• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lord Jim, Modernism and Colonialism

Free essay example:

EN 4880B Modernism & Empire

Mid-Term Essay

Shivaranjani Subramaniam

U051096U

Lord Jim,appearing just at the turn of century, can be easily glossed over, due to the novel’s maritime backdrop, as belonging to travel literature that was popular in fin de siècle England. However upon delving deeper, the novel’s modernism manifested through aspects like the different viewpoints and as such a fragmented story, its self-reflexivity and the poetic nature of the prose, rescues the novel from such a quick and unjust gloss (Klages 165). For the novel does not glorify the journeys that the West undertook in the late nineteenth century in the name of exploration or the Empire- it rather, through its modernist aesthetics, undermines them. Keeping in mind how late nineteenth century literature on the empire “was effectively a literary and visual form of pro-imperial propaganda”, Lord Jim makes a clean break from that genre preciselybecause Conrad juxtaposes colonialism and modernism (Levine 121). Considering what the abovementioned modernist aesthetics comment upon colonialism and how colonialism itself is complicated in the text, this paper will show how Lord Jim avoids being labeled as pro-imperial propagandistic literature.

Modernism actually does not just comment upon colonialism- it approaches the latter in a whole new way. The binarism or Manicheanism that normally holds colonialism in place and even justifies it, collapses in the face of modernism because the aesthetics of modernism allow it to present not one universal way of looking at the colonized subjects or colonial journeys, but rather a multitude of ways.

An aspect of modernism which is outstanding in Lord Jim is the fragmentary nature of the story. Seen from different points of view, including an omniscient narrator in the first four chapters, the novel offers as such, different takes on colonialism. The typical Manichean way of approaching the Other is epitomized by the omniscient narrator, as we are introduced to the pilgrims first through his omniscient standpoint, wherein they are divest of individual consciousness and appear as one large group homogenized by their religious beliefs. The description of the pilgrims starts with “they streamed in urged by faith” and after seeming to giving credit to their religious conviction, the description ends by describing them as “unconscious pilgrims of an exacting belief”. The narrator thus not only reduces and ridicules their religion and, the extents to which they would go for it, but clearly displaces such faith as belonging outside Western space for the pilgrims were “coming from north and south and from the outskirts of the East”. They were, like the German skipper says, “cattle” and “human cargo” or body parts such as “a dark hand” or “a throat bared and stretched as if offering itself to the knife” for even their body parts suggested their vulnerability to the colonizer’s subjectivity.

But as the viewpoints change, so does the portrayal of the Other and in relation, the take on colonialism and the journeys undertaken in its name and alleged good cause. Some viewpoints, like Captain Brierly’s, are still reminiscent of the narrator in the first few chapters, for he likens the pilgrims to “old rags in bales”. It is in fact, Brierly’s viewpoint that exposes the artifice of the civilizing mission behind colonialism that it was not in service of the native but rather, self-serving in nature.

We must preserve professional decency…We are trusted…We aren’t an organized body of men, and the only thing that holds us together is just the name for that kind of decency  

Their sense of duty as such does not extend to the natives but to themselves, and to the image they have carefully fashioned for themselves- as masters, as protectors, as brave men.

Viewpoints like Marlow’s and Stein’s similarly shed new light on the matter of colonialism. The religion which is scoffed at by the omniscient narrator is validated by Marlow who suggests that

It was as if the Omnipotence whose mercy they confessed had needed their humble testimony on earth for a while longer, and had looked down on make a sign, ‘Thou shalt not!’ to the ocean.

Though in the end, Marlow attributes the ship’s ability to float to “tough old iron”, his suggestion temporarily confounds the secularity of the Western thought. After all, the pilgrims too had placed their trust in “the wisdom of the white men”, “their courage”, “the power of their disbelief” and “the iron shell of their fire-ship” - three components of the White man’s power had failed them so why would a product of that power withstand the squall if not for divine intervention? Marlow’s speculation thus forces the Western mind to consider this other possibility.

Stein’s remark made to Marlow as why to Man was not a masterpiece not only reveals his viewpoint but also poetically sums up Man’s flaw:

Sometimes it seems to that man is come where he is not wanted, where there is no place for him; for if not, why should he want all the place?

The flip side of the colonial enterprise is exposed through this viewpoint as it fleshes out greed as being the driving force behind colonial journeys and pits colonialism’s unwelcomed intrusive nature against its civilizing mission.

