• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Heat of Neutralization in a Calorimeter with Weak and Strong Electrolytes

Free essay example:

Heat of Neutralization in a Calorimeter with Weak and Strong Electrolytes


Lab Performed: November 11th, 2008

Section 006

T.A:  Teresa


The purpose of this experiment is to find the concentration of the unknown HCl as a strong electrolyte to observe the enthalpy changes between strong and weak electrolytes. This is conducted by using a “coffee-cup” calorimeter and a series of solutions: HCl, HNO3, NaOH (all strong electrolytes) and Phenol (weak electrolyte).

Both strong electrolytes and weak electrolytes are used in this lab. The difference between strong electrolytes and weak electrolytes is that strong electrolytes completely ionize in aqueous solution making the solution a good conductor. In contrast, weak electrolytes do not behave the same way and will only partially ionize, but is only a fairly good conductor of electricity (Petrucci et al, 2007).  The examples of strong electrolytes in this experiment are HCl, HNO3 and NaOH. The phenol solution that it is use is a weak electrolyte.

The reaction is happening within a “coffee-cup” or Styrofoam cup calorimeter where the neutralization reaction between the NaOH and the acid will act as the system. The heat that is absorbed or released by the system during the reaction within the calorimeter, is called the heat of the reaction, q. The formula for q is: q = mcΔt

The heat of the system is comes from the combination of hydrogen ions and hydroxide ions to make water. When the H+ (hydrogen ions) and OH- (hydroxide ions) ions come from two strong electrolytes, they will have no effect on the heat of neutralization, but it is found that reactions with strong electrolytes produce the same amount of heat (-55.90KJ/mol). Likewise, within a reaction with a weak electrolyte, such as phenol, the nature of the solution will determine the heat of the reaction – either smaller or larger than -55.90KJ/mol of H+ (Strathopulous, 2008).

Materials and Methods

The experimental procedure used for this experiment was outlined in the CHEM 120L lab manual, Experiment 4. All steps were followed without deviation.


Table 1: Observation of Acids and Bases


Concentration of Solution Used

 Acid            Base

ΔT from graph


Moles of H2O Formed (nwater)

Number of kJ/mole of H2O formed


















































Since the number of KJ/mol of water formed will be the same as the KJ/mol as the electrolyte. Seeing as these acids or electrolytes should all be strong, except for phenol, these values are fairly accurate. This is known because the correct because the amount of heat that is given off, theoretically by strong electrolytes is 55.90KJ/mol. The values that were found are all technically negative values because the process is exothermic, meaning that the heat moves from the system, neutralization, to the surroundings.

 The calculations show that the neutralization reaction with NaOH and HNO3 produces an average molar enthalpy of 54 kJ/mol. Both HNO3 and NaOH are strong electrolytes and therefore both completely ionize in water. Of the four parts conducted in this experiment, this was the closest value to the number of kilojoules per mole of water formed.

To solve for the molarity of the unknown hydrochloric acid, the average of the heat of reactions from both trials of part A were used. By finding the moles of water (which is equal to the amount of moles of HCl) the molar enthalpy was determined using q = mcΔt. By taking the average molar enthalpy, -53KJ/mol, the moles of the unknown HCl can be determined. The average morality of HCl unknown #5 that was found was 2.24M. The calculations are shown in the results section as part D.

With an average molar enthalpy of 54 kJ/mol, the neutralization reaction between HNO3 and NaOH produced the most heat per mole of H2O formed. This reemphasizes on the point that strong electrolytes dissociate completely as well as releases more heat for the reaction. If compared to part c, neutralization reaction between phenol and sodium hydroxide (a weak electrolyte), it is apparent that the reaction with the strong electrolytes produces more heat; average heat of reaction for part C equalled 40 kJ/mol versus the heat of reaction for part B which was 54 kJ/mol. The solutions in part C do not completely ionize which is a result of the lower molar enthalpy. These results should have shown more of a difference in heat, however there are many sources of error so these results are slightly off.


