• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the beginning of 'Ghandi' with that of Robin Hood, 'Prince of Thieves'. What cinematic techniques are used in each to introduce you to the story?

Extracts from this document...


Compare the beginning of 'Ghandi' with that of Robin Hood, 'Prince of Thieves'. What cinematic techniques are used in each to introduce you to the story? Ghandi and Robin Hood, are two very dissimilar films targeting different audiences, diverse plots and opposite central characters; one being the stereotypical heroic, action-packed American family movie; the other an epic account of one man and his country's struggle for independence in colonial India during the 18-1900's. The films beginnings and general meaning will be explored as well as taking note of the director's use of lighting, atmospheric devices, camera positioning and the different paces. The film Ghandi begins with a long camera shot of the sun rising behind the backdrop of fishing boats in shadow, while the tweet of rising birds' sound in the background. This beginning depicts the whole theme of the film; it is symbolic of the dawn of a new era, on the eve of independence. The beginning of Robin Hood is atmospheric as well as exciting preparing the audience for action. The camera slowly roves over the Bayeux Tapestry, an embroidered portrayal of the Battle of Hastings, while the credits roll in front. Orchestral, battle music is played in the background, as a small caption asserting a historical fact connoting Robin Hood existed at the time stated, couldn't possibly be true. This device used by the director, of using a true fact, is intended to make the film seem more realistic and believable. However despite the lack of historical accuracy the audience begin to be drawn into the film and are ready to suspend their disbelief. ...read more.


It is an under shot with the lighting behind, enhancing the largeness and evil appearance of the second guard. As the blade is about to slice the camera swiftly changes position to where the first guard is knelling holding Robin's hand. The music gets louder as Robin pulls the rope. We hear the knife slam down and a wail from the guard, but not Robin. The pace quickens and the music becomes unbearably loud and confusing as Robin snatches the machete from the bench and slices the first guard. The camera shots are changed rapidly as piercing screams, slashing knives and orchestral music sound as Robin and the other prisoners fight their oppressors (the guards). Tension and suspense are at its peak as Robin slashes at the metal chains holding his friend. The camera is at a medium shot, slightly below, making Robin appear taller. The sparks from the machete hitting the metal chains are captured expertly from underneath. The black prisoner calls Robin from behind. The anxiety in the man's voice is prominent as he pleads to be set free. The prisoner behind Robin screams 'the guards are coming'. The atmosphere is charged with nervousness as Robin asks the prisoner why he should set him free. The black prisoner responds, "because if you do not we are all dead men!" This hesitation in action serves to heighten the tenseness to an even greater climax. Robin cuts the rope and all three men depart. Honourable as ever, Robin apologizes to one of the prisoners for not setting him free. ...read more.


This creates a reason for his presence in the film. The director of Robin Hood applied the usual customary mixture of appealing factors to his reproduction: e.g. special effects, popular actors, racial diversity, and all the normal audience pullers. These were all in an attempt to make the film original and modern for a new generation of viewers. Ghandi was in no way a re-make and had never been produced as a movie before, and probably never will be again. It had to be a unique one-off production, which could be used for reference by students etc, of future generations perhaps. The film Ghandi uses no special effects, which illustrates that both films serve different purposes, and are targeted at different audiences. Ghandi begins at the end, at Ghandi's death. Robin Hood begins right at the beginning, with the audience full of suspense as to what will happen. Ghandi isn't a 'quest' film like Robin Hood and has no need to keep the audience, in that particular type of suspense. Both directors use a similar technique at creating suspense, music. Ghandi and Robin Hood are presented as very different heroes. As I've already explained, they both represent diverse characters that demonstrate heroism in different ways. They are both fighting very unalike kinds of 'evil'. Racism and injustice perhaps a lot harder to combat than a rather bizarre Devil-worshipper! Ghandi dies a somewhat disappointing death that doesn't seem fitting to such a great leader of a nation. However Robin Hood isn't shown to die at all. Robin is made out to be almost invincible, while Ghandi is a frail, little brave man who can die simply and quietly like everyone else. By Devon Kennard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Film Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Film Studies essays

  1. Thriller and Suspense Films

    The first in a successful series of suspenseful, special agent 007 James Bond films, begun in the Cold-War 1960s and serving as a metaphor for the threat of Communism, was Dr. No (1962) followed soon after by the definitive Bond film, From Russia With Love (1963), and the polished Goldfinger (1964).

  2. The differences and similarities between "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Blade Runner - The ...

    "Blade Runner" has the replicants. These are like human copies but designed to do a specific job such as battle or pleasure. 7"Los Angeles in 2019 as the setting for Blade Runner (1982) is made more convincing by the addition of high tech equipment, flying craft and futuristic gadgets" We

  1. Discuss the Relationship Between Nationality, Generation and Gender in The Prisoner Of The Mountains

    he is laughing with the hostages, we also know that he killed his wife's lover after an affair. After time goes by though, Sascha's snappy temperament mellows and we begin to warm towards him although the blatant disregard for his own life is confusing at first.

  2. To what extent is the Matrix a piece of cinematic entertainment, and to what ...

    When asked to remove any metal items they open their long jackets to reveal masses of guns. They then go on to fight many security guards. This is good because when they open their jackets you are both shocked and amazed.

  1. Three reviews of Boyz N the Hood.

    The film is described as suffering from an "excess of Marrow" meaning the film contains too many important issues on which the director is described as getting "Lumpy" on. The word lumpy is used metaphorically; the reference to the sense of touch is employed to imply imperfection.

  2. "Comment on the techniques and devices used in a particular film trailer(s) and on ...

    In this particular trailer, voice over is not used. This can however be very useful in trailers, mainly to explain the nature of the film and also the main plot. In Gladiator however, dialogues of main characters, and also that of other characters are used to outline the main plot.

  1. With close reference to the opening scene and two other scenes from Blade Runner, ...

    We want to know if it belongs to a replicant or human. We say that the eyes are seen as the 'windows of the soul,' then what are the eye's emotions. In the eye, fire and darkness are reflected, so is this indicating that it is a dark and miserable being?

  2. The Lord of the Rings, the Fellowship of the Ring.

    I think the use of humour overall lightens the atmosphere in the film, as without humour, the film would be very serious due to the nature of the story line. There were many parts of the book that were left out or changed to accommodate for the film.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work