RACISM IN THE MEDIA

Introduction

Mainstream media across the world have been accused of 'virtually whitewashing' the airwaves. Many ethnic minority groups claim to experience hostility, marginalisation and discrimination regularly from many media institutions. There is an endless struggle for minorities to gain professional access to the media, as the monochromatic view of black people as scrounging immigrants, dysfunctional families, drug-dealing thugs and pimps fails to go away. Factors such as state-ownership, Trans-National Corporations and major advertisers have transformed the creative sphere of the media into a capitalistic, profit-obsessed empire, and view the role of the ethnic minority as a hindrance to ratings and the status quo themselves. Commercialism and capitalistic structures are taking over the media's promise to be creative and democratic.

Racism in the media is not a process of name-calling or stone throwing, but it is a noticeable lack of ethnic minorities participating in the media and the way in which they are excluded from structures of the media. Many English speaking communities maintain their cultural control through mainstream media with a peculiar form of professional standards called 'our style our standard'. These keep out well qualified first generation ethnic migrant journalists and broadcasters from mainstream media. British and American media institutions, which broadcast into Asia, use Asian faces with American or British accents to present news programmes, which are produced by white journalists from a Western perspective. These 'token' programme presenters never rock the boat in

terms of programme contents (Seneviratne, 2000). Media institutions reply in the usual, non-chalant fashion:

"It's become a no-win proposition. Unless you're putting on an hour-long show about a black brain surgeon helping Third-World children, you're insulting the race". (Jackson, 2000)

Prior research has shown that minority characters are under-represented and are portrayed by the media in a negative fashion. African Americans for example, have typically appeared in minor roles, in low status occupation, lacking high school qualifications and generally overweight. By doing so, both under-representing and typecasting minorities, the media are solidifying stereotypes, which then impact upon the public perception of minorities. The results are threefold. This not only hinders the public's ability to view the world unreservedly, but it impinges on the ethnic communities right to democracy and it also sacrifices the integrity and morality of the mainstream media.

In this essay, I will examine 15 articles dealing with the topic of 'Racism in the Media''. I will investigate whether the marginalisation of ethnic minority groups is confirmed by their omission from print and broadcast realities. The essay will be thematically structured, exploring four main themes: Public (Mis)perception, Stereotyping Minorities, Over/Under-Representation of Individuals and 'It's not Racism, it's Economics'. I felt the topic of racism was of utmost importance because I feel there is a phenomenon of racism manifesting itself in our democracy, and subsequently in our own media institutions. The fundamental human right to democracy and free speech is being broken, and as a UN High Commissioner for

Human Rights once said, 'Today's violation of rights are the causes of tomorrows conflicts'. For example, the Civil War in Bosnia was an ethnic war partly initiated by media-induced Serbian nationalism, and the role of radio in Rwanda's ethnic slaughter is constantly being challenged. The media's indulgence in 'foreigner-bashing' serves to reproduce racist ideologies and these only serve to intensify the fundamental problem of racism (van Dijk, 2000). The media, as we will see, are an inherent part of the problem.

Review of Literature

Public (Mis)perception

'Our opinions cover a bigger space, a longer reach of time, a greater number of things that we can directly observe. They have, therefore to be pieced together out of what others have reported' - Lipmann (Gilens, 1996)

The media are our primary source of socialisation and everyday information. The media is, for most people, the only contact they will ever have with politicians, celebrities, sporting heroes, and victims of crime or poverty. However, 'to report is to construct' (Husband, 2000) and what the public perceives as reality is actually the media's constructed version of social reality. The 'bias' of a text translates into the 'mental bias' of the public and therefore, media discourses affect social beliefs, racist ideologies and prejudices (van Dijk, 2000). Dixon et al (2003) explain how these discourses are affected - negative stereotypes of African Americans in the media are perpetuated in viewer's minds. The presentation of more African American than White law-breakers on the news make viewers believe that there social world is populated by dangerous African Americans. The activation of the stereotype, they continue, increases the likelihood that this knowledge will be used in subsequent judgements.

Muharrar (1998) takes a related perspective. He found that TV viewers were so accustomed to seeing African American crime suspects on local news, that even when the race of a suspect was not specified, viewers still recalled seeing a black suspect. A good example here is a study undertaken by Gilens (1996). He shows how poverty in America is viewed primarily as a black problem. He says when the US public estimated that 50% is made up of Black people, it is a good example of how they dramatically misunderstand the racial composition of Americas poor. The truth is that Blacks make up 29% of Americas poor. Pictures of poor African Americans appeal to editors as 'a readily recognisable form of poverty'. Gilens says that if an editor wants a picture that is easily identified as poor, and believes that readers strongly associate poverty with black people, then he/she will use it. The media's proportion of black poor people will undoubtedly mirror that of the public's perception. For example, in Washington and Oregon, black people constitute only 6% of the poor, yet residents of these states believe that the American poor are 47% black. However, Gilen does not believe that this may not be a conscious process of editors.
Join now!


Similarly, Ferguson (2000) does not believe it is a conscious process. 'Media producers are not likely to warm to the suggestion that they may have inadvertently contributed to the shared reserve of racist discourses which are available in societies'. Similarly, Sabo et al (1995) refer to an 'unconscious nationalism' of sports commentators in America. Their study shows American commentators characterising American athletes as warm, fair and humane; referring to their families often and calling 61% by their first name. Contrastingly, they characterise foreigners as more machine-like, unemotional, and cheating; their families are less referred to and calling 41% ...

This is a preview of the whole essay