• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling

Extracts from this document...


The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling


Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling method, compared to random sampling methods, which are known as probability sampling methods. Examples of probability methods are stratifying sampling, cluster sampling, systematic sampling and simple random sampling. When a sample needs to be taken from a population, the issue of which type of sampling method to use arises; probability or non-probability. Since we are looking at specifically quota sampling, we need to define it. Quota sampling involves stratifying a population into mutually exclusive sub-groups, as if using the stratified sampling method. However, the difference is, in quota sampling, judgement is used instead of randomness to select units from each stratum. The number of sampling units chosen from each stratum is based on proportion. Random sampling is defined as when every unit in the population has a probability of being chosen. For a random sample to be carried out, there also needs to be a sampling frame.

Advantages of Quota Sampling

Although quota sampling is criticised heavily by academics, it does have its advantages. The biggest case for it is that is incredibly cheap to carry out. Travel

...read more.


(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

We have to also consider the possibility of bias erupting within the quotas at an individual level, leading to misrepresentations of the population. Take for instance; there is a quota for over 60 year olds. If the interviewer only finds people who range from 60 years old to around 65, then there is no representation of people who much older than 65 (Moser & Stuart, 1953).

Another example may be that the interviewer doesn’t like to travel to certain places, therefore only interviews people from a certain area, leading to selection bias in the sample. Random sampling doesn’t have this problem; “Random selection is the only selection mechanism in large-n studies that automatically guarantees the absence of selection bias (Epstein & King, 2002).”

Quota sampling also has the problem of non-response bias, a form of selection bias (selection bias is a non-sampling error). If somebody refuses to be a part of a study, then quota sampling allows the interviewer to go and find the next person who is willing, which results in data that is not wholly representative of the population. The reason for this is, that non-respondents probably have certain characteristics, and because the data obtained from the sample will not represent them at all (it will only be representative of respondents)

...read more.


(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

To conclude, there is never going to be a complete dismissal of a particular sampling method. Quota sampling has no theoretical structure; however practicality outweighs its negatives. If a researcher is looking for, “results derived from theoretically safe sampling methods,” then it is safe to say that quota sampling is out of the question (Moser & Stuart, 1953). If there are time and cost constraints to a researcher, then quota sampling can be convenient.



Epstein, L & King, G. (2002). The Rules of Inference. University of Chicago Law Review. 69 (winter), p1-209.

FAO Corporate Document Respository.  Sampling in Marketing Research. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w3241e/w3241e08.htm. Last accessed 6th December 2010.

Lyman Ott, Mendenhall, Scheaffer, (2006). Elementary Survey Sampling. 6th ed. Canada: Thomson.

Moser & Stuart. (1953). An Experimental Study of Quota Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 116 (4), p412-413 & p387-340.

Tansey, O. (2007). Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics. 40 (4), p770.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Statistics essays

  1. Using Statistical Methods to Investigate the Seashore Habitat of Shellfish and Flora + Fauna

    One obvious way to make my results more accurate would be to collect more information.

  2. Hypothesis method

    This is called Type II error, represented by the Greek letter ?. These two errors are represented in the following chart. Figure 1. Types of error Type of decision H0 true H0 false Reject H0 Type I error (?) Correct decision (1-?)

  1. Explaining Research Methods Used by Social Scientists.

    Experimentation allows the pace to be forced rather than waiting for natural events to reproduce the appropriate scenario. Controlled laboratory experiments can yield both qualitative and quantative data and can be analysed using inferential statistics. The technical equipment is readily available and can be used to calculate accurate measurements.

  2. Quantitive Methods - questions and answers

    Question Three A professor teaching Quantitative Methods thinks his is class is performing significantly above average. Historically the grades have been normally distributed with a mean 65 with a standard deviation of 20. He takes a random sample of 30 students in the class and determines that they have a mean score of 69.

  1. Research Methods.

    Table 1 Three Sources of Knowledge of Qualitative & Quantitative Methodology QUALITATIVE QUANTITATIVE KNOWLEDGE 1. Paradigm Knowledge 2. Qualitative Analysis Knowledge 3. Interpretive Framework Knowledge 1. Paradigm Knowledge 2.

  2. Non-Response Bias

    Nonresponse bias is a nonsampling error and thus difficult to estimate. As mention at the very beginning, nonresponse bias is in a way a researcher's nightmare. That is because nonresponse is very problematic. ''Low response rates can lead to inaccurate estimates and large standard errors''(Groves 2007).

  1. Quantitative Analysis for Business.

    < 20 11 19 48 20 < 25 10 29 73 25 < 30 7 36 90 30 < 35 2 38 95 35 < 40 0 38 95 40 < 45 1 39 98 45 < 50 1 40 100 If you plot the cumulative distribution as a graph it is called an 'ogive'.

  2. After careful consideration over the possible investigations that can be carried out with the ...

    This will be an advantage since I will be able to draw up a correct conclusion. PILOT STUDY RESULTS The previous table and its results show the goals scored at the ten minute periods within the ninety minutes of the football match.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work