• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.

Middle

The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    of interest group politics, as they oppose the typical consensus of opinion of the majority. They are in fact on the fringes because they try to use coercion, or their opinion is not one that can be readily accepted by society.

  2. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    there is considerable conflict among the hierarchies. Social Stratification in Hong Kong When considering which approach is more appropriate to elaborate the social stratification in Hong Kong, we could study some findings done by academics previously in various aspects at first.

  1. Free essay

    Sociological concepts. Enlightenment / social change, Progress / stages of history, Rationalisation / bureaucracy,Organic ...

    This brought about the creation of the merchant class. Capitalism- appears after the bourgeois revolution when the capitalists overthrow the feudal system. In the capitalist controlled parliament laws are made to protect wealth and the wealthy. But Marx's, capitalism like slave society and feudalism, has critical failings inner disagreements which will lead to its downfall.

  2. Modern Political Thought.

    - 'pluses and minuses' will cancel out (SC 2.3). But these solutions will not work, for people may vote on their particular interests even if they are told not to, and they don't need to make explicit factions in order for the majority, following its particular interests, to vote in laws which discriminate against the minority.

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Class struggle is rooted in a clash of opposed needs. NSM theory and Marxism treat this question of needs rather differently, as a brief consideration of Ingelhart's argument reveals. Firstly, for Inglehart, scarcity for the majority is being transcended as society shifts to its postindustrial stage, opening the way for

  2. Compare and Contrast the Contributions of Karl Marx and Max Weber on the Development ...

    He recognized the potential benefits of industrialization, namely that improved technology increases the potential for creativity and diversity of work. The central focus of Marx's work on capitalism was the idea of 'social conflict'. Inequality, was, in Marx's eyes the evil of society and capitalism was only ever going to

  1. A research project into the perceptions of graffiti by certain individuals and groups can ...

    and by analysing the content the researchers believed that such responses enabled them to adequately ascertain the perceptions and responses to graffiti among the participants. Appendix 1- example of questions used in the interviews On classification. Graffiti- is it art?

  2. New Social Movements most effectively describe a specific movement-type emerging in the late 1970s; ...

    This was seen as a reaction against transformations brought about by the process of modernity to which such groups were deemed central. This supposition was negated early on by Gramsci (1971), who claimed that key players in civil society belong either to the hegemonic bloc or are resolutely counter-hegemonic in their consciousness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work