Citizen Kane Essay

A great film is composed of a series of conventions that make it interesting and enigmatic to watch. A plot is needed so the viewer does not lose interest; realistic characters enable the viewer to identify or form a relationship with them; and good actors need to be well chosen for the respective part. A good film also needs to be visually appealing. With the increasing technology we have today, edits and special effects have a significant impact on the success of the film and when used effectively can transform scenes. Finally, dialogue is another essential feature. A well written script makes a great film and makes it worth seeing multiple times, some films even have lines that have become famous and well known and are repeated by fans.

Citizen Kane ranks to this day as a classic masterpiece of cinematic form, with its many remarkable scenes and performances; it’s cinematic and narrative techniques and in it’s experimental use in photography, editing, and sound. It has been regarded as a milestone in the development of cinematic technique. It uses film as an art form to communicate and display a non-static view of life with techniques that include the use of a subjective camera and unconventional lighting.

I understand however, why it may be hard to consider the film so great, as it is a difficult undertaking for someone of modern generation to watch a film like Citizen Kane. Not necessarily because it's too old, but because it has been hailed almost universally as the single best motion picture ever made. Therefore, whilst the anticipation of seeing a film with such overwhelming acclaim may be quite exhilarating, actually watching it could quite possibly be an intimidating and somewhat disappointing experience. This is not because it is a bad film, in fact, Citizen Kane is a meticulously planned achievement in all areas of film making, yet it would not live up to expectations. The story is slow compared to today's standards, and there is no real Hearst character alive today in which to relate. So the story on the surface is outdated which is why it might be hard for today’s audience to see a film made in 1941 great.                                         The film, budgeted at $800,000, received unanimous critical praise even at the time of its release, although it was not a commercial success, until it was re-released after World War II, and then played on television. The film created controversy before it premiered in New York City, 1941, because it appeared to fictionalize and caricaturize certain events and individuals in the life of William Randolph Hearst - a powerful newspaper tycoon and publisher. The film was accused of drawing remarkable, unflattering, and uncomplimentary parallels to real-life. A gossip columnist Louella Parsons persuaded her newspaper boss Hearst that he was being slandered by RKO and Orson Welles' film when it was first previewed, so the Hearst-owned newspapers pressured theatres to boycott the film and also threatened libel lawsuits. Hearst also ordered his publications to completely ignore the film, and not accept advertising for other RKO projects. However, the title character Charles Foster Kane is mostly a composite of any number of powerful, influential American individualists and financial barons in the early 20th century. By contrast, the real-life Hearst was born into wealth, whereas Kane was of humble birth. Welles' film was the recipient of nine Oscar nominations but with only one win, Best Original Screenplay. With his four Academy Awards nominations, Welles became the first individual to receive simultaneous nominations in those four categories.

Join now!

The innovative, bold film is acknowledged down to many factors, a primary factor being the use of some camera angles and shots which are very effective. Using a wide-angle lens was accredited as it allowed ceilings to be part of the shots, which had not been seen before. It meant that camera angles could be from almost anywhere and not have to account for the lack of a roof. This emphasised the power or weakness of a character, and the mood of a scene thus helped with characterization and atmosphere. This type of shot can be seen when Kane is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay