- Level: University Degree
- Subject: Mathematical and Computer Sciences
- Word count: 1955
Why was an Independent Commission on the Voting system set up?
Extracts from this document...
Introduction
Summary
The Jenkins Independent Commission on the Voting Systems Report sets out the problems of the existing voting system in Great Britain and suggests what they think is the best alternative system.
Although the commission does not go far enough for some electoral reformers, as it does not suggest complete proportional representation. However the Commission’s proposals contain many positive and constructive changes that could be made to the voting system in this country.
The most important features of the report are:
- It suggests a shift towards proportional representation, although the system the Commission suggests is only partly proportional. This has many advantages including the reduction of wasted votes.
- The use of “preference voting” to elect constituency MPs. This means that voters can rank candidates in order of preference, tactical voting in constituencies would no longer be necessary and more votes will count towards the results.
- Top-up lists to elect MPs at a small regional level. This would introduce “open lists” so voters can choose between candidates on party lists, MPs would maintain a form of constituency list even though the area they represent is slightly larger.
- It suggests that the electoral system in Great Britain should be reviewed and checked on a continual and regular basis.
1.Why was an Independent Commission on the Voting system set up?
Politicians and Political Scientists have always made proposals for Electoral Reform in Britain.[1]
The existing system in Britain is majoritarian. The candidate who achieves a plurality of votes wins the seat.
Middle
Conclusion
If the system were effective it would also make the political system in Britain more accessible for smaller parties, for example the Liberal-Democrats and the Green Party. They would be able to benefit from the top-up system and people would be more inclined to vote ideologically as wasted votes are reduced by AV+.
The Commission’s Report also makes the important suggestion that the voting system is reviewed and checked on a regular basis by an Independent Commission to make sure that it is effective and efficient. This would hopefully mean that the system could be adapted (if needed) continually so that it remains suited to Britain as the political system evolves.
It is important to note that although the Commission’s report is seen as a step towards reforming the voting system, in Britain four years after the report the Labour government has not implemented it.
Some reformists also believe that the system of AV+ is a mediocre alternative and the only real alternative to First Past the Post is to have fully proportional system.
Word Count: 1,773
Bibliography
The Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System. (1998) Website
www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4090
“The Jenkins Report: The Alternative Vote Plus (AV+)”. The Electoral Reform Society Website: www.electoral-reform.org.uk/publications/briefings/avplus.htm
Jones et al. “Politics UK, 4th Edition” (2001) Pearson Education: Harlow, England.
[1]Jones et al. “Politics UK” 4th Edition
[2] The Jenkins Report (1998) Extract from the Introduction
www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4090
[3] The Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System. (1998) Chapter 9. www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4090
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Computer Science section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month