• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'All political parties are prey to the iron law of oligarchy.' Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'All political parties are prey to the iron law of oligarchy.' Discuss The 'iron law of oligarchy' was a phrase first used by the German sociologist Roberto Michels in his book Political Parties, published in 1916. From historic insight and studies of both the German SPD and the Italian Socialist parties, Michels concluded that all parties, whatever their initial intensions, would be controlled by a political elite or oligarchy, who separated themselves, by the control of the bureaucracy, from the masses of their own party ranks. The reasons for this tendency towards oligarchy were the natural necessity for society to have a ruling class, the self fuelling desire for party officials to gain and retain power, and the effectiveness that centralised parties had in a political environment. Since 1916 Michels' work has gained a huge amount of support, particularly as the pressures of parties to centralise power is becoming more important in an increasingly competitive political world, but it is not without its critics. Opponents claim that Michels and his followers paint too black and white a picture and while there does seem to be a strong tendency for oligarchy to form, it can not be said to be an 'iron rule', as there are a number of examples where political parties have not taken on such a form. ...read more.

Middle

Thus for a firm / party to succeed there must be those that are willing to relinquish authority to others and others who are willing to accept it.7 Once these political organisation gain power the system become self perpetuating, due to two main factors; firstly the parties' political aims change with the preservation of the power becoming the primal goal above all others. This is what Michels described as the 'substitution of ends'- the official ends are abandoned and the organisation's survival becomes the real ends.8 Secondly the recently elevated party officials change as they leave the ranks of the masses and enter the political elite taking on board their issues, interests and values - they undergo their own 'substitution of ends'. This class movement is particularly significant in socialist parties where members will often come from the working classes and thus political power represents a new social base9 and often large financial incentives.10 This can lead to arrogance, with party member looking down upon the rank and file members11 and being convinced that their influence is essential for the party's survival and thus the search of further power is morally sound as it is in the party's interests.12 This is not entirely untrue, as Duverger stated 'The masses are naturally conservative; they become attached to their old leaders, they are suspicious of new faces'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Part of the problem is that Michels limited himself to the analysis of large / mass, capitalist parties, with national or regional aspirations. For many this is too narrower a plane to be able to make an empirical judgement about political parties as a whole, as virtually any social group can define itself as having political interests. It is also possible to point to a number of examples of parties which retain a certain aspect of democratisation, within their party ranks. Supporters of the 'iron rule' theory would counter this argument by claiming that these parties were not an exception to the rule, but just at the early stages, not having been given time to develop from its genetic phase. Like many sociological debates, it is not an argument that is close to being solved as the extent of debate far outweighs concrete evidence for either side.22 But as politics penetrates further into the people's everyday lives, politics is likely to be further polarised23 and political organisations of all kinds will have to become more centralised to compete on a level playing field with each other, giving increasing weight to the 'iron rule of oligarchy'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

5/5

This is an excellent essay. It has a clear structure, detailed critical engagement with the literature, and a strong level of analysis. Conclusions are spelt out well and within a cohesive context. The range of reading is good and clearly thorough. I would have liked to see a bit more consideration of party competition as a factor, and some modern examples to this effect. This aside, this is a very adept answer to a difficult question.

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 26/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. How effective is international law?

    Private International Law is largely 'invisible' to the public, but is the focus for all. Private International Law is very effective, as it is uncontroversial and invisible. But it underpins everyday travel, trade and communications between states. Hence aiding globalisation.

  2. Are states still the most powerful actors in global politics?

    ANALYSIS (5-6 pages) Before I argue that states continue to be the main actors in global politics, it must be understood what exactly is assumed to be important in international relations. War, peace, and the resolution of inter-state conflicts are among the most important things to examine when studying states as actors13 (first argument)

  1. World would be a better place if more politicians were female. Do you agree?

    finance minister, and by 2005, Transparency International termed Nigeria as one of 21 most improved states.

  2. The importance of non-state actors in the World politics.

    Some of these agencies, such as United Nations, have very wide range of functions and some, like African Postal Union, have very narrow. They have significant and continuing impact on interstate relations. Their power has grown so much that they can affect the foreign policy of the member states.

  1. Compare the role of interest and pressure groups in the UK, France and Russia.

    This has led to a large, but organised and formal array of interest and pressure groups within the country. In contrast, the French system of interest groups has traditionally mistrusted interest groups. The development of interest group activity was hampered by the elite conception of the proper role of the state.

  2. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power.

    In the same attack of irrationality, he attributes the success of Anwar Sadat in achieving effective Arab cooperation between 1971 and 1975 to other inadequacies. Methodology Walt organises his article into three main sections, each outlining one of his key concepts.

  1. Is Media the fourth branch of power? Discuss.

    The idea of the expression is to highlight how powerful media is, but it does not have any statutory or constitutional rights to be called a fourth branch of power in none of the countries. In this section it is possible to view four different examples of a link between

  2. What is globalisation and is it a new phenomenon?

    However, according to an article that was published in the ?Economist? in July 20th 2009, globalisation is the more or less simultaneous marketing and sale of identical goods and services around the world. So widespread has the phenomenon become over the past two decades that no one is surprised any

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work