• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.

Middle

The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    of interest group politics, as they oppose the typical consensus of opinion of the majority. They are in fact on the fringes because they try to use coercion, or their opinion is not one that can be readily accepted by society.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    The problem of such working-class people's resistance to felt oppression is not a function of worker animality, lack of awareness or "materialism," but a political problem about collective empowerment. Labour's needs and activities can in no sense be limited to the problems and questions conventionally addressed by trade unionism or official social democratic politics alone.

  1. Are issues of Social Class still relevant in modern society? Explore the issues involved, ...

    a special 'urban programme' of social policies were initiated in 1968, in the way of additional funding, to alleviate some of the disadvantages experienced for pre-school children in considered 'deprived' urban areas. However, further studies revealed these initiatives did little to alleviate their intended purpose.

  2. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    Secondly, functionalism does not specify how many classes/strata in the social hierarchy, it is only based on the importance of the role, simply speaking, if you can clearly define the importance among a doctor, a lawyer and a teacher in a society, it will exists 3 strata.

  1. Max Weber. Weber's writing had an influence on structural functionalism, critical theory, some ...

    By 1871, Count Bismarck had unified Germany and Prussia "attained complete control over most of German-speaking Europe" (Ashley and Orenstein, p. 264). Bismarck was able to balance the interests of the Junkers and the western German industrialists, and was able to push through some progressive reforms, such as social security or pension plans.

  2. New Social Movements most effectively describe a specific movement-type emerging in the late 1970s; ...

    The process of self-understanding embarked upon by the members of this new class - straddling traditional class divides - "ultimately determines one's ability to free oneself of the dominant ideology, overturn the institutional forms of hegemony, create new associational forms, and thereby act in counterhegemonic terms" (Lynch, 1998: 165).

  1. Compare and contrast Goffmans and Foucaults explanations of how social order is made and ...

    . Foucault clearly believes that a lot of this is to do with discourse and that this provides assumptions and that it moulds into everyday practises and relationships. He also believes that different historical events and times are important to making social order as well as changes that can

  2. Compare and contrast Goffmans and Foucaults explanations of how social order is made and ...

    (Staples, et, al., 2009, pg50). In contrast, Foucaultâs work, he suggested that individuals are an object of knowledge, looking into past historic documents of differences in power For in order for Social order to be made and remade; individuals have to be talked and written about to allow opinions and thoughts to be spoken through discourses.(online activity 23)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work