• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US The UK and US are essentially both democratic societies in which government is passed by the people, however, they cannot be fully democratic political systems as this would have to be characterised with political equality, which is obviously not the case as both countries have clear leaders possessing the majority of power. The size of both countries prevents everyone from taking part in the government and instead, a representative is chosen to govern on behalf of the people. There is a difference in opinion about how this representative governs; some believe a pluralist approach is taken in which the government is responsive to a plurality of groups which represent a plurality of interests and control diverse political resources. Others are sceptical of this approach and think an elitist approach occurs in which a minority rules over the majority in its own interest. This means they govern in a way, which is rarely responsive to the common public. Some people argue that the UK and US have very different political systems and are therefore governed in different ways. ...read more.

Middle

All organisations, even if they aspire to be democratic, inevitably degenerate into oligarchy (rule by a few). Ruling elite refers to a minority which governs in its own interest and which is not accountable to the majority. It is defined by the possession of three characteristics: consciousness, coherence and conspiracy. Consciousness refers to the awareness of common interests, coherence means that it shares a common interest and conspiracy describes the capacity to act collectively. The UK can be described as being ruling elite due to one small government being in control and where power essentially lies with the Prime Minister. With parliamentary majority, the cabinet can make any decisions they want which was recently demonstrated with issue of the war in Iraq. Many pressure groups opposed and campaigned against Blair's decision to go to war, which in the end had no lasting effect as he made the decision regardless of many peoples opinions. The US can also be considered as an elitist country due the fact that a lot of money goes into US politics compared with the UK. This has resulted in the high campaigning costs, thus limiting who is able to run for election. ...read more.

Conclusion

In order to appeal to ordinary voters, ruling elites must serve the public and cannot imply follow their own interests. Pluralism is very similar in which many views are represented and served. Theories of polyarchy (democratic elitism) accept that most citizens do not take part in politics. Other theories of democratic elitism discuss the fact that there are elites within specific fields, for example in health and military, once again a plurality of elites. In conclusion it can be seen that the UK and US share many characteristics, which can be seen as being both pluralist and elitist. However the US is essentially more pluralist with dispersed points of access with fragmented state power. The government has sub-ordinates and sub-governments, which are very different to the UK where power is more concentrated with one person, the Prime Minister. There are many differences between the two theories; however, some similarities can be seen, linking the two. Dahl argued that most people are not interested in participating much in politics, thus only a small group of individuals is involved who have to compete to win elections by appealing for popular support. Schumpter and Dahl renamed the theory as pluralist elitism, in which politics in countries like the UK and US is polyarchy, rule by many elites (a plurality of elites). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Sovereignty, opinion and revolution in Edmund Burke.

    to acquire a new signi"cance for Edmund Burke and John Millar alike. Hume, for his part, extended Temple's point by maintaining that &Opinion is of two kinds, to wit, opinion of INTEREST, and opinion of RIGHT', with opinion of right*or authority *acting as a perpetual and necessary guarantor to opinion of interest*or the sense of general advantage [39, p.

  2. Compare and Contrast the changing roles and influence of Pressure Groups in the US ...

    The first of the major groups in the US are the 'Economic Groups'. These can be big corporations, or even groups of corporations, called 'peak associations'. Business is very important in America, demonstrated by the increase in involvement in public policy by US firms, since the 1960's.

  1. Media plurality does not necessarily guarantee diversity". Discuss this statement with reference to the ...

    Prior to this there were four dailies but then the Daily News and Daily News on Sunday owned by the Associated Newspapers of Zimbabwe was closed pending results from the courts while the Daily Mirror was closed seemingly due to viability problems.

  2. 'Pluralists and Marxists provide fundamentally different accounts of the distribution of political power'. Discuss.

    political power and they use this to dominate and exploit the rest of society. The Marxist analysis of capitalism argues there are two primary classes: Capitalists, who own the means of production and employ the labour capacity of others and the Proletariat, who have to sell their capacity of work to an employer for a wage.

  1. Analyse the ways in which US pressure groups are more significant then their UK ...

    Having this sort of connection in government will always be a good thing, and this allows pressure groups in the USA to have greater success. 'Iron triangles' also give US pressure groups greater power and significance. These 'alliances' between pressure groups, the relevant congressional committees and the relevant government department or agency.

  2. How can we be free and yet be governed?

    It is clear that Rousseau is talking about a radically different interpretation of freedom than that which he assumes to have existed in the state of nature. He is trying to show, in his own words, that "to be driven by our appetites alone is slavery, while to obey a law that we have imposed on ourselves is freedom".

  1. The Deliberative Agency: Opportunities to Deepen Public Participation.

    In the best circumstances, APA has led to successive rounds of experimentation with "two-way" methods of information sharing and created more bargaining room for "citizens groups" at the table. * The National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"), passed in 1969, instructs agencies to work "in cooperation with State and local governments

  2. Liberals and conservatives, Compare and Contrast.

    Furthermore, liberals believe that tax policy should be used to provide wealth distribution from the rich to the poor. In contrast, conservatives view taxes as a tool to provide for the common good, and "they believe that free market forces can more efficiently run large programs than the government can" (Fiorina 612).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work