Critical Analysis of Two research papers

Authors Avatar

Methods of Enquiry Assignment

MSC Forensic Accounting

Paul Senior

Student ID: 14031395

January 2008


CONTENTS

                Page(s)

  1. Introduction                3
  2. Paper One                4
  3. Paper Two                8
  4. Conclusions                11
  5. References and Bibliography        12

Appendices

Appendix One – ‘Football information services: fanzines, Match of the Day and the modem’

Appendix Two – ‘Emerging trends in the use of the Internet – lessons from the football sector’


  1. Introduction

Research, as defined by the Collins Gem English dictionary (2004), is a ‘systematic investigation to discover facts or collect information’.   Expanding on this definition, Collis and Hussey (2003, p1) quantify research as, ‘a process of enquiry and investigation, that it is systematic and methodical, increases existing knowledge, and requires you to be thorough at all stages’.

There are a number of research techniques available to a researcher and the methodology used will be dependent on a number of different factors, such as the kind of topic you are covering, the results you wish for, and the type of analysis you wish to undertake following the receipt of your results.  

An individual’s personality may also determine the kind of research they wish to carry out, for example a shy person may not be keen on the humanistic approach and therefore would probably carry out research via non face to face contact, such as via a questionnaire or survey.

The objective of this assignment was to select two papers that used differing methods of research, and critically evaluate both of the articles in relation to the different characteristics of the research processes used.   The articles selected were taken from two different journals.  

The first article I chose was from the ‘Aslib Proceedings’ journal - ‘Football information services: fanzines, Match of the Day and the modem’ a paper by Green (1999).  The second article was a paper by Beech, Chadwick and Tapp (2000) on ‘Emerging trends in the use of the Internet – lessons from the football sector’.  This paper is from ‘Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal’.

Throughout this paper I will review the methods chosen by both researchers, analysing and reflecting on their suitability, considering if any alternative methods would have been better suited to the research and in the final section, I will summarise my findings.

 


  1. Paper One - ‘Football information services: fanzines, Match of the Day and the modem’

The first paper I reviewed, as seen in appendix one, was a research paper by Green (1999).  The intention of Green’s study was to research the ‘quantity, quality and types of information services available’ in the football sector, and to gain opinion on whether the information provided was meeting demand.  

The paper used a positivistic approach to its study of football clubs and supporters.  Using a quantitative method to collect the data, questionnaires were mailed to all 92 England and Wales based football clubs, and a smaller sample (72) was handed out to football supporters.  

In the paper, there is a brief statement on the methodology used, and this gives the reader information on how the research was structured, although it does not go into detail why this methodology was selected – this is a failing itself as the methodology section should ‘explain how the problem was investigated and why particular methods and techniques were used’ (Bell, 1993, p155).

The methodology chosen to obtain the data is important and questionnaires were chosen as it allowed the researcher to concentrate on specific, set questions that would allow statistical analysis following the return of the questionnaires.  The nature of the study shows that the researcher selected the correct method of research – that being basic research, as there is no specific emphasis on solving a problem – only collecting information.

The research was split into two parts, with a specific questionnaire issued to the 92 league clubs focussing on the information services that they provide.  In this sample, the clubs were also asked about their perception towards official and unofficial sources, such as fans forums and football magazines.  

A second questionnaire was then issued to supporters, and was distributed in London and Manchester giving the North/South perspective on the results.  72 questionnaires were issued, with questions ranging from what sources of information do the fans use, which services should their clubs provide, to how often they sought the information and how much they paid for it.

From the 164 questionnaires issued, 80 were returned, giving an overall return of 48.7%.  This is a typical rate of return, as the average response rate to paper based questionnaires is between 30% and 50% (Baruch, 1999; Dillman 2000).  When broken down even further, it shows that 52 returns were from the football clubs (57% response rate) whereas only 28 were returned from the supporters (39%), which is deemed as a small response rate (Dillman, 2000).  In this case, it’s usually advised to seek additional sources of data to substantiate the research (Thomas, 2004).

Join now!

The first problem with the chosen method of research is that the number of questionnaires issued is comparatively low if you consider the amount of football fans in England and Wales.  The paper details that a 1997 study by Bradford and Reeve outlined that there were over 18 million football fans in England and Wales.  A positivistic approach is usually used when selecting large samples (Collis and Hussey, 2003, p55).  

So immediately, you can see that the chosen sample of only 164 is not a very large representation; in fact it covers less than 0.001% of football ...

This is a preview of the whole essay