The Fantasy of the Dark Materials

Authors Avatar

Firoozalizadeh

Abstract

In this study, I intend to examine Philip Pullman’s well-known trilogy, The Dark Materials, to approve its genre as being fantasy and to find out to which class of fantasy it belongs.  

In order to achieve my purpose, first of all, I am going to give a general explanation about fantasy. Then, three different definitions will be discussed which are presented by the most famous theorists in this field: Tzvetan Todorov, Eric Rabkin, and J.R.R. Tolkien. Although this genre was classified for many times by different writers and every time a new classification has been created, I have just chosen the one which is the most important one from my point of view: Modern fantasy and postmodern fantasy. Their borderline will be clarified by explicating their different features.

After giving an account of the novel, the discussed rules and definitions will be applied to the novel. Finally, it will be concluded that Pullman’s Dark Materials is one of the best postmodern fantasy ever written in the children literature.

 

Introduction

Fantasy is so widespread in the early literature of every culture- from Egypt, Persia, to Rome and west- that it is impossible to separate it from the greatest fairy tales and ancient legends (Mathews 2). However it is the Romantic Movement’s worship of the imagination and the growing public interest in national folktales that led to the writing of the first true children fantasies by such writers as Lewis Carroll, and George Mac Donald (Manlove 167). William Morris and George Mac Donald are the first ones who start writing fantasy as a modern literary genre in mid-nineteenth century (Mathews 16). Morris publishes his first fantasy stories in 1856 and Mac Donald’s novel Phantases appears in 1858. Shortly after Morris and Mac Donald begin their fantasy writing in 1850s, the publication of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland extends the possibility of this type of fiction by introducing a kind of children book which even attracts the grown-up’s fully attention (17). Since then lots of other books as children’s fantasies are published: Hans Christian Anderson’s “The Snow Queen”, and Carlo Collodi’s Pinocchio. Therefore, the children’s literature has proven to be an enduring influence on adult fantasy (17).

The first step for entering the territory of fantasy is to find out its definition.To clarify which kind of work can be called a fantasy has been always the matter of argument and challenge. The important point is to decide where the border between fantasy and reality should be drawn.

Generally speaking, most critics believe fantasy is a kind fiction that evokes wonder, mystery, or magic (1). So, as it is concerned with magic, we can easily conclude that it does not require any logic and reason to explain about the actions of the characters and the twists of the plot (3).

Although this approach toward defining fantasy is acceptable, it is not convincing. It is a very broad definition and can include many realistic works in which there is a small trace of magic or mystery (4). So, it is better to peruse this subject matter through three different perspectives which are presented by three influential masters of fantasy’s theories.

Tzvetan Todorov and Fantasy

Todorov argues that fantasy’s fundamental departure from realism creates a moment of hesitation in which one cannot determine whether a narrative work belongs to the realm of “uncanny” or to the realm of the “marvelous” (Aichele 3, Mathews 3). The reader of the story always comes across this moment of hesitation:

“The fantastic therefore implies an integration of the reader into the world of the characters; that world is defined by the reader’s own ambiguous perception of the events narrated” (qtd. in Aichele 4)

This type of reader who confronts this problematic choice is not the same historical reader. Instead, he is an implied reader (Aichele 4). The actual reader can never be identified by to the implied reader. However, insofar as the actual reader is unable to identify with the implied reader, there may never be a moment of hesitation, and the actual reader may entirely miss the fantasy (4).

According to Todorove, the fantastic is built upon the ambiguity of genres (5). In other words, what his analyses suggest is that the fantastic is not a genre at all, but rather it lies in the impossibility of identifying certain stories in terms of generic reality to which they refer.

Join now!

“In a world which is indeed our world, the one we know, a world without devils, sylphides, or vampires, there occurs an event which cannot be explained by the laws of this same familiar world. The fantastic is that hesitation experienced by a person who knows only the laws of nature confronting an apparently supernatural phenomenon.” (qtd. in Aichele 5, qtd. in Horri 67)

As far as Todorov’s ideas are concerned, this ambiguous genre is located between two other distinct genres: Uncanny and Marvelous. The Uncanny presents the bizarre events happening in the everyday world. Although they seems ...

This is a preview of the whole essay