• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilisations, can archaeology help account for these differences?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kris Breadner Compare and Contrast Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilisations, can archaeology help account for these differences? The legends and myths of both the Egyptian and, to a lesser extent, Mayan civilisations have always been a point of fascination for the peoples of the developed world. It is perhaps a testament to our own cultural arrogance that we grapple to comprehend the technological and cultural achievements of these great civilisations. However, it would be all too easy to group all of these wonderful and inactivating cultures together, and look only to the similarities which they share. This would be to ignore the fact that these cultures were, geographically, nearly antipodean, and also that these cultures reached perhaps their 'golden eras' roughly 3,000 years apart from each other. This is what makes a comparative study of the two cultures so interesting, as undoubtedly they both shared similarities, which seem particular to only a handful of societies, yet they did this in different corners of both the earth and time. It is important, in order to carry out a comparative analysis of these great races, to obtain a feeling of perspective over the periods and areas with which we are dealing. To begin with, it is important to point out that when looking at Mayan civilisation, we are dealing with what is considered the most historically interesting and culturally important, that is the period between 300 and 900 A.D. This period, known as the 'Classic Period' is the most interesting to historians and archaeologists as it was at the point where technological development and cultural progression was at its zenith. ...read more.

Middle

The idea that Mayan agriculture was of a simple slash and burn nature is indeed a direct fault of archaeologist's reluctance to let go of certain theses and theories. This idea of the primitive nature of Mayan agriculture is part of the Swidden theory; something which many who studied in the field clung to despite overwhelming evidence to suggest that Mayan agriculture was far more developed than the theory allowed for. In fact a study of the Mayan lowlands shows use of raised fields or bajos, whose use in other developed parts of Mesoamerica has been widely emphasised, whereas their existence in the Maya territories has been ignored. There is also evidence for the use of terraced farming in the region, and also complex irrigation networks, which was almost certainly omitted from archaeological reports, as they did not fit in with the widely accepted Swidden theory. It would seem that the conservative nature of a few archaeological studies is accountable for many of the differences that we see between the great ancient civilisations. It is however, necessary that the study of archaeology should be carried out in this particularly conservative fashion, for if we were to accept all theories as possibly correct then it would be almost impossible to carry out historical analysis of archaeological theses. It is for this reason that some of the apparent differences between Mayan and Egyptian cultures appear, the advancement of agriculture is just one of those domains. Yet this is not entirely surprising considering the conditions in which studies must be carried out, for the rainforests of Guatemala are considerably harder to study than the land of the Nile Valley. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, in Mayan civilisation there was no room for social movement; whereas it was reasonably common for men of lowly birth to rise in the Egyptian social structure. Although it is also true that the Egyptians differed greatly from the Mayans in their organisation, having made almost a modern capital from Memphis, in which a bureaucracy operated outside of the Pharaoh's appointment. The Mayans used a much more traditional system of feudalism that operated on a less bureaucratic level. Archaeologists have tried to account for this development in Egyptian culture by the claim that they were visited by what were known as 'newcomers' around 3,400 B.C who brought new enlightened ideas which were incorporated into Egyptian thinking. This arrival is depicted on the ivory sword handle of Gebel el-Arak, which shows the arrival of a race similar to the Mesopotamians. It is inevitable that between to cultures in such differing parts of the world, there will exist certain differences and similarities. To look at the two cultures, it would appear that the Egyptians, by western standards were further developed than the Mayans who still practised sacrifices and blood letting even at the end of their period. Yet archaeologists have little difficulty in explaining the reasons for these differences, as there is no reason why the two cultures should emerge in a way that resembles the other. I believe that what causes the most controversy and the most interesting argument is the existence of deep similarities between these ancient and extinct peoples. It is more the archaeologists task to present an account for these similarities than it is to ponder on the differences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Anthropology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Anthropology essays

  1. A brief look into the changes in China from the late Qing period to ...

    Moreover he had to contend with the Nationalist down south and the Japanese in Manchuria and Korea. This period of polycentrism created anarchy and chaos. However, foreign governments recognized China as a state and extend diplomatic relationship to Yuan's government.

  2. First They Killed My Father - account of the Khmer Rouge 'killing fields' in ...

    There is a parallel in that as the people are forced in herds, they are also forced into themselves. Loung discovers loneliness for the first time. She presents herself as a loud, difficult, attention seeking girl with few cares. Loung allows us to witness how her values change from the

  1. This Research paper will present an overview of traditional Chinese marriage system and customs ...

    creation alliances between families -; too important a duty to be left in the rash hands of the young."3 This quote shows how important a marriage was regarded. The three basic elements of an arranged marriage in ancient China were the parental sanction, the Matchmaking and the betrothal gifts.

  2. Are theories of postmodernism Eurocentric?

    started wearing sportswear such as Adidas, Nike and Puma which were not the fashion labels they are today as they were generally used by athletes and were companies owned by white westerners. Hip Hop took these labels and made them into a fashion changing the meaning from sportswear to edgy street wear.

  1. To What Extent are Cultural Differences a Hindrance to Effective Communication? How Can They ...

    serves as a vehicle in which information is continually exchanged between the sender and receiver. For example, TCP/IP, the 'language spoken' by computers communicating across the Internet, works by the recipient continually acknowledging the information it receives in a dialogical stream.

  2. Colonialism, Nationalism and Islamism: Discourse on Women in Egypt.

    Qassim Amin's The Liberation of Women published in 1899 called for a general social and cultural reform within Islamic culture and Egyptian society, particularly focusing on practises pertinent to the treatment of women. Amin, a French-educated upper-class Egyptian called for the education of women (which had been in place in

  1. The people known to us as the Celts, first appeared in Greek texts, around ...

    Speaking the same language is not an indicator of a united group of people. The language may simply have spread and been adopted in other areas. "Unlike the Romans or Greeks, who were fully conscious of their own Identity and culture, there is no evidence that there was, in the

  2. The organisation - what makes it 'tick'?

    A mechanistic organisation is one that encourages rules and procedures that often have a high level of bureaucracy. On analysis they are known for red tape, time wasting, repetition, slow internal communication and expensive to run. However with this are consistency, high accountability and knowing where you fit in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work