• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.

Middle

The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    While pluralism can see political parties as trying to serve best the interests of the electorate, progression means political organisations are increasingly becoming elitist, though arguably they always have been. This transcends back to Michels 'iron law of oligarchy' that in every organisation there is an elite.

  2. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    there is considerable conflict among the hierarchies. Social Stratification in Hong Kong When considering which approach is more appropriate to elaborate the social stratification in Hong Kong, we could study some findings done by academics previously in various aspects at first.

  1. Compare and contrast two major theories of the persistence of social inequality (Marx, Weber, ...

    And whilst Marx believed that a proletarian revolution was desirable and inevitable, Weber did not believe this was a possibility that this could happen, nor was it desirable even for an unequal society. Karl Marx claimed that the members of the working class have continued to collectively engage in a

  2. The social class theories of Marx and Weber.

    To Marx, the two main classes in industrialised capitalist societies were the Bourgeoisie or capitalists, and the Proletariat or landless wage workers. The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat by appropriating the surplus value produced by the proletariat. They do this by their ownership of the means of production, and it is

  1. Max Weber. Weber's writing had an influence on structural functionalism, critical theory, some ...

    the individual, developing an understanding of the meaning that individuals attach to various courses of action. Understanding and meaning are key elements of Weber's approach - these are not just intuition or sympathy with the individual, but the product of "systematic and rigorous research" (Ritzer, p.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Contributions of Karl Marx and Max Weber on the Development ...

    He recognized the potential benefits of industrialization, namely that improved technology increases the potential for creativity and diversity of work. The central focus of Marx's work on capitalism was the idea of 'social conflict'. Inequality, was, in Marx's eyes the evil of society and capitalism was only ever going to

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    But the potentials for protest emerge now along different lines of conflict. (These) new conflicts are not ignited by distribution problems but by questions having to do with the grammar of forms of life." (1987:391-2) C. New Social Movements The new movements which correspond to and contest these emerging social conditions have a number of shared characteristics.

  2. Compare and contrast Goffmans and Foucaults explanations of how social order is made and ...

    He believes that social interactions are through how people use their body gestures towards other. Either in a threatening manner or looking at someone to show they mean know harm. Goffman uses an example of a restaurant. Imagine a waiter/waitress in a restaurant performing a role to customers, being happy

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work