• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.

Middle

The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    There are three main political parties, but in the post war era only the Tories and Labour have been in power at Westminster. In this case 'other' parties such as the British National Party are marginalised. Some groups, which are seen to be radical cannot be incorporated into the system

  2. Free essay

    Sociological concepts. Enlightenment / social change, Progress / stages of history, Rationalisation / bureaucracy,Organic ...

    refers to increasing human mastery over the natural and social environment. In turn, these changes in social structure have changed human character through changing values, philosophies and beliefs. Rationalisation was the master concept of Marx's analysis of modern capitalism, referring to a variety of related processes by which every aspect of human action became subject to calculation, control and measurement.

  1. Modern Political Thought.

    In the end he has to rely on individuals thinking for the whole. Conversely if everyone thinks of himself as a member of the social whole rather than as an isolated individual then the majority decision will express the general will.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    The Green movement makes material demands for a world where beef doesn't rot the brain, where there is clean air for all, where fishing and pollution policies don't destroy the life of the sea, etc. In declaring an expanded range of needs to be political, it challenges the agendas set by established power relations.

  1. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    Secondly, functionalism does not specify how many classes/strata in the social hierarchy, it is only based on the importance of the role, simply speaking, if you can clearly define the importance among a doctor, a lawyer and a teacher in a society, it will exists 3 strata.

  2. New Social Movements most effectively describe a specific movement-type emerging in the late 1970s; ...

    He has sought to build a theory to frame the structural and cultural dimensions of the contemporary western societies where collective action is played out. He has also developed an action-theoretical analysis of the conflictual processes of identity formation in actors.

  1. Biological explanations and social constructionist theories of deviance.

    (Andersen & Taylor, 2007, p.179). Labeling theory points out that there are three stages that occur in the process of labeling, primary, secondary and tertiary. Primary deviance is the actual breaking of the law or norms. Secondary deviance is the behavior that occurs from being labeled deviant, the person accepts the label and continues to act in the way they have been labeled.

  2. Compare and contrast Goffmans and Foucaults explanations of how social order is made and ...

    in the kitchen or staff room, their attitude is completely different and will therefore interact differently with friends and work colleagues by being more themselves and able to relax (Cited in Silva 2009, pg. 317). Whereas, Foucault?s shows that the authority intervenes in social life but depending on the individuals,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work