• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.

Middle

In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Are such matters as questions about culture, identity, self-expression, grass-roots democracy and the like largely irrelevant to them? * Are "New Social Movements" effective in identifying the problems they seek to address, and in pursuing their goals? Or is the very question inappropriate?

  2. The Contribution Sport Makes to Society

    states that sport provides employment for over half a million people in the uk and is worth £12 billion in consumer spending. For example when a country hosts the football world cup, millions of pounds are spent on new state of the art stadiums which will require managers, office staff,

  1. Undertake an analysis of the extent the classical sociological theories of Durkheim, Marx and ...

    it is likely that there will be a more submissive and a more productive workforce, these rules set in the workplace will lead to the effectiveness of procedures. However, there are problems with this viewpoint mostly in the fact that a human's individuality and character will always be different so

  2. Emile Durkheim wanted to show that sociology could be a rigorous scientific discipline that ...

    its structure and the worthiness for study, must have faced derision and ridicule from fellow academics and members of the scientific community alike. It should be noted that Sociology as an academic field of investigation did not even exist whilst Emile was trying to have his theories accepted by his

  1. Social Theory With reference to the original writings of one of the theorists you ...

    In these communities the individual is thought to be connected to another through various channels of attachment to achieve equality. It also aimed to connect individuals so there is no distinction between individual ethics. Durkheim however believed that this principle was to be found in religious beliefs, which helped maintain

  2. Intelligence is impossible to define or measure.

    a single ability, a belief echoed in the test's assessments which are based on verbal and performance tasks. Word count 1,097 Conclusion In concluding I will summarise the main points of both parts of this essay and in so doing, hope to find common ground between these two opposing arguments by attempting to show their interrelated nature.

  1. Contemporary Sociological Theory.

    This form of role-playing involves a single role at a time. The game involves a more complex form of role-playing than that involved in play. In the game, the individual is required to internalize, not only character of a single other, but the roles of all others who are involved in the game with him.

  2. Critically examine the concept of 'community' in relation to virtual community.

    Proximity is identified as one of the key factors as it is argued that one develops strong face-to-face social networks with those who live in the same neighbourhood, the strength of such social networks decays with distance. People sharing the same territory form strong social networks, it is claimed, because they share the same vested interests.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work