How are the historic ‘Joan Makes History’ scenes related to an understanding of the story of the continuing narrator ‘Joan’ in Grenville’s Joan Makes History?

Authors Avatar

How are the historic ‘Joan Makes History’ scenes related to an understanding of the story of the continuing narrator ‘Joan’ in Grenville’s Joan Makes History?

The central character is nothing more than a relatively small and narrow minded, over-opinionated, self interested character full of emboldened self righteousness, yet immoral to some extent and possessing many undesirable qualities.  The scenes show Grenville’s careful and if not unorthodox and somewhat lifelike development of the character through the lives of many different women, and all the same - named Joan.

The structure of the book is laid out in the beginning in a seemingly random pattern.  One scene is her conception, next she is a living woman ready to leap to the shores of Botany Bay, while next she is being born, next she is married.  This continues noticeably until approximately scene 8, where she is in all ways fully matured (keep in mind only physically, her character is still in desperate need of some adjustments) and the scenes fit together, the only difference being in times and places, e.g. Chapter 2, Scene 9 (meaning the second part of scene ‘x’) where Joan is pregnant to Duncan which carries through to Scene 10 where she is pregnant to Ken, gives birth and then the story in Chapter 2, Scene 10 has Joan’s baby Madge as an infant to Duncan again.  This is the prolific moment where the narrative of the text forms some kind of logic to the reader and can grasp a more logical understanding of Joan’s development.  Before that the “events, ... seem inconsistent with what precedes them and thus are ultimately unsatisfying.” (Griffith, p. 115)

“Writers of fiction must build conflict into their worlds...” (Griffith p. 28) and while this is true in the case of Grenville’s book, Joan is of little use to those situations.  While proclaiming to be of “fire and flame” (Grenville, p. 230)  there is little evidence to support this notion.  It seems when something ‘hard’ is put in her way, after her initial brave efforts in the novel, when there is a reasonable challenge in sight, she moves from it.  Throughout the scenes she goes from a self proclaimed (and note, only self proclaimed, there are no other characters in this book who fully support her notion of making history)  history maker to an old woman who contradicts her own self.  That will be addressed herein after.  

Joan’s marriage to Cook isn’t a seemingly interesting tale to the historical reader.  While it would be one’s guess that all Australian’s know who Captain Cook is, this chapter relates specifically to a significant time and place (much the same as the Opening of Parliament much later on in the novel).  It clutters the readers notion of the historical with the fiction. We know that “the most obvious difference is that writers of fiction can make up facts but that historians must take facts as they find them.  In works of history, historians cannot manufacture facts to fill in the gaps of their knowledge.  Consequently, the fictional world is potentially more complete and coherent than the historical world.  Not only can writers of fiction produce fact at will, they can produce them to fit a coherent plan.” (Griffith, p. 28)  This is shown clearly by Grenville since we know that Captain Cook’s wife Elizabeth did not accompany him and in that time, a woman  on board a ship such as that (primarily research and exploration) would never have been allowed.  The growth of Joan’s character in these early chapters is marginal and only shallow in their development.

Join now!

Scene 3, is from the perspective of Aboriginal Joan.  In the scheme of Joan’s development throughout the entire novel, in this particular scene she lacks cultural recognition and respect of her peers.  Grenville dealt with this chapter callously and so out of context that this only mars Joan’s expansion.  In Joan’s character there is almost a racism in the level of stupidity portrayed about the Aboriginals, this proving to be inaccurate and merely at surface level.  

A noticeable trait of Joan’s is her ability to ‘know’ about other people, from prying, gossip, first hand accounts or some ...

This is a preview of the whole essay