• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Analysis of the Dialogues in The Last Leaf Based on Cooperative Principle

Extracts from this document...


The Analysis of the Dialogues in O.Henry's "The Last Leaf" Based on Cooperative Principle 1. Main Content and Theme of the "The Last Leaf" Johnsy, Sue and Behrman are three of the impoverished artists. One autumn, Johnsy suffers from Pneumonia. She hasn't any passion for the future life that she depends her life on the ivy leaves outside the window. She believes that the moment the last leaf falls she will die. Her friend, Sue constant nurse and comfort her. One night, during a bad storm destined to tear the last leaf from the tree, Old Behrman, regardless of the cold, wet night paints a vivid leaf on the outdoor vine to restore the dying Johnsy's hope to live. The last leaf kindled Johnsy's life fire again. However, Mr. Berhman died of pneumonia during the night. The Last Leaf speaks highly of the sincere lasting friendship just as the evergreen ivy leaf, and the noble spirit--selfless sacrifice. 2. The Intention of This Article Dialogues between characters in "The Last Leaf" are nearly half portion of the whole story so this article tries to reveal the priceless friendship through analyzing their dialogues based on Paul Grice's Cooperative Principle. 3. Dialogues between Sue and Johnsy "What is it, dear?" asked Sue. ...read more.


Having failed to get her question answered, Sue(3)asks it gently again despite that Johnsy flouts the maxim of relation. Sue's toleration makes their conversation go on and shows her affection towards Johnsy. Another example is (11): when Johnsy mentions the silly idea of the leaves, Sue violates the maxim of Relation again. Sue refuses to make what she says relevant to Johnsy's silly thought and changed the subject of conversation. She thereby implicates that Johnsy should not be so foolish. When the dying Johnsy asks her whether the doctor told her she would die soon. Sue says (5), "the doctor told me this morning that your chances for getting well real soon were--let's see exactly what he said--he said the chances were ten to one!" what she says is not the same to the doctor's words, "one to ten". So she breaks the maxim of quality: "Do not say what you believe to be false." Sue lies deliberately because she wants to comfort Johnsy, hoping to inspire her courage to survive. Sue's violations above show her sincere affection to Johnsy. All what she says are for the sake of Johnsy. The purpose of her was obviously to make Johnsy cheer up. 4. Dialogues between Sue and Old Behrman Though the true hero, Old Behrman appears only once and speaks twice in the whole story, what he says successfully reveals his affection to two young artists. ...read more.


"Paint?-bosh! Has she anything on her mind worth thinking about twice-a man, for instance?" "A man?" said Sue, with a jews'-harp twang in her voice. "Is a man worth-but no, doctor; there is nothing of the kind." Typically, people use echo questions to indicate that they are not sure whether they have heard or understand what the addresser have said. The two rhetorical questions here, "Paint?" and "A man?", are asked for on purpose other than to obtain the information, as there is no obvious reason to suppose that they haven't heard the sentence clearly, or that it is difficult for them to understand the two easy words. "Paint?" and "A man?" are expressions of feelings--the doctor's surprise and Sue's despise. Moreover, Sue adds another rhetorical question "Is a man worth". Then her implicature is at once made apparent by her saying that "-but no, doctor; there is nothing of the kind." which shows she understands her friend very well and they share with each other the dreams and hopes. From the discussions above, we can see through the dialogues that Sue and Johnsy give mutual help and relief in time of poverty and that Sue is willing to go through thick and thin with Johnsy. And Old Behrman's noble spirit--Saving other people at the risk of his own life. After analyzing dialogues based on Cooperative Principles,we now understand the characters' relationship and its theme better. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Literary Criticism section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Literary Criticism essays

  1. Sex, Shame and Guilt: Reflections on Bernhard Schlink's der Vorleser (the Reader) and J

    And that is the beginning of their sexual relationship. If shame and embarrassment mark the beginning of their affair, they also mark its end. There is something utterly clandestine about all their meetings. The last time they see one another during their affair, there is distance between them.

  2. Novel Analysis: The Yellow Wallpaper

    demonstrates her suspicions about the unfair but ignored social norms on women just like the tenantless house. However, even the house is not her domain, the upstairs room is. The locked room is a nursery and symbolizes the oppression enforced by her husband's paternalistic behavior which makes the narrator far from the outside world.

  1. A Structuralist Analysis of Nathaniel Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown.

    As they go, the Devil upsets Goodman Brown by telling him that his ancestors were religious bigots and cruel exploiters. The elder man/Devil says, "Well said, Goodman Brown! I have been as well acquainted with your family as with ever a one among the Puritans; and that's no trifle to say.

  2. On balance, does The Two Gentlemen of Verona sustain or undermine the idealisation of ...

    We see throughout this play how Proteus metamorphoses his own character, his own mind and feelings towards other characters in the play. Proteus's 'Journey undermines his stability. From faithful friend and lover, he loses his initial firmness "like a waxen image 'gainst a fire" (II.

  1. What and when was the Harlem Renaissance? The Harlem Renaissance was more than ...

    Harris, Trudier, ed. and fwd., and Thadious M. Davis, ed. Afro-American Writers Before the Harlem Renaissance. Detroit: Gale, 1986. ---. Afro-American Writers from the Harlem Renaissance to 1940. Detroit: Gale, 1987. Harrison, Daphne Dural. Black Pearls: Blues Queens of the 1920s. Princeton, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988. Harrison, Paul Carter. The Drama of Nommo. New York: Grove, 1972.

  2. Lecture X: Symbolism in Dreams. Through a psychoanalytic framework, analyse any one of Freud's ...

    if the dream-censorship was out of action we should still not be in a position to understand dreamsâ (line 9, 10). Therefore, not only does the distortion of dreams, which is a result of the censoring activity, âinterfereâ with the âunderstandingâ of the dreams, but even if this interference was

  1. From Hobbit to Hero- Frodo's Quest as an Examplary Monomyth

    Petty (1979: 32) argues that âthe call works subtly in Frodoâ and he already grows kind of restless before he learns more about his quest. However Campbell (1966: 52-53) further mentions that the call to Adventure is often brought to the hero by a an announcer, which he calls 'herald'.

  2. An Analysis of Rip Van Winkle Using Psychoanalytic and Archetypal Criticism

    We realize that his 20-year sleep has only cost him his wife. Maybe thatâs what he always wanted: to live a carefree life, without working, taking care of children, or having an intimate relationship with a person he never really loved.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work