• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Morphological structure variation - Italian, English, Swahili and Chinese the languages considered

Free essay example:

Practice essay:

Explain, with reference to appropriate examples, how morphological structure can vary between languages.

  1. Introduction

According to Bauer (1988 : 248), morphology is “the study of the ways in which lexemes and word-forms are built up from smaller elements, and the changes that are made to those smaller elements in the process of building lexemes and word-forms”. In morphology, the words of a language are classified into nouns, verbs, adjectives, and a few other classes.

In this paper, I will concentrate more on the structure and on the properties of nouns and verbs in order to analyse, depending on the type of language, how morphological structure vary between languages.

I will also take a look, regarding nouns, to morphological variation, and, regarding verbs, to verbal inflection.

But before doing so, I must say that languages are classified on the basis of their morphological characteristics, even though there can always be exceptions [overlappings]: hence, we have isolating, agglutinative and fusional languages. Chinese, Swahili and Italian belong respectively to each one of these categories, while English represents a “particular case” in its morphological characteristics.

Languages as Chinese do not have a morphology, because there are no changes in the internal form of a Chinese word: thus, there is no distinction between a word and a morpheme.

The case of agglutinative languages, instead, is the opposite: in Swahili, one of the most widely spread languages of Africa, for example, a single word is characterized by more morphemes, which can be easily separated.

Italian, as well as other Indo-European languages, belongs to the category of fusional languages, where a single morpheme can express more than only one meaning and where there are plenty of examples of allomorphs, (two or more complementary morphs which manifest a morpheme in its different phonological or morphological environments).

  1. Nouns

According to Gibbon, English nouns are composed by a stem and an inflection.

A stem, like “table” or “hand”, has a lexical meaning, and relates a word to its syntactic (through subject-verb agreement) and semantic context. It can be simple or complex, like “beautiful” (stem + derivational affix), “armchair” (stem + stem), “bus-driver” (stem + stem + derivation).

Inflexions of English words are suffixes, like the “–s” of the plural, stem vowel changes, as in “foot-feet” and prefixes, as in “unhappy”.

In Italian, as Ranta points out, nouns have the parameter of number. Each noun has two forms, the singular and the plural. Italian has a small number of noun declensions: if a noun ends with “-e”, as piede (foot), its plural form will end with “-i”, piedi (feet); if a noun ends with “–a”, as testa (head), its plural form will end with “–e”, teste (heads); finally, if a noun ends with “-o”, as testo (text), its plural form will end with “-i,” testi (texts).

In Swahili, as Myachina (1981 : 22) argues, nouns are divided into classes by logical correlation: thus we have the class of objects, the class of human beings, the class of animals, the class of trees; a class can be also determined by mutual relationship of two objects in space. Swahili has altogether 15 classes. Each class has a different set of prefixes for marking numbers (singular and plural), e.g., mtoto "child", watoto "children".

Regarding Chinese language, Packard (2000 : 69) believes that, depending on the free-bound position of a morpheme and on its content-grammatical property, four types of morphemes can be distinguished: function words(grammatical and free morphemes) as “hé” 合 (Conj.), root words (content and free morphemes), as ng(ice), bound words (content and bound morphemes), as diànnǎo 电脑, electic-brain (computer) and affixes (grammatical and bound morphemes).

It must be said that only root words and bound words may be stems and word heads, while only root words may stand alone as free words. In the category of affixes, we can distinguish between word-forming affixes (which may be heads as well), as “wú-” 无 (not) and grammatical affixes, as “-men” , the plural affix.

Morphophonemic alternation

        Languages which are characterised by morphophonemic alternation show variations in the phonemic and/or morphological shape of their morphemes, showing the presence of allomorphs.