However, it is not simply a case of approaching colonialism from different viewpoints. What is modernism inherently trying to do with colonialism? Why did Conrad not simply, if he was trying to be sympathetic to the other side, posit one firm way to look at colonialism? Paul Kintzele puts forth the claim that “Lord Jim pushesthe reader to choose, to make a judgment” and this paper contends, there is truth to this statement. For therein lies the spirit of modernism and the novel’s spectrum of viewpoints to approach colonialism- it begs the reader to choose wisely which viewpoint to align oneself to. It does not dictate a moral position but engages with our moral reasoning. The self- reflexivity of the narrative comes in here to jar the reader and to prevent any such propaganda. When Marlow pauses in his storytelling either to move or directly address his group of listener, it reminds the reader of the novel that one is receiving a story, not a truth. When the text issues poetic philosophical statements, we are compelled to contemplate them, and in line with colonialism, this particular poetic statement that

“That kind of thing” was only endurable and enduring when based on a firm conviction in the truth if ideas racially our own, in whose name are established the order, the morality of an ethical progress

compels the Western mind to question the moralist view that imperialism claims to take.

Before going on any further, let us first consider how colonialism itself configures in the novel. Colonialism enters Lord Jim in the form of the pilgrims and more importantly, as the island of Patusan and its people. Colonialism however, complicates the text because, the denouncement of the enterprise exists side by side with its validation- again, the novel does not dictate but merely straddles both positions.

The novel’s title does not read ‘Jim’ but ‘Lord Jim’, thereby ousting the ordinary water-clerk and chief mate Jim and lauding the “virtual ruler” of Patusan. Jim could confidently anticipate a “magnificent chance” to finally be a hero and predictably, Patusan’s terrible political climate gives him that chance to become one. Even Marlow lapses into Manichean description to portray the situation for amidst the “dark-faced men”, Jim stood out in his “white apparel” and with his “gleaming…fair hair [that] seemed to catch all the sunshine”. Marlow muses that Jim must have appeared extraordinary, as though “descended upon them from the clouds”

In becoming a hero, Jim then seals his prophecy to Marlow that “you [Marlow] shall hear of me”, and in turn justifies the colonist’s belief that the native needs the colonist. This is furthered by Doramin’s worry that Jim would leave because the “white men…come to us and in a little while they go…those they leave behind do not know when to look for their return”.

While Jim too ends up colonizing Patusan in that he can exert influence upon it and his status as “Tuan Jim” reinforces colonial binarism, his reasons behind going to Patusan is starkly contrasted with that of Gentleman Brown’s whose intent is purely exploitative. Brown is basically renowned because of his colonial exploits and though, Jim related to the pilgrims his “missed chance” and now relates to the Patusan folks as his “magnificent chance”, Brown’s unscrupulous and deviant ways alleviate Jim’s own selfish but harmless reasons.

However, as aforementioned, this validation of the colonial enterprise exists side by side with its denouncement. Patusan gets introduced to us with an account of its history and we learn how it has been exploited for pepper by colonialism. The passage does not paint the colonists as explorers or saviors but as greedy merchants who have stripped Patusan of its resources and abandoned it- in the satirical tone of the passage (“It made them great!...it made them heroic…it made them pathetic too) lies the criticism too.

The novel in fact, does more than denounce the colonization of foreign land and people- it endows both the land and people with active power, an aspect that is snatched away from them in the act of colonialism. For example, the novel not only illustrates how the Patusan folks need Jim but how Jim needs them as well. Marlow astutely points out how “all these things that made master made him captive” and “it was they that possessed him and made him their own”. So the novel subverts normal power relations that accompany colonialism.

The space itself comes to signify more than just land to conquer and rule or exploit; it becomes a land which rehabilitates and gives a second chance. It is juxtaposed really, for just as the pilgrims “at the call of an idea” and “upheld by one desire” leave behind home, Jim for a similar call to redeem himself and that “missed chance”, leaves behind the sea and settles on land, foreign land at that. Patusan, that liminal space which exists “outside the sphere of its [mankind’s] activities” and is of “no earthly importance to anybody but [to] the astronomers” becomes then home for Jim, jus as the East Indies provided Stein with a home away from home. Marlow in support of this, paints Western soil as being exacting of those who return home for “going home must be like going to render an account”. Jim cannot go back home because as Marlow points it out

The spirit of the land, as becomes the ruler of great enterprises, is careless of innumerable lives. Woe to the stragglers! We exist only in so far as we hang together

But Patusan draws in the West’s rejects and while he no longer exists as Jim of the seas, he exists as Tuan Jim of Patusan.

