• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Critically debate whether the principle of integrity of professional delivery is more important than the principles of responsivity, risk and criminogenic need?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Critically debate whether the principle of integrity of professional delivery is more important than the principles of responsivity, risk and criminogenic need?" The pessimism of a nothing works epoch caused an increase in political pressure upon the probation service to demonstrate their effectiveness at reducing recidivism of offenders; a practice the service had hitherto been resistant to execute. From research emerged the governmental effective practice initiative, 'what works', demonstrating a reflection of such a political expectation. This discussion will enlarge upon the background to these developments, before moving on to investigate the significant features that form the what works ethos. This will pay particular attention to the four principles of responsivity, risk, criminogenic need and integrity. The contribution of each of the concepts within the National Probation Service, predominantly in relation to accredited programmes and professional practice will be examined. The author will investigate possible clashes between the principles This debate will serve to critically question whether integrity holds a more substantial importance to the paradigm than the others. During the 1970's, evaluation of probation interventions commenced, which led to the now famous rhetoric, attributed to Robert Martinson, that 'nothing works' in producing an appreciative effect on reducing offenders' criminal behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

implicitly states that each PSR shall contain 'an assessment of the offenders likelihood of re-offending... an assessment of the offenders risk of causing serious harm to the public...[and] identify any risks of self harm'. Risk predictions are generated using 'second generation' tools, such as the Home Office Offender Group Reconviction Score (OGRS), providing an actuarial estimate of the proportion of offenders with a particular profile who will be reconvicted, relying on static factors (Chui and Nellis, 2003. p. 167). However, Brown and Stephens (2001) ask 'does it generate reliable predictions?...In practice-it may not'. Third generation assessments have now been developed, such as the Offender Assessment System (OASys). This tool looks at both static and dynamic factors of offending, which enable interventions to be targeted more specifically. However, the tool will not produce a comprehensive assessment itself - assessment of risk of harm and dangerousness is not an exact science (Furniss and Nutley, 2000). It could be stated that this ambiguity in assessment can further damage the argument for risk being more important than integrity. 'Risk' is used to mean both probability of reconviction and danger of harmful violent offences. Confusion can set in if the offender has a high probability of one of these risks and low probability of the other (Raynor and Vanstone, 2002. ...read more.

Conclusion

The same programme delivered badly saw a reconviction rate of 48%. Paradoxically, a matched group that failed to attend the programme reconvicted at a rate of 40%. 'The message is clear, unless a programme is delivered by trained staff according to the manual, it is likely to be ineffective.' (Furniss and Nutley, 2000). This critical debate has focused upon the emergence of the what works era and there can be little doubt that we are seeing the re-emergence of treatment ethos in working with offenders. (Hollin, 1995. p.207). Expectation of evaluation is summarised as an established necessity. In examining each of the four concepts in question, it is possible to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each. Without risk and needs assessment, it would be impossible to discover the correct intervention required for each offender. Responsivity demands that the intervention designed is matched for every offender, to ensure that the learning outcome of the work undertaken is possible and beneficial. Without integrity, programmes would have a lower level of success in reducing criminal behaviour of offenders. On this subject, Chapman and Hough (1998. p.17) exclaim 'what prevents [what works] disintegrating into anarchy and chaos is integrity'. However, the key facts of the what works initiative is the important understanding that each of the principles has an equal part to play, to combine for effective interventions to be implemented successfully. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminology essays

  1. Outline and critically discuss the way in which your studies have developed your understanding ...

    If a child from the Jukes family had been taken at birth to live with the Edwards it is very likely that child would not have become a social deviant. My view now on Eugenics still stands that there are medical benefits as far as disease goes although they can

  2. Outline some of the most important critiques of 'Malestream' criminology.

    Eaton (1985), for one, regards this foundation of criminology as having a part to play in the perpetuation of pathological theories as to female criminality; to quote: "Female criminality has been explained by female biology and female psychology which accounted for the acceptable behaviour of the 'good' woman and the 'unacceptable' behaviour of the bad woman."

  1. Is the British penal system effective? Most of the evidence points to prison not ...

    Additional conditions may also be imposed (known as probation plus) that can require an offender to reside in a hostel or to attend certain treatment programmes. Community Service orders (CSO) were introduced in 1973. These orders were put forward as an alternative to custodial sentences and were supervised by the Probation Service.

  2. Critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of the multi agency public protection arrangements. (MAPPA)

    So how can the effectiveness of MAPPA be measured? Kemshall et al (2005, p. 19) contend that MAPPA must surely be considered effective when an offender who poses a high risk of harm to the community does not go on to reoffend.

  1. Critically examine the suggestion that punishment today is as much about risk management as ...

    education and welfare agencies. However, this modernist agenda came under criticism not least because of the failure of such techniques to reduce re-offending, as Garland (Garland, 1995, p. 193) points out there is wide acknowledgement of fundamental failures within modernist criminal justice to change offender and reduce re-offending.

  2. Sexual Offences and Offending Behaviour. Critically compare and contrast the public notification/disclosure programmes currently ...

    The first public notification laws were passed in Washington state in the 1990s following a number of serious crimes involving sex offenders (Greek, 2010, p. 295) Jones & Newburn (2002, p. 190) note that the major turning point was the sexual assault and murder of seven-year-old Megan Kanka in 1994.

  1. To have an in-depth understanding social justice we need different types of evidence. Discuss.

    different treatment was permitted so long as it maximised the welfare of the worst off? (Newman & Yeates, p:16). By looking at the qualitative evidence in the Surveillance DVD it is evident that welfare policies create opportunities for the government to ?police? people by promoting certain types of behaviour (i.e.

  2. Critically evaluate the current methods employed in the Sex Offender Treatment Programmes (SOTP). Include ...

    The SOTPs are based on the ideas of a form of cognitive-behavioural therapy to reduce the possibility of reoffending. The cognitive aspect involves recognition of the distorted thoughts that the offenders hold, this then allows them to reflect on the illegal sexual acts they have committed and understand the impact they have had on the victim.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work