• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.


The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.


Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    If the BNP were to be successful in influencing government policy on employment law for example, the consequences for ethnic minorities would be extreme. Pluralism fails to recognise other significant actors. In the age of globalization, trans-national corporations cannot be ignored.

  2. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    included wealth and income, educational attainment, political or administrative power, and morality". Such classification obviously agreed to Weber's approach of "status groups"; because these people are sharing similar lifestyle and interests. Furthermore, Lau also suggested "Social classes as structural forces in shaping interpersonal relationship are political actions are relatively insignificant ...."; that are also meet Weber's view.

  1. Free essay

    Sociological concepts. Enlightenment / social change, Progress / stages of history, Rationalisation / bureaucracy,Organic ...

    refers to increasing human mastery over the natural and social environment. In turn, these changes in social structure have changed human character through changing values, philosophies and beliefs. Rationalisation was the master concept of Marx's analysis of modern capitalism, referring to a variety of related processes by which every aspect of human action became subject to calculation, control and measurement.

  2. Modern Political Thought.

    - 'pluses and minuses' will cancel out (SC 2.3). But these solutions will not work, for people may vote on their particular interests even if they are told not to, and they don't need to make explicit factions in order for the majority, following its particular interests, to vote in laws which discriminate against the minority.

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Yet there is no secure basis for limiting labour's needs to wages. Capital has a "totalizing" logic (Carroll and Ratner 1994; Wood 1995) which shapes and invades every sphere of social life. At every point of contact between the opposed circuits of labour and capital, labour finds itself in antagonism

  2. New Social Movements most effectively describe a specific movement-type emerging in the late 1970s; ...

    not yet crystallised into social structures, where action is the immediate carrier of the relational texture of society and its meaning. They are therefore, at least for me, not only a specific sociological object, but a lens through which many problems can be addressed" (Melucci in Avritzer et al, 1997: 95)

  1. I will discuss with you and explain Max Webers view of rationalization and capitalism ...

    His concern was that people would be treated as objects and not as individual human beings, that people would end up working in large factories or companies where their spirits would eventually be crushed (Macionis and Plummer 2005, p.91). I will now discuss with you formal rationality and why I believe it is ultimately oppressive for humanity.

  2. Compare and contrast Goffmans and Foucaults explanations of how social order is made and ...

    and polite and providing good customer service to the customer sitting at the table ordering food and drink. The staff member will use a positive approach and positive body gestures to interact with that customer (some would say acting) they withhold their negative emotions while with the customer, but once

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work