• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast the pluralist and elitist accounts of political power. Introduction Whilst there are not infinite interpretations of political systems, there are differing accounts of systems theory. Each separate account of a theory can have varying threads such as classical, reformed, neo or radical interpretations. Within these definitions there may be variance over the role of the government or the prominence of power, yet there is confluence on one basic concept. In this essay I shall try to attempt to explain the theories, major ideas and pre-eminent writers in both pluralist and elitist political power. Following on from this I shall attempt to find any similarities and any differences in both pluralism and elitism. In my conclusion I shall attempt to draw on which theory is most relevant in the contemporary political world. Exposition of Pluralism H.S. Kariel is cited in Schwarzmantel's work referring to pluralism as: 'specific institutional arrangements for distributing and sharing governmental power.'1 Therefore pluralism is the dispersion of power to prevent tyranny. If power is concentrated to one group, there will be autocratic rule. By diffusing power, a state will be open to the demands of the population and this is essential to the supposition. This does assume social pluralism; that is a wide variety of interest groups. Social variety, such as difference in class, race, religion, gender and sexuality is needed, but social pluralism does not equate to pluralism. ...read more.

Middle

Similarities Pluralist and elite theory does offer parallels. In Dunleavy and O'Leary's 'Theories of the State', overlaps elite theory and pluralism: 'democratic elitism or revisionist democracy'.7 Polyarchy is perhaps a principal notion of this, in that there are various interest groups in society but these are all in some way or another dominated by an elite at the top of the organisation; as Michels asserted 'Who said organisation, said oligarchy.' Organisations then are led by elites but they have to be receptive to the demands of the interest groups. This does I feel reconcile the two theories of pluralism and elitism, even though they are supposedly opposed. This can be explained by a polyarchy of elites, and it is this numerousness of them that means they must adapt policy to adhere to interest groups. Differences Pluralism believes power is dispersed through society, while in direct contrast elitism finds power concentrated in the hands of a minority. Pluralism centres on the notion of interest groups as being particularly important and significant. This assumes a kind of equal playing field, as not one interest group in pluralist theory is supposed to be more important than the other. However elitism identifies politics as taking place in a sphere 'characterised by structured inequalities.'8 Elites have the domination of resources, such as military, economic or political power in order to impose themselves upon the masses. Elitism identifies the masses as being incompetent. ...read more.

Conclusion

Blair even banned Liz Davies, a member of the Grassroots Alliance faction of the Labour party, from standing for election in 1997 at the Leeds North East seat, as she was seen to be too dissenting. This was however counterattacked by the party members, who then voted Ms. Davies onto the N.E.C. What will replace the House of Lords is also questionable. Will Blair promote the circulation of elites by removing the hereditary peers with simply appointed 'Tony's cronies'? Only time will tell. Certainly, although pluralism is desirable, it is unrealistic. It is perhaps overly pessimistic to say we live in an elitist society, but we do not fulfil the 7 features of a pluralist political model. There are free and fair elections, however this can be disputed in the selection of the Labour party selection for the candidate for London mayor as discussed earlier. There are elected officials, but this is only for selection of MPs & MSPs , MEPs and local council officials. The corridors of power like the civil service, the military and the police remain appointed and to a large degree, unaccountable. However as Schwarzmantel does recognise 'political elites have to submit themselves for re-election but the fact is neglected that many other groups which carry the elite distinction do not.'12 Democratic elitism should merge the best parts of pluralism and elitist theory. However we must realise that with the fusion of two systems, the negative elements will also be exposed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay has some good ideas but is chaotically organised - ironic, given that it is subheaded, usually an indication of a solid structure! Too many words are devoted to summarising texts, without analysing why this is necessary. As such, I'd give it a 2.2, although with some substantial tweaking to the writing style and structure it would probably garner a far better mark.

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 24/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Discuss the scientific nature of sociology.

    The common thread in both lines of thought is the belief that within the study of human societies as with the natural sciences, ultimate truths exist. This however is seen as an erroneous belief by many interpretists, as the achievement of an absolute truth in sociology is impossible.5 Before the

  2. Counselling theory. In this essay I shall analyse the philosophy of the humanistic person ...

    * Rollo May: an American existential psychologist. * Abraham Maslow: an American professor of psychology. * Kurt Goldstein: Were a German Jewish neurologist and psychiatrist who was a pioneer in modern neuropsychology. The person centred model of counselling has its origins within Humanistic psychology and the phenomenological approach (Carl Rogers 1902-1987)

  1. Compare and contrast one process theory of motivation with one content theory

    and love (social), but, there are also needs that are particularly important in a working environment - needs like recognition and promotions (self-esteem needs). At the top of the hierarchy is self-actualization, however only a small proportion of individuals ever manage to achieve this level and it is also very difficult to achieve for younger individuals.

  2. What are the main features of Marshall's theory of citizenship?

    This enrichment would be the gaining of 'rights' by the individuals. The first right is civil citizenship. This includes the fundamental liberal rights such as the right to own property, to enter contracts, and to have the right to access the courts in the event that compensation was required.

  1. Personal Statement

    This allowed children's intellect to develop as well as enabling me to gain experience and knowledge in planning, delivering and evaluating services for young people in line with the Every Child Matters framework and Early Years Foundation Stage guidance. I am always available to work to work evenings and weekends as required.

  2. Is Inequality an Inevitable Feature of Contemporary Society?

    the likelihood of a son with a Class I father are still 3 times greater than chance that the son will also end up in Class I Indeed, Kellner and Wilby, in an article in the Sunday Times in January, 1980 refer to this likelihood as the "1:2:4 Rule of

  1. TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE FUNCTIONALISTS PERSPECTIVE ON SOCIAL STRATIFICATION USEFUL TO THE STUDY ...

    chances of success while the higher strata are placed in grammar schools increasing their chances of success. According to Gordon, very few make it to the very top of the social hierarchy. Davis and Moore had one main critic who criticized everything they said about social stratification and his name was Melvin Tumin.

  2. Body Image Issues through the Sociological Imagination. In this paper I will be exploring ...

    so much impact on the society through the billboard, television and magazine advertisements. The main purpose of this is for health companies to sell their products to help people achieve what they think is beauty. With the media being used more than ever before, especially now with Internet, media corporations

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work