• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

- Assess the extent to which sociological theories of interpersonal violence adequately explain why men are more violent than women.

Extracts from this document...


Essay 2. - Assess the extent to which sociological theories of interpersonal violence adequately explain why men are more violent than women. Violence can mean many different things to different people. The term violence can be used precisely or vaguely and can take many different forms including physical, sexual, verbal, psychological, emotional, social, spatial and financial abuse. This makes it very difficult to find a definition of violence that works for all situations and at all times. Therefore "violence, what is meant by violence, and whether there is a notion of violence at all, are historically, socially and culturally constructed" (Hearn 1998: 15). What is named as violent in one situation may not be named as violent in another; therefore violence is both historically and culturally specific. There are many different theories as to why men are more violent than women. These theories include biological theories, which focus on hormonal patterns and aggression; psychological theories, which focus on personality types and disorders; psychoanalysis, which looks at "projection and displacement" and sociological theories, which focus on "concepts grounded in interpersonal, collective, institutional, structural or societal processes" (Hearn 1998: 17). Biological theories propose that women are naturally less violent than men. Maccoby and Jacklin (1975) describe how women display aggression and interpersonal responses which are different to that of men, which mean that situations are usually resolved without incurring violent behaviour. Biological theories of how violence 'naturally occurs' rely on explanations of differences between male and female chromosomes, hormones, genetics and territoriality. During research in the 1960s biologists found a number of genetic abnormalities in the cells of humans. As Ainsworth (2000) describes, one of these abnormalities was a condition which was labelled XYY. The name came from the discovery that a small proportion of males had an extra Y chromosome (males normally have one X and one Y chromosome, hence XY). This meant that the men with XYY had double male chromosomes, an abnormality which became nicknamed the 'supermale syndrome'. ...read more.


Hotaling and Sugarman (1986) suggest that men who are violent to their wives were traumatized as children, either through being abused themselves or through witnessing abuse of their mother by their father, again focusing on the intergenerational production of violence. Bandura (1973; 1977), a major proponent of Social Learning Theory, combined aspects of behaviourism and cognitive psychology. He argued that people learn their behaviours not only through the idea of rewards and punishments achieved through certain types of behaviour but also through observing other people's actions. By doing this "individuals can learn to anticipate the effectiveness of particular courses of action in achieving desired goals" (Jones 2000: 51; Hoffman at al 1994). To reinforce his theory Bandura conducted an experiment involving a 'Bobo doll' (Bandura 1973; 1977). In this experiment, he had some children witness an adult aggressively attacking a plastic clown called the 'Bobo doll'. The children watched a video where a 'model' aggressively beat up a doll. In order to frustrate the children, after the video they were placed in a room with attractive toys, but they could not touch them. Then the children who had watched the video and some other children who had not witnessed the violence, were led to another room where there were identical toys to those used in the Bobo video. Bandura found that the children exposed to the aggressive model were more likely to act in physically aggressive ways than those who were not exposed to the aggressive model (Ainsworth 2000; Bandura 1973; Bandura 1977; Hoffman et al 1994; Jones 2000). However there are also many criticisms of these theories as the exact process of how social learning or socialization takes place is often unclear and often represent a very simple explanation of how violence happens and is reproduced. Hearn (1998: 27) also claims that there is an "under theorization of gender" amongst the socially located theories. ...read more.


Although it is important to remember that all men are not violent all the time and it is not only men who are violent, it still remains obvious that it is men who dominate and specialize in violence. As Hearn (1998) concludes "Men remain experts in how to do violence and in the doing of violence" (Hearn 1998: 36). Violence will always be a very powerful way of showing one's masculinity. In conclusion, there are clear differences between men and women with regard to violent behaviour, however the theories behind these differences are much more complex than I originally thought. While social learning models account for some of these differences, it is unhelpful to identify one specific factor or theory which can account for violent behaviour (Hoffman et al 1994). Each theory has it strengths and weaknesses. For example, while the Social learning theory is very useful in that it highlights the important ways in which environmental influences can be translated into violent behaviour, it depends solely on the "application of a few basic principles to the complex variety of human behaviour" (Nietzel 1979 cited in Jones 2000: 66). Basically the theory relies on experiments which require participants to do specific tasks which are unlikely to be repeated anywhere outside the laboratory, in everyday life, where violence occurs. No single theory can provide all the answers, however when some of these theories are combined to provide a multi-causal explanation, it gives a much clearer picture of why men are more violent than women. These factors can include; violence in society as a whole; family socialisation; cultural norms and values; growing up in a patriarchal society; the personal attitudes of the individual; the use of substances and the effects of subcultures, and these factors may all combine to a point where violent behaviour is much more likely to occur (Ainsworth 2000). As long as we recognise the multi-causal nature of violent behaviour, sociological theories can offer us a number of valuable insights as to why men are more violent than women. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Gender Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Gender Studies essays

  1. Examine the sex-gender debate in feminist philosophy and social science.

    Distinguishing sex and gender, however, also enables the two to come apart: they are separable in that one can be sexed male and yet be gendered a woman, or vice versa (Haslanger 2000b; Stoljar 1995). So, this group of feminist arguments against biological determinism suggested that gender differences result from cultural practices and social expectations.

  2. Masculinity in Crisis

    society, particularly young men and the youth subcultures in which they relate to, which in essence forms a basis for their socialisation, from young boys to their transition to young adult males. This essay will also aim to highlight historical aspects of men and masculinity showing that men have continuously

  1. Gender Issues in Car Advertisements: How are 'Masculinity' and 'Femininity' Represented in Car Advertisements? ...

    Nevertheless, men also feel the need to be comparable to those featured in the advertisements. They strive to appear successful, financially stable, adventurous and heroic. However, whereas in the past the automobile industry has been extremely male dominated, in her article in Advertising Age Alice Z.

  2. Gender or sexual violence, can it be stopped or how can it be prevented?

    A Few Facts about Sexual and Gender-Based Violence -- World-wide, an estimated 40 to 70 per cent of homicides of women are committed by intimate partners, often in the context of an abusive relationship. -- Around the world, at least one in every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime.

  1. Summers states that The actual experience of far too many women in Australia today ...

    The relationship between patriarchy and capitalists is further examined in the increase in the rate of caesarian sections in private hospitals, which was 29.5% in 1999. This was 53% higher than the rate of 19% for woman in public hospitals (Greig, Lewins, White 2003: p.p 59-77).

  2. The life and works of Sigmund Freud.

    From an early age, Freud was critical of the feminist argument for equality between the sexes. He thought that it was "absurd" to think that a married woman could earn as much money as her husband, because her domestic responsibilities should take up all of her time and energy.

  1. 'Patriarchy explains the widespread nature of violence against women'. Discuss with reference to particular ...

    Most often the case being that the abuser is a member of her own family. Two of the most common forms of violence against women are abuse by intimating male partners and coerced sex.

  2. Social Anthropology - To what extent are society and culture reproduced across the ...

    Men grow beards but not moustaches when they get married. Women wear their hair in a bun on the back of their head. The fascinating aspect of the Amish culture is the period when the Amish children enter the age of 16.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work