Klages claims that

Many modernist works try to uphold the idea that works of art can provide the unity, coherence, and meaning which has been lost in most of modern life; art will do what other human institutions fail to do (165-166)

Was that what Conrad was trying to accomplish in juxtaposing colonialism and modernism in Lord Jim? Does modernism provide “the unity, coherence and meaning” for the reader? By presenting all sides of the imperialist agenda and its repercussions, this paper is inclined to agree with Klages. The modernist aesthetics of multiple viewpoints, the fragmentary nature of the novel, the self-reflexivity and the poetic prose proposes to the reader that truth is in reach but it requires rigorous revision and questioning of reality as they see it- is someone else’s suffering underlying the prosperous reality that one is experiencing?- history as they know it.

(1946 words)

Works Cited

Kintzele, Paul. “Lord Jim: Conrad's Fable of Judgment”. Journal of Modern Literature   25. 2 (Winter 2001-2002):69-79. JSTOR. NUS Lib., Singapore, 20Sept 2008.

<http://www.jstor.org>

Klages, Mary. Literary Theory : A Guide for the Perplexed.New York: Continuum, 2006.

Levine, Philippa. The British Empire: Sunrise to Sunset. Britain: Pearson Education Limited, 2007.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Authors section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related University Degree Linguistics, Classics and related subjects Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related University Degree Other Authors essays

  1. In Crime and Punishment, both Sonya and Dunya are the embodiments of Christian virtue, ...

    consider your lot already clearly determined."7 Separating her hopes from her own interests, Dunya believes that by uniting herself in marriage, she will help Raskolnikov complete his education, and to eventually become successful, because, as Pulcheria notes, Raskolnikov's success "is all Dunya dreams about."8 Communicating the sacrifice that Dunya has

  2. In what ways, and to what extent, does Mrs Dalloway illustrate Woolfs intention to ...

    But even more importantly, Septimus's case allows Woolf to launch a sustained attack on the medical community of her time.'4 Woolf used her novel very cleverly; it would seem that Woolf made Mrs Dalloway a mirror that she turned on society, not to ridicule or judge but to question.

  1. Assess the extent to which Great Expectations is a realist novel

    Pip?s realisation that it is Joe is who is a good and honest man despite his social standing serve to illuminate for the reader the importance of a person?s morality over their positioning in society again mocking the values of class-based society.

  2. An Examination of Figurative and Literal Debris in J.G. Ballards &amp;quot;Concrete Island&amp;quot;

    However, through interacting with these two, he also gains better sense of his own weaknesses. An important characteristic of Maitland is his detachment from others. To emphasize this, he uses the phrase ?emotionally loaded transactions? when describing his relationships with Helen, Catherin, and his mother (Ballard, Concrete, 83).

  1. Feminist Consciousness in Hemingway's &amp;quot;Cat in the Rain&amp;quot;.

    It is also widely known that there is totally no female figure in The Old Man and the Sea. In this short story, where does Hemingway?s feminist consciousness come from? On the one hand, the main cause is the impact of his family.

  2. Du Bois theory of propaganda and African American media portrayal is supported by events ...

    Evidence of this media influence on Bigger is seen when he gets a job with the Daltons, he is completely unable to be himself. All he can do is act out the role of the subservient and poor black man that he has seen in countless popular culture representations.

  1. Comparing Julian Barnes A History of the World in 10 Chapters to Elisabeth ...

    Allow me the freedom to quote you two passages from the text. The first is from ?Parenthesis,? the ?half? chapter in the novel. This fragment is taken from a passage where an Indian tribe is described which thrived, so that the Indians had a lot of time on their hands.

  2. Two different Jamesian heroines: Daisy Miller and Catherine Sloper

    After a brief description of setting the story of Daisy Miller begins with an "I". The "I" refers to the unnamed character who acts as a first person limited omniscient narrator limited to the point of view of Winterbourne. As a consequence, the reader cannot view all the descriptions as all-knowing and finite.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work