• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.

Middle

In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Explain the contribution of one of the theorists covered in the course to the ...

    Here, one may argue Weber's work is currently of interest because, secondly, it establishes a theory and critique of the nature, rise and trajectory of modern culture. 3. Gane maintains that the idea of rationality is a great unifying theme in Marx and others work.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Here we just note them as partly overlapping questions: * Is it legitimate to treat "New Social Movements" as a unitary group of phenomena, sharing characteristics which distinguish them from other social movements? If it is, what places them in a distinct category, apart from their broad contemporaneity?6 * Are

  1. A research project into the perceptions of graffiti by certain individuals and groups can ...

    Both of these interviews focussed on the role of the participants in their local authorities response to graffiti, and what they thought was the best way to tackle the problem, if they believed there was a problem in the first place.

  2. Marx and Durkheim agreed about the nature of the problems of industrial capitalist society ...

    Marx and Durkheim often had conflicting ideas. However, they did share similar views about some sociological ideas. Both believed that scientifically based knowledge of society could be used to improve the conditions of humanity. Both believed their task was to discover the laws that governed the organisation of the social order and draw parallels with the ways

  1. Social Theory With reference to the original writings of one of the theorists you ...

    all aspects of human life while incorporating the significance of the family role and political sphere. This solidarity also focused on the religious nature of common conscience. In doing so it suggested offences that were unorthodox would only be repressed, through the reaffirmation of beliefs incorporated in the individuals' punishment.

  2. What Is The Relevance Of Emile Durkheim For Our Understanding Of The Human World ...

    Giddens (1978) argues that Durkheim pays little attention to the presence of inequalities in this work; he assumes that inequalities are resolved because the relations between groups are morally regulated by either the conscience collective or the state (the brain), however inequalities obviously do still exist despite this.

  1. "Compare and evaluate Durkheim and Tonnies' accounts of social integration in modern societies"

    Tonnies' Gemeinschaft theory suggests that in pre-industrial society, societies were characterised by a strong sense of community and social order. People were generally ascribed to their roles; and as a result of immobility due to lack of transport, intimate and enduring relationships were developed over time.

  2. The Contribution Sport Makes to Society

    Sport England (1999, p7) admits it would be naïve to think sport alone can reduce crime but suggests that strong experiential evidence exists to show that sport definitely has a part to play in preventing crime as it provides challenge, adventure and gives meaning and purpose to a lot of young people's lives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work