• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Censorship and Internet Blocking

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lauren Anderson Professor Onega June 10, 2004 Final Research Paper Censorship and Internet Blocking Internet blocking is a software mechanism used for sorting content into categories for the purpose of decreasing accessibility of certain types of content. Congress passed a law in December of 2000 that requires all public schools and libraries to use Internet blocking technology. Being able to access information on the Internet is an important aspect of being a member or our society. Not only is Internet blocking an invasion of our first amendent right, it is not possible to effectively block all offensive material on the Internet. Censoring, whether it is on the Internet or in books, is in direct conflict with the rights provided to American citizens in the First Amendment. Not only does censoring infringe on our freedoms as a member of this society, but it brings into question what should be censored and who should decide? Defining what is obscene and what is not is one of the biggest problems with censoring. Who is to say that something that offends one person or group of people will offend everyone? By calling something obscene it is being defined under legal terms, it does not make any statements about the nature or character or the item in question. ...read more.

Middle

The websites that are blocked is even kept a secret from those using the blocking technology. There is only one blocking company that makes list of the blocked sites available to their customers or the general public (www.eff.org). The criterion that is used to decide what should be blocked is vaguely defined and subjectively applied to everyone who accesses the Internet. Instead of being customized and designed to meet the needs of particular communities, blocking technologies group all Internet users together into one group and provide the same blocks for everyone (www.eff.org). Blocking technology companies make many mistakes in assigning websites to block lists and almost always rely on automated systems for making content decisions. Blocking technologies tend to be error-prone. There are no effective means to check whether a website was correctly assigned to a block list or to override the blocking. There is also no way to appeal the multitude of incorrect decisions made by blocking technology companies (www.eff.org). When the U.S. government requires blocking in public schools and libraries, the government mandates censorship in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitutional guarantees to free expression and freedom of association. Laws prohibiting the production and distribution of child pornography and obscenity already apply to the Internet. ...read more.

Conclusion

The first amendment gives poeple the freedom to say what they think without retributions from those who do not share their opinion. Internet blocking puts a limit on this right. It makes the first amendment mean that people are free to express themselves as long as it is not offensive to others. If something is offensive to someone, they should not look at it. It is not fair to take away one group's rights to appease another group. The national government should not be the one to choose what citizens have access to online. If parents want to block certain websites, that is their prerogative and they should be able to do so in their home but the government should not take these rights away. It is not fair for Congress to pass laws taking away rights that have been stated for years and years in the Constitution. If a school district decides to use Internet blocks they should be able to do so, but they should not be forced because effective blocks will take away many priceless sources of information from their students. People are responsible for what they choose to do, say, and view. It should not be up to the federal government to decide for the country what is suitable online and what is not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Electronic Media Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Electronic Media Studies essays

  1. Impact of Internet on Plagiarism. This paper aims to explore the reasons behind ...

    Due to all the reasons mentioned above and many others, the incidents of cheating are steadily on the rise since the last decade. While a lone instance of plagiarism is negligible, massive increases such as these indicate a self-destructive trend among the student community and are becoming a cause of worry (Lathrop & Foss, 2000).

  2. Nations today, most commonly such as China, Iran, and Burma has become infamous for ...

    It will draw examples from the U.S.'s growing economy relative to internet use and speculate on how China could benefit its economy had it promoted a liberal internet environment. After the given factors are examined, the paper will then explore the campaign involved and how the campaign is necessary for greater success in the fight for liberal internet use.

  1. Cyber Ethics @ Computer Ethics

    In the end, legitimate users suffer along with developers, by subsidizing "illegal" users who use unpaid-for software. The rapidly-growing number of vendors worldwide who choose to protect their software only proves the severity of the problem. Software copy protection makes software more expensive.

  2. This paper intends to provide a framework for thinking, debate and action on the ...

    (Mansfield, 1991) The fear of the "market failure" is the reason why the existence of public science is essential. Under the traditional justification for public funding of research, government action serves to correct a "market failure". The concept of market failure, rooted in neo-classical economic theory, is based on the

  1. Critical review - 'What Just Happened?", a chronicle from the information frontier - James ...

    Postmodernism, itself therefore, represents a "new historical period that has yet to be created". Pirogrine and Stengers argue postmodern theory strives "to reinterpret the universe as being constituted by forces of disorder, diversity and non-linearity. It sees' nature, human beings and the relationship between human beings and nature as holistic"

  2. What in your view, are the main problems involved in attempting to produce policies ...

    While press freedom is not exactly the same as the individual?s right to expression, in a democratic society; the press is immune from direct content regulation but constrained by the mores of the society in which it operates. As such, what can be said and how it can be said

  1. The Tragedy of the Commons - Examining the Free Internet

    Through the Internet, we have access to all sensors - from people's cell phone cameras to sharp images from the surface of Mars or satellite photos from outer space. Man is busy developing a set of technological senses that enables us to keep us informed about anything, anywhere, anytime.

  2. Tate Modern Case Study. The purpose of this research is to analyze the ...

    zone ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS The information gathered in the literature review and the data collected through the interviews showed clearly that there are different reason for people to visit a museum?s website. The interviews results showed that the majority of people who do not consider the website as an important

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work