Oppression and frenzy: causes of the French Revolution.

Authors Avatar

OPPRESSION AND FRENZY: CAUSES OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.” The quote describes the spirit of the era in which this story takes place. The age is marked by competing and contradictory attitudes. Whether it was the best of times or the worst of times depended on one's point of view. Yet, these times resembles the present period in which Charles Dickens writes A Tale of Two Cities. In fact, Dickens’ novel was written as a political commentary to inform the people of the Victorian era of the causes of the French Revolution. These causes can be divided into two major categories: hatred for the nobility, and an atmosphere of paranoia, fueled by the sans-culottes, which can be seen in calls for violence.

Evidence for hatred of the nobility is quite extensive. Not seldom aristocrats fell victim to crowd violence, often being mutilated in the process. Nobles inspired resentment and retaliation because they claimed that their political and social distinctions derived from their high birth. Just so, the people of Paris provided much of the force for radical action in the French Revolution.

In France, before the revolution, the social structure had two extremes. The peasants hated the aristocrats for their power and money. For the aristocracy it seemed like the best of times but many lived in a world insulated from what the reality was for the poor: hunger, and unemployment. On the other end of the spectrum, the lower classes did not have any civil liberties and were not allowed to participate in government. This is revealed by a man in a crowd who yells to Monseigneur, “I devote you, to the Devil!” In other words, the aristocrats had “sealed their graves” because they were too cruel towards the lower classes.

        The several chapters that deal with the Marquis Evrémonde successfully paint a picture of a vicious aristocracy that shamelessly exploits and oppresses the nation’s poor. The Marquis Evrémonde is less a believable character than an archetype of an evil and corrupt social order. He surrounds himself with the greatest pomp and luxury. For example, he has four serving men help him drink his chocolate. Dickens uses sarcasm to great effect as he describes the Monseigneur’s ridiculous dependence on his serving men: “It was impossible for Monseigneur to dispense with one of these attendants on the chocolate…Deep would have been the blot upon his escutcheon if his chocolate had been ignobly waited on by only three men; he must have died of two.”

Join now!

Not only overly self-indulgent, he is also completely indifferent to the lives of the peasants whom he exploits. The Marquis orders his carriage to be raced through the city streets, delighting to see the commoners nearly run down by his horses. Furthermore, the Marquis’ lack of sympathy is evidenced as he tosses a few coins for the father of the child whom his carriage tramples to death. In tossing the coins to Gaspard, he aims to buy his way out of the predicament and rid his own conscience of the nuisance of Gaspard’s grief. He believes that it is the commoner’s ...

This is a preview of the whole essay