• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.

Middle

In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Emile Durkheim wanted to show that sociology could be a rigorous scientific discipline that ...

    colleagues; the closest subject to sociology at the time would have been philosophy. Why then did Durkheim decide to study the somewhat unknown quantity of society? Philosophy, at least as far as Durkheim was concerned, seemed to be too far removed from the issues of the day.

  2. Undertake an analysis of the extent the classical sociological theories of Durkheim, Marx and ...

    it is likely that there will be a more submissive and a more productive workforce, these rules set in the workplace will lead to the effectiveness of procedures. However, there are problems with this viewpoint mostly in the fact that a human's individuality and character will always be different so

  1. Social Theory With reference to the original writings of one of the theorists you ...

    Durkheim work also focused on the social bonds of people and regarded them as ones of compulsion opposed to convention. A secondary criterion of Durkheim's mechanical solidarity was its "ability to mobilise the entire social mass of society due to the immense leverage the common conscience"3 held over ideals.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Here we have the "bureaucratization of labour power" (Habermas) - above all the institutionalization of collective bargaining. We also have the socialization of private ills through the welfare state. In this way, the bureaucratic regulation of the spheres of production and reproduction leads to "class compromise," the "pacification of class conflict."

  1. Sociological Analyses of Suicide

    Unlike Comte, however, Durkheim's contribution to the development of sociological theory and, most importantly, practice, was not only one that served as a classical exposition of the Functionalist / consensus sociological position; it remains a relatively influential force in the theory and practice of sociology to this day.

  2. Identify the main premises of the interpretative tradition in sociology and the methodological prescriptions ...

    It can radically distinguish the two complexes of disciplines in terms of the dissimilarities of subject-matter, and sometimes (as in the work of Rickert) it can also be a distinct character of our interest in the two spheres. It also appeared in the latter view that, "our concern in the

  1. Intelligence is impossible to define or measure.

    Modern tests measure verbal, mathematical, spatial, memory and reasoning ability. The test is pre tested on a population sample, and graded. The average score falls within the range of 90-110. Most of the population score with in this margin, however there are some outlier scores and these represent high or low intelligence.

  2. What Is The Relevance Of Emile Durkheim For Our Understanding Of The Human World ...

    As societies grow the "conscience collective" no longer becomes the most relevant form of social cohesion (although it still exists). The religious organisations which originally circulated doctrines (Giddens 1997) of what is appropriate became less important as differentiations of labour create individual differences, serving as a stimulus for individualism (Kivisto 1998).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work