- Join over 1.2 million students every month
- Accelerate your learning by 29%
- Unlimited access for just £4.99 per month
'All political parties are prey to the iron law of oligarchy.' Discuss
- Essay length: 1936 words
- Submitted: 19/06/2006
-
Marked by teacher:
Grace Thomas
Teacher essay summary
5/5
This is an excellent essay. It has a clear structure, detailed critical engagement with the literature, and a strong level of analysis. Conclusions are spelt out well and within a cohesive context. The range of reading is good and clearly thorough. I would have liked to see a bit more consideration of party competition as a factor, and some modern examples to this effect. This aside, this is a very adept answer to a difficult question.
Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 26/03/2012
The first 200 words of this essay...
'All political parties are prey to the iron law of oligarchy.' Discuss
The 'iron law of oligarchy' was a phrase first used by the German sociologist Roberto Michels in his book Political Parties, published in 1916. From historic insight and studies of both the German SPD and the Italian Socialist parties, Michels concluded that all parties, whatever their initial intensions, would be controlled by a political elite or oligarchy, who separated themselves, by the control of the bureaucracy, from the masses of their own party ranks. The reasons for this tendency towards oligarchy were the natural necessity for society to have a ruling class, the self fuelling desire for party officials to gain and retain power, and the effectiveness that centralised parties had in a political environment. Since 1916 Michels' work has gained a huge amount of support, particularly as the pressures of parties to centralise power is becoming more important in an increasingly competitive political world, but it is not without its critics. Opponents claim that Michels and his followers paint too black and white a picture and while there does seem to be a strong tendency for oligarchy to form, it can not be said to be
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- Over 150,000 essays available
- Just £4.99 a month
Not the one? We have 100's more
International Politics (view all)
- What is the Significance of the Disagreement between Neo-Rea...
- Compare and contrast the ways in which realist and liberal m...
- In this essay I plan to analyze the multi dimensional charac...
- Kant's theory of international relations.
- The Role of Non-State Actors in International Diplomacy.
- Syria's Development Towards Democracy
- To what degree does the level of industrialisation experienc...
- The Effect of Nationalist Ideology on Violence in Yugoslavia...
- What are the main causes of Voter Apathy in the USA?
- Discuss the role of international organizations in internati...
- Why is the Common Agricultural Policy so difficult to reform...
- 'A gets B to do something that he or she would not otherwise...
- Why is the single currency so important? Discuss with relati...
- What evidence is there that the state is still the dominant ...
- Explain the economic and political deficiencies of the C A P
MbT essay summary
5/5
This is an excellent essay. It has a clear structure, detailed critical engagement with the literature, and a strong level of analysis. Conclusions are spelt out well and within a cohesive context. The range of reading is good and clearly thorough. I would have liked to see a bit more consideration of party competition as a factor, and some modern examples to this effect. This aside, this is a very adept answer to a difficult question.
