• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Analysis of the Dialogues in The Last Leaf Based on Cooperative Principle

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Analysis of the Dialogues in O.Henry's "The Last Leaf" Based on Cooperative Principle 1. Main Content and Theme of the "The Last Leaf" Johnsy, Sue and Behrman are three of the impoverished artists. One autumn, Johnsy suffers from Pneumonia. She hasn't any passion for the future life that she depends her life on the ivy leaves outside the window. She believes that the moment the last leaf falls she will die. Her friend, Sue constant nurse and comfort her. One night, during a bad storm destined to tear the last leaf from the tree, Old Behrman, regardless of the cold, wet night paints a vivid leaf on the outdoor vine to restore the dying Johnsy's hope to live. The last leaf kindled Johnsy's life fire again. However, Mr. Berhman died of pneumonia during the night. The Last Leaf speaks highly of the sincere lasting friendship just as the evergreen ivy leaf, and the noble spirit--selfless sacrifice. 2. The Intention of This Article Dialogues between characters in "The Last Leaf" are nearly half portion of the whole story so this article tries to reveal the priceless friendship through analyzing their dialogues based on Paul Grice's Cooperative Principle. 3. Dialogues between Sue and Johnsy "What is it, dear?" asked Sue. ...read more.

Middle

Having failed to get her question answered, Sue(3)asks it gently again despite that Johnsy flouts the maxim of relation. Sue's toleration makes their conversation go on and shows her affection towards Johnsy. Another example is (11): when Johnsy mentions the silly idea of the leaves, Sue violates the maxim of Relation again. Sue refuses to make what she says relevant to Johnsy's silly thought and changed the subject of conversation. She thereby implicates that Johnsy should not be so foolish. When the dying Johnsy asks her whether the doctor told her she would die soon. Sue says (5), "the doctor told me this morning that your chances for getting well real soon were--let's see exactly what he said--he said the chances were ten to one!" what she says is not the same to the doctor's words, "one to ten". So she breaks the maxim of quality: "Do not say what you believe to be false." Sue lies deliberately because she wants to comfort Johnsy, hoping to inspire her courage to survive. Sue's violations above show her sincere affection to Johnsy. All what she says are for the sake of Johnsy. The purpose of her was obviously to make Johnsy cheer up. 4. Dialogues between Sue and Old Behrman Though the true hero, Old Behrman appears only once and speaks twice in the whole story, what he says successfully reveals his affection to two young artists. ...read more.

Conclusion

"Paint?-bosh! Has she anything on her mind worth thinking about twice-a man, for instance?" "A man?" said Sue, with a jews'-harp twang in her voice. "Is a man worth-but no, doctor; there is nothing of the kind." Typically, people use echo questions to indicate that they are not sure whether they have heard or understand what the addresser have said. The two rhetorical questions here, "Paint?" and "A man?", are asked for on purpose other than to obtain the information, as there is no obvious reason to suppose that they haven't heard the sentence clearly, or that it is difficult for them to understand the two easy words. "Paint?" and "A man?" are expressions of feelings--the doctor's surprise and Sue's despise. Moreover, Sue adds another rhetorical question "Is a man worth". Then her implicature is at once made apparent by her saying that "-but no, doctor; there is nothing of the kind." which shows she understands her friend very well and they share with each other the dreams and hopes. From the discussions above, we can see through the dialogues that Sue and Johnsy give mutual help and relief in time of poverty and that Sue is willing to go through thick and thin with Johnsy. And Old Behrman's noble spirit--Saving other people at the risk of his own life. After analyzing dialogues based on Cooperative Principles,we now understand the characters' relationship and its theme better. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Literary Criticism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Literary Criticism essays

  1. Sex, Shame and Guilt: Reflections on Bernhard Schlink's der Vorleser (the Reader) and J

    79). The issue of seeing and being seen is paramount here--and it is a central constituent of the notion of shame. They see one another again at the trial. For days on end there is no exchange of glances between them.

  2. A Structuralist Analysis of Nathaniel Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown.

    I helped your grandfather, the constable, when he lashed the Quaker woman so smartly through the streets of Salem; and it was I that brought your father a pitch-pine knot, kindled at my own hearth, to set fire to an Indian village, in King Philip's war.

  1. Novel Analysis: The Yellow Wallpaper

    This indicates that the ingrained gender-biased social attitude preserves as an inheritance which is passed along and colonizes women. She regards the house as "haunted" and "queer" since it "stood so long untenanted" (p.30). Her delusion seems to be an evidence of her "slight hysterical tendency" (p.30), but actually it

  2. On balance, does The Two Gentlemen of Verona sustain or undermine the idealisation of ...

    We see throughout this play how Proteus metamorphoses his own character, his own mind and feelings towards other characters in the play. Proteus's 'Journey undermines his stability. From faithful friend and lover, he loses his initial firmness "like a waxen image 'gainst a fire" (II.

  1. What and when was the Harlem Renaissance? The Harlem Renaissance was more than ...

    Hughes, Langston and John Henrik Clarke, eds. Harlem a Community in Transition. New York: Citadel Press, 1964. Hughes, Langston, and Milton Meltzer. Black Magic: A Pictorial History of the Negro in American Entertainment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967, 1971. Hull, Gloria. Color, Sex, and Poetry: Three Women Writers of the Harlem Renaissance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.

  2. Lecture X: Symbolism in Dreams. Through a psychoanalytic framework, analyse any one of Freud's ...

    play âa partâ of an implied whole in producing âthe resultâ (line 8) that is the distortion in dreams. There is no stratification of the responsibility of these âpartsâ, but they are all somewhat responsible. This âdiscoveryâ, to borrow the term from line 7, âamounts to our saying that even

  1. From Hobbit to Hero- Frodo's Quest as an Examplary Monomyth

    Tolkien's epic work 'The Lord Of The Rings'. Although Frodo is just one among many other heroes in Tolkien's book, it is primarily considered a âstory of a journey undertaken by Frodo Baggins, a hobbit, chosen mysteriously to return a Ring which has great evil power to the place where it was forgedâ (Barber 1986: 1)

  2. An Analysis of Rip Van Winkle Using Psychoanalytic and Archetypal Criticism

    However, Winkleâs superego suggests that his disappearance is immoral. And yet, he gets a second chance after coming back from the Catskill Mountains. Without any effort, he becomes a respected man; his long absence justifies his political ignorance, and he even becomes a symbol of the village.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work