• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilisations, can archaeology help account for these differences?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kris Breadner Compare and Contrast Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilisations, can archaeology help account for these differences? The legends and myths of both the Egyptian and, to a lesser extent, Mayan civilisations have always been a point of fascination for the peoples of the developed world. It is perhaps a testament to our own cultural arrogance that we grapple to comprehend the technological and cultural achievements of these great civilisations. However, it would be all too easy to group all of these wonderful and inactivating cultures together, and look only to the similarities which they share. This would be to ignore the fact that these cultures were, geographically, nearly antipodean, and also that these cultures reached perhaps their 'golden eras' roughly 3,000 years apart from each other. This is what makes a comparative study of the two cultures so interesting, as undoubtedly they both shared similarities, which seem particular to only a handful of societies, yet they did this in different corners of both the earth and time. It is important, in order to carry out a comparative analysis of these great races, to obtain a feeling of perspective over the periods and areas with which we are dealing. To begin with, it is important to point out that when looking at Mayan civilisation, we are dealing with what is considered the most historically interesting and culturally important, that is the period between 300 and 900 A.D. This period, known as the 'Classic Period' is the most interesting to historians and archaeologists as it was at the point where technological development and cultural progression was at its zenith. ...read more.

Middle

The idea that Mayan agriculture was of a simple slash and burn nature is indeed a direct fault of archaeologist's reluctance to let go of certain theses and theories. This idea of the primitive nature of Mayan agriculture is part of the Swidden theory; something which many who studied in the field clung to despite overwhelming evidence to suggest that Mayan agriculture was far more developed than the theory allowed for. In fact a study of the Mayan lowlands shows use of raised fields or bajos, whose use in other developed parts of Mesoamerica has been widely emphasised, whereas their existence in the Maya territories has been ignored. There is also evidence for the use of terraced farming in the region, and also complex irrigation networks, which was almost certainly omitted from archaeological reports, as they did not fit in with the widely accepted Swidden theory. It would seem that the conservative nature of a few archaeological studies is accountable for many of the differences that we see between the great ancient civilisations. It is however, necessary that the study of archaeology should be carried out in this particularly conservative fashion, for if we were to accept all theories as possibly correct then it would be almost impossible to carry out historical analysis of archaeological theses. It is for this reason that some of the apparent differences between Mayan and Egyptian cultures appear, the advancement of agriculture is just one of those domains. Yet this is not entirely surprising considering the conditions in which studies must be carried out, for the rainforests of Guatemala are considerably harder to study than the land of the Nile Valley. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, in Mayan civilisation there was no room for social movement; whereas it was reasonably common for men of lowly birth to rise in the Egyptian social structure. Although it is also true that the Egyptians differed greatly from the Mayans in their organisation, having made almost a modern capital from Memphis, in which a bureaucracy operated outside of the Pharaoh's appointment. The Mayans used a much more traditional system of feudalism that operated on a less bureaucratic level. Archaeologists have tried to account for this development in Egyptian culture by the claim that they were visited by what were known as 'newcomers' around 3,400 B.C who brought new enlightened ideas which were incorporated into Egyptian thinking. This arrival is depicted on the ivory sword handle of Gebel el-Arak, which shows the arrival of a race similar to the Mesopotamians. It is inevitable that between to cultures in such differing parts of the world, there will exist certain differences and similarities. To look at the two cultures, it would appear that the Egyptians, by western standards were further developed than the Mayans who still practised sacrifices and blood letting even at the end of their period. Yet archaeologists have little difficulty in explaining the reasons for these differences, as there is no reason why the two cultures should emerge in a way that resembles the other. I believe that what causes the most controversy and the most interesting argument is the existence of deep similarities between these ancient and extinct peoples. It is more the archaeologists task to present an account for these similarities than it is to ponder on the differences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Anthropology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Anthropology essays

  1. This Research paper will present an overview of traditional Chinese marriage system and customs ...

    Status: by the time of the Zhou Dynasty (1027 - 221B.C.) marriages were conducted according to social ranks, especially among the reigning classes. For example, a minister in a powerful country could make a marriage alliance with a noble in a weak country, while a prince in a weak country

  2. Colonialism, Nationalism and Islamism: Discourse on Women in Egypt.

    Increased British presence within society in the early half of the twentieth century and the growing class distinction as a result of the colonial economic and political problems lead to stronger nationalist feelings among Egyptians. Social change had begun to take place as well as political.

  1. How far had the 'New Soviet Man' emerged in the USSR by the end ...

    been no attempts to change the thinking of men so many were still chauvinistic and unsympathetic to the governments aim to create proletarian unity, and under the current situation women especially would not be firm supporters of the state by choice because their situation had not improved, and in cases it was worse than it had been in early 1917.

  2. The people known to us as the Celts, first appeared in Greek texts, around ...

    Speaking the same language is not an indicator of a united group of people. The language may simply have spread and been adopted in other areas. "Unlike the Romans or Greeks, who were fully conscious of their own Identity and culture, there is no evidence that there was, in the

  1. The realms of magic, religion and science appear to have been entangled if one ...

    He defines religion as a changeable and wavering phenomenon of beliefs in higher powers that man attempts to please. Although magic and science believe in powers higher than man, they, on the other hand, are consistent and used for practical and personal purposes.

  2. The organisation - what makes it 'tick'?

    A way of identifying structures that are common and correct to their environment is to classify them organic or mechanistic. The authors Burns & Stalker gave these labels to organisations at separate ends of a continuum and in most cases companies fall in between these extremes.

  1. For this assignment I will be looking atthe 1638 siege of Baghdad as accounted ...

    Having good leadership also was an important factor. Zarain mentions the names of four squadron leaders and how they were diligent and courageous. Supply and resources was a factor and the Ottomans were usually well provisioned. They were also a very large army. Zarain gives figures for the size of the army: there were 35,000 foot soldiers, which included janissaries, and there were 73,389 lightly armed horsemen.

  2. To what extent can human cooperative and social behaviour be explain by the selfish ...

    Hamilton (1964) supported Dawkins and the genes eye view of evolution; according to Hamilton?s rule (1964) b>c/r whereby ?b? is the benefit to the recipient by the actors behaviour, ?c? is the cost ensued by the actor by the action taken and ?r? is the degree to which the actor

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work