• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US The UK and US are essentially both democratic societies in which government is passed by the people, however, they cannot be fully democratic political systems as this would have to be characterised with political equality, which is obviously not the case as both countries have clear leaders possessing the majority of power. The size of both countries prevents everyone from taking part in the government and instead, a representative is chosen to govern on behalf of the people. There is a difference in opinion about how this representative governs; some believe a pluralist approach is taken in which the government is responsive to a plurality of groups which represent a plurality of interests and control diverse political resources. Others are sceptical of this approach and think an elitist approach occurs in which a minority rules over the majority in its own interest. This means they govern in a way, which is rarely responsive to the common public. Some people argue that the UK and US have very different political systems and are therefore governed in different ways. ...read more.


All organisations, even if they aspire to be democratic, inevitably degenerate into oligarchy (rule by a few). Ruling elite refers to a minority which governs in its own interest and which is not accountable to the majority. It is defined by the possession of three characteristics: consciousness, coherence and conspiracy. Consciousness refers to the awareness of common interests, coherence means that it shares a common interest and conspiracy describes the capacity to act collectively. The UK can be described as being ruling elite due to one small government being in control and where power essentially lies with the Prime Minister. With parliamentary majority, the cabinet can make any decisions they want which was recently demonstrated with issue of the war in Iraq. Many pressure groups opposed and campaigned against Blair's decision to go to war, which in the end had no lasting effect as he made the decision regardless of many peoples opinions. The US can also be considered as an elitist country due the fact that a lot of money goes into US politics compared with the UK. This has resulted in the high campaigning costs, thus limiting who is able to run for election. ...read more.


In order to appeal to ordinary voters, ruling elites must serve the public and cannot imply follow their own interests. Pluralism is very similar in which many views are represented and served. Theories of polyarchy (democratic elitism) accept that most citizens do not take part in politics. Other theories of democratic elitism discuss the fact that there are elites within specific fields, for example in health and military, once again a plurality of elites. In conclusion it can be seen that the UK and US share many characteristics, which can be seen as being both pluralist and elitist. However the US is essentially more pluralist with dispersed points of access with fragmented state power. The government has sub-ordinates and sub-governments, which are very different to the UK where power is more concentrated with one person, the Prime Minister. There are many differences between the two theories; however, some similarities can be seen, linking the two. Dahl argued that most people are not interested in participating much in politics, thus only a small group of individuals is involved who have to compete to win elections by appealing for popular support. Schumpter and Dahl renamed the theory as pluralist elitism, in which politics in countries like the UK and US is polyarchy, rule by many elites (a plurality of elites). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the changing roles and influence of Pressure Groups in the US ...

    This is a change from governments at this time, who often used to be pro big-business. Firms rarely became politically involved. However, active involvement especially at local level in now far greater, due in no small part to the quick changes in the economy, and the observed weakness of large American firms to competition from abroad.

  2. Analyse the ways in which US pressure groups are more significant then their UK ...

    Pressure groups can persuade MP's to raise issues and points, but when it comes to voting, party, not pressure groups, loyalties prevail. The House of Lords, on the other hand, are more inclined to be independent, rather than have strong party loyalty.

  1. The Deliberative Agency: Opportunities to Deepen Public Participation.

    Participants are polled at the end of deliberations and the results are compared to calculate opinion change. Results provide decision-makers with a snapshot of how the public would be likely to respond if they had the opportunity to become informed about the issues.

  2. How can we be free and yet be governed?

    Mill attempts to do the same thing, but the balance which he strikes is considerably more biased toward freedom and away from government. He states that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others".

  1. Is Representative Democracy An Effective Way to Distribute Political Power?

    Many of the current arguments over democracy revolve around what we might call demands for political presence: demands for the equal representation of women with men demands for a more even-handed balance between the different ethnic groups that make up each society; demands for the political inclusion of groups that

  2. Compare and Contrast the types of military Government experienced in Egypt, Spain and Brazil ...

    "but appetite grew on what it fed on".4 This caused the Egyptian regime in the eye's of Finer to progress down the spectrum of regimes until it stabilised in the quasi-civilianised sector. The military government of Brazil can be classified as a dual regime.

  1. Sovereignty, opinion and revolution in Edmund Burke.

    and stupid, the origin of a Government from the people with its continuance in their hands' [18]. A multitude, Burke goes on to argue, can scarcely be said to constitute a &people' prior to the establishment of the state: Before society, in a multitude of men, it is obvious, that sovereignty and subjection are ideas which cannot exist.

  2. Does the Media have too much political power in Britain?

    Wring, R. Mortimore, S. Atkinson, 2011, p.296), the Media here were finally given a podium to ruin Brown's political career because they had the political influence to do so. Since the build up of image has created a recent "presidential" style of governing amongst British prime ministers, the full time staff of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work