• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the explanations of social change of Karl Marx and Max Weber. Which do you favour and why? Karl Marx (1818- 93) thought social change is what was needed for a better society, and to get social change he believed there must be class conflict. Marx's major concern of social change was economic change. His most well known work dealt with class conflict, the opposition between the capitalists also known, as the bourgeoisie who are the people responsible for controlling the land, factories, etc. and the working class, which are sometimes referred to as the proletariat, are the workers that are being exploited by the bourgeoisie. Marx aspired to build a science of society, but did not describe himself as a sociologist. It was partly for this reason that it was not until the following generation that most of his work began to be recognised. The growth of the European labour movement inspired Marx's work, as did the British materialist tradition. He argued that the existence of private property was what divided people into their social classes and tried to show how and why these classes were inevitably drawn into conflict with each other. ...read more.


The observer must interpret it. All observers, chose particular aspects of reality to give them meaning and significance. Weber believed that these concepts that give meaning to the world come from different cultural values. He suggested that they vary according to social groups and change over time. Because there are no universal values, there can be no universally valid scientific concepts. Therefore reality can only ever be known and understood from value and time relevant points of view. Also in this way, he distinguishes between factual judgements and value judgements. According to Weber, the most important types ideal types of social action. This emphasis on action shows a contrast to Marx's theory. Weber has identified four types of action as the fundamental building blocks for sociology. The first is instrumentally rational action, which is when people adopt a purely technical means for the attainment for their goals. For example a business owner will act in a way, which is most efficient for his or her company to make them earn the most money. The next is value rational action- this is action that is rational is relation to some irrational chosen value. ...read more.


Marx's emphasis of objectively determining laws with the assumption that culture existed merely as a passive reflection of material forces is what Weber specifically opposed. Weber believed that this emphasis diminished the active role of the individual. Weber argued that sociology has to be based on understanding the meanings of people different types of actions as previously discussed rather than trying to analyse human action from external points of view. It is for this reason that I would favour Weber's theory. He focuses more on the each person and their individual actions and points of view, instead of seeing society as combined into groups of different classes. I feel that Weber would gain more valid findings from his research for the same reason. Weber criticised Marx's theory as he felt that social change is always 'open- ended', based as it is on the unpredictability of human action. Marx attempted to predict how people would react in any given context and Weber found this impossible. It would mean that sociology would always lack the predictability of action conditioned by laws and would therefore defy his suggested theory. 1519 words Victoria Basye- J.S.S Part 1 Module- Introduction to Sociology 01/11/03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

    3 star(s)

    While pluralism can see political parties as trying to serve best the interests of the electorate, progression means political organisations are increasingly becoming elitist, though arguably they always have been. This transcends back to Michels 'iron law of oligarchy' that in every organisation there is an elite.

  2. Free essay

    Sociological concepts. Enlightenment / social change, Progress / stages of history, Rationalisation / bureaucracy,Organic ...

    This brought about the creation of the merchant class. Capitalism- appears after the bourgeois revolution when the capitalists overthrow the feudal system. In the capitalist controlled parliament laws are made to protect wealth and the wealthy. But Marx's, capitalism like slave society and feudalism, has critical failings inner disagreements which will lead to its downfall.

  1. Consensus perspective

    The mode of production in material life determined the general character of the social , political and spiritual processes of life' - Marx 3.4 Evaluation of Marxism Advantages: * Marx's views have contributed significantly to the study as sociology as a whole.

  2. Identify the main premises of the interpretative tradition in sociology and the methodological prescriptions ...

    which is that "a cyclist might be engaging in meaningful action- riding her bike along country lanes for pleasure; her collision with another cyclist is not action at all, it is intended by neither; the argument that they have afterwards, however, is meaningful and social."

  1. Compare and contrast functional and Weberian explanations for social stratification. Which of these explanations ...

    more important role will ranked in relative high position in the hierarchy. However, Weber's approach on stratification formation is based on the classification of people into three spheres, i.e. classes - based on economic position; status groups - based on social order; and parties - based on power.

  2. The social class theories of Marx and Weber.

    To Marx, the two main classes in industrialised capitalist societies were the Bourgeoisie or capitalists, and the Proletariat or landless wage workers. The bourgeoisie exploit the proletariat by appropriating the surplus value produced by the proletariat. They do this by their ownership of the means of production, and it is

  1. Educational success is closely related to social class origins. Assess the various explanations that ...

    Noted political scientist Diana Crane states in her research that social class origin is related to educational success and affect's an individual's chances of entering college rather than graduating from it, and also demonstrates the relative importance that social class and intellectual ability have on the attainment of high quality

  2. Are issues of Social Class still relevant in modern society? Explore the issues involved, ...

    Since the Second World War it has been recognised that, in general, middle and upper 'class' children (classification based on their fathers occupation), tend to achieve more than their working 'class' counterparts, both in terms of the length of their education and the level of qualifications they achieve.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work