In this experiment, the strong acids that were used were HCl and HNO3 – strong electrolytes. The weak acid that was used was called phenol – weak electrolytes. The base that was used for all 4 neutralization reactions was a strong base called sodium hydroxide which also happens to be a strong electrolyte.

        Because there were so many trials and required readings, there was plenty of room for error in this lab. Some sources of error include reading errors such as reading the thermometer incorrectly and not keeping the readings constant (i.e. every 10 seconds, every 5 seconds), keeping time inconsistently. When placing the thermometer in the calorimeter, it was suggested not to allow the thermometer to touch the bottom of the coffee cup; a few times, because this was so tedious, the thermometer did touch the bottom and that may have affected the results as well. Stirring the solution aids the reaction, but some parts of the experiment may have been stirred more rapidly than others which may have affected the results. Finally, at the beginning of each trial it was recommended to take a reading of the temperature every second, however it was difficult to do this and the temperatures may be off. This lab displayed the functions of the calorimeter accurately due to the fact that the calorimeters are not perfect and do let some heat escape.


Department of Chemistry 2008 First Year Chemistry Chem 120L Laboratory Manual. University

of Waterloo, Waterloo. pp 16-20.

Petrucci, Ralph et.al. General Chemistry Principles & Modern Applications, Ninth Edition.

        Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2007.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Chemistry section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related University Degree Physical Sciences Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related University Degree Chemistry essays

  1. A 0.60 um film of silicon dioxide is to be etched with a buffered ...

    Therefore, the final dimensions of the window, as measured at bottom of the film, after ideal isotropic etching using a wet etchant is complete is represented in the following diagram: This question is slightly ambiguous. Therefore, I have solved the question through two different techniques.

  2. Experimental applications of Hesss Law

    Besides, when the solid ammonium chloride was added to the water in the Dewar flask the temperature of the solution decreased.

  1. Synthesis of Aspirin by Green Chemistry Methods

    This is caused by the lack of nucleation sites [4] [5]. A liquid requires a nucleation site such as a bubble in order to boil. When the hot spots do manage to find such a site, either on the

  2. The determination of the molar enthalpy of the combustion of magnesium using Hesss Law

    The enthalpy change of a reaction can be tested found through the process of using an calorimeter. A calorimeter is a closed system in which matter cannot move throughout the system. Calorimetry can be defined as a process in which the changes of energy are measured within a chemical system.

  1. The objective of this experiment is to determine how a buffer system resists large ...

    The pH of solution of buffer containing acetic acid and sodium acetate is calculated as by first identifying the acid-base properties of the various species in solution, and then consider the possible proton transfer reaction these species can undergo. Since acetic acid is largely undissociated in aqueous solution and since

  2. Forensic Chemistry - Ion Selective Electrode. The objective of experiment is to determine ...

    The ‘pH glass-electrode’ or hydrogen selective electrode is the most responsive of all ISE's, yet measurements of pH to better than ±0.01 pH are known to require considerable care: this corresponds to an uncertainty of ±2%. However, accuracy of 2% or even down to 0.5% can be achieved if the operator follows good laboratory procedures.

  1. The aims of this experiment are to measure the heat of decomposition of hydrogen ...

    Such reactions are said to be exothermic (exo means ?out?, so heat flows out). The amount of heat transferred during a reaction can be measure with a device called calorimeter. At its simplest, a calorimeter is just an insulated vessel with a stirrer, a thermometer, and a loose-fitting lid to keep the contents at atmospheric pressure.

  2. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Measurement of Density and Determination of Partial Molar Volume, and the Effects ...

    moles/cm², R is gas constant and T is constant or particularly as the room temperature. The method used in the experiment is static method wherein the use of equipment called Du Nouy Tensiometer was shown, which consists of a platinum-iridium ring supported by a stirrup attached to the beam of a torsion balance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work