their determination to be together results in their deaths. He protests that he loves Tybalt:
‘But love thee better than thou canst devise
Till thou shalt know the reason of my love
And so good Capulet, which name I tender
As dearly as mine own, be satisfied.’ (3.1.67 - 71)
All reason is forgotten when hot headed Tybalt, defending his family’s honour, fights with Mercutio and slays him whilst Romeo attempts to part them. Mercutio in his dying speech curses both families:
‘A plague a both your houses!’ (3.1.106)
Is this Shakespeare’s way of directing blame away from fate and towards the real culprit which is man made?
The viciousness and dangers of the play’s social environment are a dramatic tool employed by Shakespeare to make the lovers’ romance appear even more precious and fragile. Many critics attribute the cause of the tragedy to fate and indeed this could be considered a contributory factor as the series of accidents that ruin Friar Lawrence’s well intentioned plans and Juliet waking only moments after Romeo’s death would seem to indicate this. On the surface these events would seem to be coincidences but none of these devices would have occurred if the Montagues and Capulets did not hate each other. It is possible to see Romeo and Juliet as a battle between the responsibilities and actions demanded by social institutions and those demanded by the private desires of the individual. Romeo’s and Juliet’s appreciation of night, symbolic of privacy and secrecy, and the renunciation of their names, symbolic of loss of social obligation, show that they wish to escape from their public world. But they cannot stop daylight returning nor can they stop being Montague and Capulet because the world will not allow it. In this way Shakespeare justifies their suicide as the ultimate night, the ultimate privacy and the ultimate escape from the conflict.
In Mercutio’s Queen Mab speech, are we possibly seeing an alternative opinion of society? The words ‘quean’ and ‘mab’ were references to whores in Elizabethan England. In Queen Mab Shakespeare creates a conceptual pun by alluding to a mythological fairy tradition and attaches to it a reference to prostitutes. The child pleasing image of a fairy in a nutshell coach bringing dreams to sleepers is endearing but, on examination, the dreams are not comforting but show a depraved side to society:
‘O’er lawyers finger’s, who straight dream of fees;…(1.4.71)
Sometime she driveth o’er a soldier’s neck,
And then he dreams of cutting foreign throats,
Of breaches, ambuscades, Spanish blades,’ (1.4.80 –83)
These lines show a darker vision of society. Romeo dismisses Mercutio
‘Thou talk’st of nothing.’ (1.4.94)
Mercutio agrees, saying that dreams are the children of an idle brain (1.4.98).
But Romeo’s visions of love are dreams, Tybalt’s ideals of social standing and honour are dreams and Friar Lawrence dreams of bringing peace to the houses of Montague and Capulet. It would seem that all these desires are delusions. Mercutio’s comment may be seen as debunking the grand idealistic passions of love and family loyalty that animate the play. Surely this speech offers an alternative view of the play’s reality.
In the final scene of the pla, Shakespeare appears to reconcile the two houses as each promises to honour their children’s sacrifice by erecting lavish statues in remembrance of them. But it seems that the fathers are already vying with each other to produce a bigger and better statue than the other,
Montague: ‘But I can give you more;
For I will ray her statue in pure gold,
That while Verona by that name is known,
There shall no figure as such rate be set
As that of true and faithful Juliet.’
Capulet: ‘As rich shall Romeo’s by his lady lie
Poor sacrifices to our enmity.’ (5.3.299 –304)
Maybe this will be a future reason for rivalry.
In summary, Shakespeare has incorporated many of the conventions which were acceptable to his audience. The ideals of masculine honour, pride and status are likely, particularly in young men, to erupt into conflict and would have been commonplace in Elizabethan society. In fact the play is littered with dead bodies. Paris dies for Juliet, Romeo dies for Juliet, Mercutio dies for the Montague family, Tybalt dies for the Capulet family. The reasons for the hatred and feud are never revealed. All of these deaths are as a result of honour not nature. Romeo and Juliet’s dilemma is a direct result of their parents' conflict and Shakespeare by his use of Petrarchan poetry makes his audience understand their pain. Thus the feud almost represents an extra character within the play, influencing the behaviour of every character. It is not fate alone which causes the inevitable tragedy but the feud which causes their sad fate.
Bibliography
McEvoy, S. (2000) Shakespeare: the basics, London, Routledge
Levenson, Jill L. (ed) (2000, 2nd edn) The Oxford Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet. Cambridge, Oxford University Press.
BBC Television Shakespeare: Romeo and Juliet 2004