• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

04 Worker Rights & Working Conditions - Free.doc

Extracts from this document...


Privacy is a cornerstone of our society, as Americans we value privacy above many other natural rights. We each have a right to protect and control certain information about ourselves and who can have access to that information. Our personal decisions should be autonomous and free from illegitimate influence (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p.329). Organizations have a legitimate interest in situations which significantly influence the performance of their employees while on the job, but the understanding of what "significantly influence" means may differ between the employer and their employees. The actions of employers in gaining agreement from their employees to submit to drug testing can be considered coercive when one considers the relationship between the employer and employees. Although the relationship should be one of mutual consent and partnership, the fact that employees may be subject to termination for not submitting to drug testing, makes the consent obtained seem more likely undue coercion (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 364). Employees may feel obliged or even pressured to take a drug test or risk the loss of their job. In these instances, the consent may not be informed. Although we value and guard our privacy, at times it may be necessary to give up that right for the greater good. ...read more.


364). Take for instance a Drug Enforcement Agency officer, if these individuals will come in constant contact with illegal narcotics, it would be prudent to ensure that they do not have a drug addiction and could possibly be a threat to other officers if they began to partner with drug dealers, steal confiscated drugs or could possibly behave in way detrimental to their colleagues due to intoxication. Only in such situations would drug testing be reasonable and morally justifiable. When justifying drug testing as a way to prevent harm, we must consider that most roles do not necessitate the need to be drug free. Employers are only justified in the expectation that their staff perform at a reasonable level. If drug use causes their employees to perform below required norms, than they should attempt to assist their employee in reaching acceptable performance levels or terminate the working relationship. Regardless of the reason for sub-par performance employers have a right to terminate the relationship, but invasion of privacy should not be a means to that end (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 361). Drug testing should not be within the rights or expectations of the employer and should only be engaged when absolutely necessary. When drug testing is deemed necessary, it should be completed in strict compliance with policies which restrict its scope and intrusiveness (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. ...read more.


Companies reason that the use of polygraph testing during the pre-employment process can aid them is screening out potentially costly (i.e.: drug users, the dishonest and the unethical) or inappropriate (i.e.: incompatible philosophies, behavioral patters, character traits for the organization) applicants (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 332). Polygraph testing has not been shown to be 100% accurate (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 330). The inaccuracy of these tests would subject many individuals to unjustified restriction from employment opportunities and cause the organization to potentially miss the prospect of hiring many capable and beneficial staff. Polygraph testing infringes on an individual's privacy in the most intrusive ways. They invade an individual's most private thoughts and beliefs, many of which have no relevance to the job they are applying for. No one can forecast how an individual will perform on their job simply by administering a test that monitors physiological changes during questioning, especially during a usually stressful situation (i.e. interviewing for a job). Even when an applicant submits to a polygraph test or any pre-employment testing for that matter, there may be subtle influence or pressure involved, making that submission less consensual and more coerced (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 332. The applicant has only two choices, submit to the test, or go look for a job somewhere else. When economic restraints are involved, there really is no choice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Miscellaneous essays

  1. The three core conditions of Carl Rogers are easy attributes for the Person Centred ...

    Counsellors must not avoid or deny their true feelings in order to achieve congruence, another difficult feat but an important one to accomplish since many triggers, sensitivities or prejudices are unconsciously driven.

  2. Housing Risk Assesment

    Appendix 1 Original Surveyors Report This two storey 1850's house is in a radon-affected area. It is built with random rubble stone, rendered walls and has a variety of floor constructions. It was converted in 1980 to provide two self-contained flats.

  1. The Ethics of Animal Testing

    Cardiovascular disease affects 3.5million people in Australia alone, most of which benefit from such discoveries as open heart surgery, heart valve replacement and the development of artificial hearts- all of which would not be possible without animal testing (Committee to Update Science, 2004).

  2. " 'The law may protect disabled children's and young people's rights but it does ...

    in their own right, with their own symptoms, worries, coping strategies, and as with any other child, personalities. Lewis and Kellett write "..professionals and academics, as well as parents and families, have emphasised the need to see the child or young person first and foremost, rather than the disability...".

  1. Food Standards Agency Traffic Light System

    think, feel, reason, and select between different alternatives (e.g., brands, products); * The psychology of how the consumer is influenced by his or her environment (e.g., culture, family, signs, media); * The behaviour of consumers while shopping or making other marketing decisions; * Limitations in consumer knowledge or information processing

  2. Free essay

    Essential oils which contain suitable antifungal activity

    The lipophilic properties of oil constituents might have furthermore aided in the proficiency of the oil to penetrate the plasma membrane (Knobloch et al. 1989). The facts made with lightweight and electron microscopy are in agreement with preceding investigations in which absolutely crucial oils of aromatic plants initiated the morphological alterations on the fungal hyphae (Bianchi et al.

  1. Do Institutions Matter: A Case Study of Gun Control

    Firstly there can be the issue of generalisation in comparative research; 'One of the primary problems in comparative analysis is not only the ability of researchers to understand adequately cultures and societies different from their own, but more specifically, to generalise and explain social relations across societies and social contexts.'

  2. Contract acceptance and termination

    only conclude the contract when it is received by the offeror (Collins 1997: 157). Therefore, Jack's acceptance could not have been evident until Alice had gone to work. This may be seen in the case of Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 All ER 493, CA.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work