Media Control

Media Control vs. History

        Cash flows freely on deceptive propaganda campaigns flashing beyond front groups and think tanks to sell wars, trash organic agriculture, smear activists as terrorists, tell the public that mad cow disease is no big deal, and push right-wing policy agendas.  As society became free from a military state and more democratic than a totalitarian state, the public relations industry could no longer resort to a bludgeon over the head of society to rein their ideology to conformity.  Then the environment was ripe for the birthing of propaganda.  Propaganda is clearly the alternative to bludgeoning in a totalitarian state.

Media History -- During the period between World Wars I and II, a list of common rhetorical techniques was developed for propaganda purposes.  The list included euphemisms, bandwagon, glittering generalities, name-calling, plain folks, and fear to name a few.  Today, in the 21st century, our history is being written midst a decade of media mergers producing a web of business relationships that now define America’s media culture.  Though massive and complicated, the mergers offer a colossal opportunity for cross promotion and the selling of products along with talent among different companies owned by the same influential parent corporation.

National History or Global History -- The first modern government propaganda operation was under Woodrow Wilson who was elected President in 1916 on a platform, “Peace Without Victory,” that would rock the world from pacifists to a hysterical movement wanting to destroy everything German.  With confidence up, the progressive intellectuals proceeded to whip up a hysterical Red Scare and took great pride in showing the more intelligent members of the community how they were able to drive a reluctant population by eliciting jingoist fanaticism.

        The global commercial media system works to advance the cause of the global market and to promote commercial values while denigrating journalism and culture if it was not conducive to the bottom line of corporate interests.  But until the 1980s, media systems in general were national in scope with broadcasting systems and newspaper industries domestically owned and regulated.  

Media Control vs. Censorship

“America’s mainstream mass media basically serve three segments of society today – the wealthy, politicians, and the sports-minded.”  Propagandists utilize multiple propaganda techniques in order to influence the opinions of the public and to also avoid the straightforward truth.  These techniques savor of censorship and manipulation as significantly important information is omitted or fused with deceit.  They are hardly distinguishable from the persuasion techniques employed in social, religious and commercial affairs.  So is censorship an intentional act?  Images of zealous governmental censors impress on us that it is.  Perhaps it’s a difference between latent forms and overt forms of censorship.  

Join now!

Censorship of Stories – It is impossible to measure the negative impact that the media has had on modern civilization because of a stiff upper lip from the press and journalists failing to warn about the link between smoking and cancer as early as 1938; the baby formula manufacturer’s greed causing thousands of Third World infant deaths; and the lack of car safety features.

Censorship of Sources -- The cycle between media owners and managers who are motivated to please advertisers and the journalists and editors who are not immune for management influence all say and report and slant for personal ...

This is a preview of the whole essay