• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling

Introduction

Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling method, compared to random sampling methods, which are known as probability sampling methods. Examples of probability methods are stratifying sampling, cluster sampling, systematic sampling and simple random sampling. When a sample needs to be taken from a population, the issue of which type of sampling method to use arises; probability or non-probability. Since we are looking at specifically quota sampling, we need to define it. Quota sampling involves stratifying a population into mutually exclusive sub-groups, as if using the stratified sampling method. However, the difference is, in quota sampling, judgement is used instead of randomness to select units from each stratum. The number of sampling units chosen from each stratum is based on proportion. Random sampling is defined as when every unit in the population has a probability of being chosen. For a random sample to be carried out, there also needs to be a sampling frame.

Advantages of Quota Sampling

Although quota sampling is criticised heavily by academics, it does have its advantages. The biggest case for it is that is incredibly cheap to carry out. Travel

...read more.

Middle

(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

We have to also consider the possibility of bias erupting within the quotas at an individual level, leading to misrepresentations of the population. Take for instance; there is a quota for over 60 year olds. If the interviewer only finds people who range from 60 years old to around 65, then there is no representation of people who much older than 65 (Moser & Stuart, 1953).

Another example may be that the interviewer doesn’t like to travel to certain places, therefore only interviews people from a certain area, leading to selection bias in the sample. Random sampling doesn’t have this problem; “Random selection is the only selection mechanism in large-n studies that automatically guarantees the absence of selection bias (Epstein & King, 2002).”

Quota sampling also has the problem of non-response bias, a form of selection bias (selection bias is a non-sampling error). If somebody refuses to be a part of a study, then quota sampling allows the interviewer to go and find the next person who is willing, which results in data that is not wholly representative of the population. The reason for this is, that non-respondents probably have certain characteristics, and because the data obtained from the sample will not represent them at all (it will only be representative of respondents)

...read more.

Conclusion

(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

To conclude, there is never going to be a complete dismissal of a particular sampling method. Quota sampling has no theoretical structure; however practicality outweighs its negatives. If a researcher is looking for, “results derived from theoretically safe sampling methods,” then it is safe to say that quota sampling is out of the question (Moser & Stuart, 1953). If there are time and cost constraints to a researcher, then quota sampling can be convenient.

WORD COUNT: 1235

References

Epstein, L & King, G. (2002). The Rules of Inference. University of Chicago Law Review. 69 (winter), p1-209.

FAO Corporate Document Respository.  Sampling in Marketing Research. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w3241e/w3241e08.htm. Last accessed 6th December 2010.

Lyman Ott, Mendenhall, Scheaffer, (2006). Elementary Survey Sampling. 6th ed. Canada: Thomson.

Moser & Stuart. (1953). An Experimental Study of Quota Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 116 (4), p412-413 & p387-340.

Tansey, O. (2007). Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics. 40 (4), p770.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Statistics essays

  1. Why are longitudinal studies desirable and why are they difficult to undertake?

    implement and therefore can be seen as to why longitudinal studies may be difficult to undertake. (Vaus: 2001) (Miles et al: 1994) (Rose et al: 1993) Many argue that longitudinal studies may be difficult to undertake because there may be deficits in the data analysis.

  2. Research Methods.

    Despite, there are some fundamental differences, they lie primarily at the level of assumptions about research(epistemological and ontological assumptions) rather than at the level of the data. Apparently, the heart of the quantitative and qualitative debate is theoretical, not methodological.

  1. How statistical interpretation can cause data to appear misleading

    Random teams would be selected, and all the players in each selected team would then be studied, rather than selecting a random sample of individuals from the under sixteen netball league. By performing the study in this way, the researcher would be able to identify any relationships between the teams,

  2. Using Statistical Methods to Investigate the Seashore Habitat of Shellfish and Flora + Fauna

    If the correlation is vaguely the same then the hypothesis will be proven, if it differs then it will be disproved. Also I will use a bar chart with the two sets of data on to further prove this hypothesis.

  1. Hypothesis method

    Even when choosing a probability level of 95%, there is always a 5% chance that one rejects the null hypothesis when it was actually correct. This is called Type I error, represented by the Greek letter ?. It is possible to err in the opposite way if one fails to reject the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, incorrect.

  2. Explaining Research Methods Used by Social Scientists.

    Klow&Kennel (1976) In this experiment the independent variable was the random allocation of mothers to one of the two groups following the birth of their infants. In one group, mothers were given extra contact with their new infants; in the second group the infant's acre separation from their mothers until their first feed (the normal hospital procedure).

  1. Quantitive Methods - questions and answers

    The firm should only undertake the marketing campaign in Region B because the 25th Percentile of this region is 29.50, which is less than 30. However, the 25th Percentile for Region A is 30.59 which is higher than 30. Therefore the campaign will not be required for Region A.

  2. Non-Response Bias

    Nonresponse bias is a nonsampling error and thus difficult to estimate. As mention at the very beginning, nonresponse bias is in a way a researcher's nightmare. That is because nonresponse is very problematic. ''Low response rates can lead to inaccurate estimates and large standard errors''(Groves 2007).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work