For example, both English and Italian have this characteristic: nevertheless, while in English examples of this type are less common, in Italian are much more common. In English examples are the plurals “-es” and “-s” as in buses /iz/ or girls /z/; the plural of “-f”, which is “-ves”, as in “wives”; in Italian many examples can be taken from nouns like psicologo /psi’kolo:go/ (psychologist), which assumes different shapes depending on the context. Thus, we find psicologi /psi’colodЗI/ (psychologists), psicologico /psiko’lodЗi:ko/ (psychologic), or psicologia /psikolo’Ia/ (psychology), where the lexical morpheme /g/ becomes /dЗ/. Another example can be also taken from the adjective b[‘ε]llo (beautiful) and b[e]llino (fairly beautiful), where the difference between the two vowels is justified by phonological reasons.

Morphophonemic alternation in Swahili is due mainly to palatalisation and labialisation. Palatalisation of consonants arises where the high front vowel i is present. Thus, in a variety of Swahili suffixes we can find the shift n > m before labials, e.g. n + -buzi > mbuzi; or the shift k > ch /t∫/ before i + a, as in ki + angu > changu.

In Chinese, it is easy to deduct that there is no morphophonemic alternation, since every morpheme is isolated and there is no grammatical agreement.

However, this does not mean that in Chinese grammatical values and functions do not exist in Mandarin: as Bauer (1988 : 131) points out, there is a set of grammatical morphemes in Mandarin with serves to mark nouns with grammatical cases, as bèi 被for the nominative or agentive.

  1. Verbs

Verbal inflection

English verbal inflection is not that rich: in fact, for almost all verbs, there is only one change, adding -s or -es for third person singular, only in the Present Tense: “He listens”. All other persons require no changes to the verb: “I dream”, “You dream”, “We dream”, and “They dream”.

In Italian, the situation is rather different: verbs are inflected in mode, tense, number, and person, so we have different forms for each person. An example may be the Indicative present tense of the verb mangiare (to eat): io mangio (I eat), tu mangi (you eat), egli mangia (he eats), noi mangiamo (we eat), voi mangiate (you eat), essi mangiano (they eat).

Besides, as an example of fusional language, a single Italian morpheme can encode various meanings: take a look at the 3rd person singular Past Tense of the verb amare (to love), amò: this verb encodes the 3rd person, the singular, the Past, the Indicative and the Active form at the same time.

Regarding Swahili verbal system, Myachina (1981 : 46) argues that the Swahili verb consists of more elements, as: a significant verbal base; preverbal concords in agreement with the class of the subject and the object; and tense, aspect and modal markers. An example can be mwanafunzi anasoma kitabu (the pupil reads the book), where “a-” is the subject concord of the 3rd person singular, agreeing with the class 1 noun mwanafunzi, “-na-” is the Present Tense marker, and “soma” (to read) is the significant verbal base. In Swahili, every morpheme can be easy separated: an agglutinative language is easily recognizable by this characteristic.

In isolating languages as Chinese, word order and particles shape the syntax and the meaning of the words, what inflection does in agglutinative and fusional languages.

Chinese verbal system, in fact, lacks verbal inflection, since its verbs do not change form, relying on word order, context or some kinds of morphemes to convey meaning: I will go is simply literally translated into “tomorrow (it depends on the speaker) I go”,ming tian wo jiang hui qu 明天我将会去 or “I bought a bookis translated with mai le yi ben shu 买了一本书, where the morpheme le is the Past Tense marker.

In Chinese, it is possible to divide words into morphemes, while in English it can create ambiguity (Bauer : 130): for instance, the denotations of “know”in knowing a person, a proposition, and a language are sufficiently different that they can be translated into three different verbs in other languages. This is the reason for which English cannot be classified as a fusional or an isolating language, as it shares sometimes some properties with the former and sometimes with the latter.

  1. Conclusion

The knowledge we have about our native language is innate in everyone of us: therefore, find and give explanations is not that simple, and this is why many research and studies have been made in order to understand rules that make languages.

Furthermore, in this paper I did not only talk about my mother language, Italian, but also about other three languages, two of them I have never studied before (Chinese and Swahili).

