• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

04 Worker Rights & Working Conditions - Free.doc

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Privacy is a cornerstone of our society, as Americans we value privacy above many other natural rights. We each have a right to protect and control certain information about ourselves and who can have access to that information. Our personal decisions should be autonomous and free from illegitimate influence (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p.329). Organizations have a legitimate interest in situations which significantly influence the performance of their employees while on the job, but the understanding of what "significantly influence" means may differ between the employer and their employees. The actions of employers in gaining agreement from their employees to submit to drug testing can be considered coercive when one considers the relationship between the employer and employees. Although the relationship should be one of mutual consent and partnership, the fact that employees may be subject to termination for not submitting to drug testing, makes the consent obtained seem more likely undue coercion (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 364). Employees may feel obliged or even pressured to take a drug test or risk the loss of their job. In these instances, the consent may not be informed. Although we value and guard our privacy, at times it may be necessary to give up that right for the greater good. ...read more.

Middle

364). Take for instance a Drug Enforcement Agency officer, if these individuals will come in constant contact with illegal narcotics, it would be prudent to ensure that they do not have a drug addiction and could possibly be a threat to other officers if they began to partner with drug dealers, steal confiscated drugs or could possibly behave in way detrimental to their colleagues due to intoxication. Only in such situations would drug testing be reasonable and morally justifiable. When justifying drug testing as a way to prevent harm, we must consider that most roles do not necessitate the need to be drug free. Employers are only justified in the expectation that their staff perform at a reasonable level. If drug use causes their employees to perform below required norms, than they should attempt to assist their employee in reaching acceptable performance levels or terminate the working relationship. Regardless of the reason for sub-par performance employers have a right to terminate the relationship, but invasion of privacy should not be a means to that end (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 361). Drug testing should not be within the rights or expectations of the employer and should only be engaged when absolutely necessary. When drug testing is deemed necessary, it should be completed in strict compliance with policies which restrict its scope and intrusiveness (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. ...read more.

Conclusion

Companies reason that the use of polygraph testing during the pre-employment process can aid them is screening out potentially costly (i.e.: drug users, the dishonest and the unethical) or inappropriate (i.e.: incompatible philosophies, behavioral patters, character traits for the organization) applicants (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 332). Polygraph testing has not been shown to be 100% accurate (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 330). The inaccuracy of these tests would subject many individuals to unjustified restriction from employment opportunities and cause the organization to potentially miss the prospect of hiring many capable and beneficial staff. Polygraph testing infringes on an individual's privacy in the most intrusive ways. They invade an individual's most private thoughts and beliefs, many of which have no relevance to the job they are applying for. No one can forecast how an individual will perform on their job simply by administering a test that monitors physiological changes during questioning, especially during a usually stressful situation (i.e. interviewing for a job). Even when an applicant submits to a polygraph test or any pre-employment testing for that matter, there may be subtle influence or pressure involved, making that submission less consensual and more coerced (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 332. The applicant has only two choices, submit to the test, or go look for a job somewhere else. When economic restraints are involved, there really is no choice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Miscellaneous essays

  1. Housing Risk Assesment

    The current household comprises the mother and father and their three children, two girls aged 13 and 11 and a boy aged 9 years. Background: The flat generally is in a poor state of repair.

  2. The three core conditions of Carl Rogers are easy attributes for the Person Centred ...

    originating from counsellors internalising the feelings of significant others, or transferring unfinished business. It is important for the counsellor to listen to their own feelings as well as the client's. Bringing vulnerability to counselling may demonstrate that the counsellor is caring and human, but this message can be either affirming

  1. Food Standards Agency Traffic Light System

    A focus group is a group interview or debate lead by a moderator who continues the flow of the discussion involving all participants. The main basis for a focus group is to gather information in a relaxed and non-confrontational format.

  2. " 'The law may protect disabled children's and young people's rights but it does ...

    participant competent enough to partake in research, but by excluding them jeopardises both the ethnicity of the project and the reliability of the results, and I will discuss this in more detail later. However, it could be argued that the able-bodied researcher could look at the research less dispassionately, and

  1. Free essay

    Essential oils which contain suitable antifungal activity

    absolutely crucial oil constituents that the terpenoids could hinder with the phospholipid bilayers of membranes as before discerned by Knobloch et al. (1989) on isolated bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. The harmful effect of absolutely crucial oils that we discerned on the hyphae of fungal pathogen S.

  2. Do Institutions Matter: A Case Study of Gun Control

    (Pettigrew, 1990, p. 268) The question of whether institutions matter will inevitably explore policy change and so as Pettigrew points out the longitudinal aspect of the case study can provide a good source of analysis in relation to this. There are understandable limitations to this method of research which can be considered.

  1. Support Workers

    Who also abides by ethical and moral principles (NHS Connecting for Health) It is very important within the care sector that they demonstrate professionalism, by staying within the dress code by wearing the correct uniform. In relation to the 'Health & Safety Act 1998' for the safety of the patients and yourself no jewellery is to be worn.

  2. Personality Testing in the Workplace

    Since the broad acceptance of the Big 5 - or some variant of such - as the dominant model of personality traits (i.e., Extraversion, Agreeableness, Emotional Stability, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience), these issues have been resolved (Mount and Barrick, 1995).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work