• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling

Extracts from this document...


The Advantages and Disadvantages of Quota Sampling Compared to Random Sampling


Quota sampling is a non-probability sampling method, compared to random sampling methods, which are known as probability sampling methods. Examples of probability methods are stratifying sampling, cluster sampling, systematic sampling and simple random sampling. When a sample needs to be taken from a population, the issue of which type of sampling method to use arises; probability or non-probability. Since we are looking at specifically quota sampling, we need to define it. Quota sampling involves stratifying a population into mutually exclusive sub-groups, as if using the stratified sampling method. However, the difference is, in quota sampling, judgement is used instead of randomness to select units from each stratum. The number of sampling units chosen from each stratum is based on proportion. Random sampling is defined as when every unit in the population has a probability of being chosen. For a random sample to be carried out, there also needs to be a sampling frame.

Advantages of Quota Sampling

Although quota sampling is criticised heavily by academics, it does have its advantages. The biggest case for it is that is incredibly cheap to carry out. Travel

...read more.


(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

We have to also consider the possibility of bias erupting within the quotas at an individual level, leading to misrepresentations of the population. Take for instance; there is a quota for over 60 year olds. If the interviewer only finds people who range from 60 years old to around 65, then there is no representation of people who much older than 65 (Moser & Stuart, 1953).

Another example may be that the interviewer doesn’t like to travel to certain places, therefore only interviews people from a certain area, leading to selection bias in the sample. Random sampling doesn’t have this problem; “Random selection is the only selection mechanism in large-n studies that automatically guarantees the absence of selection bias (Epstein & King, 2002).”

Quota sampling also has the problem of non-response bias, a form of selection bias (selection bias is a non-sampling error). If somebody refuses to be a part of a study, then quota sampling allows the interviewer to go and find the next person who is willing, which results in data that is not wholly representative of the population. The reason for this is, that non-respondents probably have certain characteristics, and because the data obtained from the sample will not represent them at all (it will only be representative of respondents)

...read more.


(Moser & Stuart, 1953).

To conclude, there is never going to be a complete dismissal of a particular sampling method. Quota sampling has no theoretical structure; however practicality outweighs its negatives. If a researcher is looking for, “results derived from theoretically safe sampling methods,” then it is safe to say that quota sampling is out of the question (Moser & Stuart, 1953). If there are time and cost constraints to a researcher, then quota sampling can be convenient.



Epstein, L & King, G. (2002). The Rules of Inference. University of Chicago Law Review. 69 (winter), p1-209.

FAO Corporate Document Respository.  Sampling in Marketing Research. Available: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w3241e/w3241e08.htm. Last accessed 6th December 2010.

Lyman Ott, Mendenhall, Scheaffer, (2006). Elementary Survey Sampling. 6th ed. Canada: Thomson.

Moser & Stuart. (1953). An Experimental Study of Quota Sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 116 (4), p412-413 & p387-340.

Tansey, O. (2007). Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics. 40 (4), p770.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Statistics essays

  1. Quantitive Methods - questions and answers

    � ? 33.99 The female hair cut price should lie between $25.50 and $34.00 at a 95% confidence interval. 2. Calculate a 95% confidence interval for male haircut price. = $22.54 s = 7.76 n = 20 Degree of freedom, df = 20 - 1 = 19 With a confidence

  2. Non-Response Bias

    Hence conclusions about the population for which the researcher is interested in will be incorrect. Nonresponse will develop nonsamlping errors but it will also increase sampling error because it reduces the sample size. An example of the impact of nonresponse bias is an article published in December 2006 in 'The Times'.

  1. How statistical interpretation can cause data to appear misleading

    depending that the names on the list are in random order (Gratton and Jones (b), 2004). Appendix 3 - Possible Error Techniques Technician error refers to the reliability in the technique of the person researcher, and as the experiment increases, the results become more unreliable (Williams and Wragg (c), 2004).

  2. Quantitative Methods

    which is the lowest compared to other shares. Q2 Compute all the linear correlation coefficients between the series Since there are three shares data, there will be three sets of correlation coefficients: one between Johnson & Johnson and Hewlett Packard, between Johnson & Johnson and American Express, and between Hewlett Packard and American express.

  1. Dress code study. The method of random sampling in this investigation was cluster ...

    is to find out the number of ABC University female students who receive summonses during the period June 2005 to June 2006 and the opinions of the students about whether or not the restrictions should be abolished. We have analysed each of the four restrictions under investigation in details.

  2. Hypothesis method

    Correct decision (1-?) Accept H0 Correct decision (1-?) Type II error (?) Steps in Hypothesis Testing 1 Identify the null hypothesis H0 and the alternate hypothesis HA. 2 Choose ?. The value should be small, usually less than 10%. It is important to consider the consequences of both types of errors.

  1. Does the data indicate that the revised (one week) forecast is significantly more accurate ...

    the error variance, as shown below Source of Variance Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square Quantity estimated by Mean Square Due to regression ==0.0898 1 M1=0.0898 + About regression(error) By difference =0.0085 n-2=8 M0=0.0011 Total =0.0983 n-1=9 Therefore, the value of the error mean square = 0.0011 And

  2. The methods I have used to establish that inequalities exist between different wards in ...

    1 Peace and Quiet 2 2 2 1 Appearance and tidiness 2 2 2 2 Entertainment 1 2 2 2 Levels of crime / vandalism 3 2 2 2 Personal safety / security 2 1 1 2 Reputation of the area 2 1 1 1 Friendliness of the area 1

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work