Ideally, the task of a morphological analysis system would be to break the word down to its component morphemes and determine the meaning of the resulting decomposition.

From this work I understood that foreigners’ language acquisition can be compared to children' language acquisition, since both are starting to learn the rules which make a language and, therefore, they have expectations. However, while English children try to apply the rules of English, foreigners who may not know them, tend to apply the rules of their own language: hence, we can hear a Chinese speaker saying “tomorrow I go” or a person who speaks Swahili saying “I eat it the apple”, putting 2 objects referring to the same argument.


Bauer, Laurie (1988), Introducing Linguistic Morphology, Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.

Gibbon, Dafydd (2006-2007), Introduction to Linguistics: Morphology - word construction,B.A. British And American Studies. [Online] (URL http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/~gibbon/Classes/Classes2006WS/IntroductionToLinguistics/05-IntroMorphology.pdf). Accessed 13th April 2007.

Myachina, E. N. (1981), The Swahili Language: A Descriptive Grammar, London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Packard, Jerome Lee (2000), The morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic And Cognitive Approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

Ranta, Aarne, 1+n Representations of Italian Morphology, [Online] (URL http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~aarne/tmp/contributions/ranta/italiano.html). Accessed 15th April 2007.

Houghton Mifflin Company (1996),[Online] The American Heritage, Book of English Usage (URL http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/060.html). Accessed 15th April 2007.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Creative Writing section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related University Degree Linguistics, Classics and related subjects Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related University Degree Creative Writing essays

  1. Case Study of Three Counselling Sessions.

    It was also mentioned that when a silence went on for a time I had not prompted Val in anyway. I totally agree with this, as I don't mind the client being silent. As I think sometimes the client needs time to reflect in more detail about what has been said and what she is feeling at that time.

  2. Observation Number 2 - Family Description.

    photos slowly turning each page using all four fingers of her right hand. Similarly to what I observed in week 1, without her mother's presence she portrays an image of a young independent girl indifferent to her surroundings. Thought: I find it very strange that she acts so child like

  1. corpus and concordance in comparing grammar in both speech and writing

    means, show it by the video. In short, Concordance lines demonstrating (play) as a singular verb are 64 in spoken corpus, and 20 in written corpus. The most commonly element precede (play) in spoken corpus is the pronoun you, which occurred 14 times, but in the written corpus is the pronoun we which occurred 3 times.

  2. Discuss the Power of Language and the value of language diversity.

    The death of languages ultimately means extinction of unique cultures. In his book 'Language Death' (2000), British Linguist David Crystal states that there are over 6,000 languages and many of them are on the brink of extinction at an alarming rate - 4% of languages accounting for 96% of people and 25% with fewer than 1000 speakers.

  1. Rules of negation in British Sign Language

    For example, 'I know nothing,' 'she's not there,' I never do homework.' 'I never go out,' 'she's not going.' Negation can also be shown in English by using negative pronouns such as, 'nobody, none,' 'nobody likes the cold weather,' 'there are none in the jar.'

  2. Placing a Biography in the Context of History

    Despite the women's movement in India, the traditional view of a woman being weak and vulnerable still holds.3 "Just going back, getting married, having a couple kids, taking caring of house, being a housewife...," she says pessimistically. She decided to stay in the United States.

  1. Marian is a 37 year old female who appears to be from a middle ...

    and another one, and another one and I, I felt good down there (Co: yeah), you know, um, and she felt good too (Co: hmm), you know if we ran out we would both have to go down and get some more (Co: hmm), you know, even if it was 9 o'clock at night (Co: yeah)

  2. A Sociolinguistic study. Is there such a thing as mens and womens language? ...

    However, people also use hedges to show that they are going to say something important and they want people to pay attention. Also, Lakoff found that women use tag questions more for some purposes. Firstly, tag questions express uncertainty as well as hedging effects.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work