• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...


Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.


In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.


Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Discuss the scientific nature of sociology.

    Sociologists use concepts to add simplicity and as a way of classifying their subject. Concepts act as guidelines and can help to give a better understanding of a subject.

  2. What Is The Relevance Of Emile Durkheim For Our Understanding Of The Human World ...

    One thing that hasn't changed, is that the idea of the collective was unpopular at the time, sociologists such as Simmel have always argued that the individual has more of a role to play than Durkheim suggests, and this argument is still popular now.

  1. Outline and assess critically the contribution that positivist ...

    Smart (1990) does not encourage research in to female crime because it would simply highlight already existing gender assumptions. Rather to be a truly objective science it should take account of both genders. However as positivist criminologies like to control for confounding variables it is unlikely to pursue this course.

  2. Examine W.E.B. Dubois' sociology. Should he be considered a founding father of sociology?

    He also provided the base upon which further race and race related research was built. Dubois produced an interventionist social science, a very powerful and significant tool for the black struggle even today. Given all of the above, Dubois' was not well recognized for his work and the invaluable contribution that he made to the sociology and the social sciences.

  1. The Contribution Sport Makes to Society

    It aims to enhance the quality of life for young people in these countries by giving them the opportunity to work with sports focused grass routes organisations and use sport to engage and empower them about life skills, youth development and leadership education, HIV/AIDS education and awareness, health and hygiene, gender and disability barriers Gardiner (2006)

  2. Identify the main premises of the interpretative tradition in sociology and the methodological prescriptions ...

    Weber differentiated these four different types of meaningful actions. Those actions which are in the nature of rational expediencies are the most understandable types in the scale of rationality. (Weber, in Gerth & Mills: 1948) Research methodology As regard to epistemology, where quantitative research is very much influenced by a natural science approach, qualitative researchers are more influenced by interpretativism.

  1. "Compare and evaluate Durkheim and Tonnies' accounts of social integration in modern societies"

    Durkheim uses his theory of 'Organic Solidarity' to describe characteristics of contemporary industrialised society. Durkheim claims that similar to the way in which every organ in the body performs a different function, every group within society also performs a different function; and although every 'function' is different, every organ/group is dependent on another to ensure survival.

  2. What Factors Distinguish criminological positivism from classicism.

    The human subject has no moral responsibility consensus orientated. Classicalist view on human nature, as humans is hedonistic, free-free willing, rational, morally responsible for their own behaviour, The distinguish factor here is that both schools of theory have different prospective on the human subject the positivist says humans have no moral responsibility because their actions are driven by biological or psychological and social factors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work