• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.

Middle

In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Discuss the scientific nature of sociology.

    Sociologists use concepts to add simplicity and as a way of classifying their subject. Concepts act as guidelines and can help to give a better understanding of a subject.

  2. Undertake an analysis of the extent the classical sociological theories of Durkheim, Marx and ...

    To conclude on the three key perspectives they broadly cover many social issues that deal with conflict in society, economic development and the usefulness of bureaucracy. These three key thinkers in the sociological world have led to great advancements in the field of organisational behaviour.

  1. Emile Durkheim wanted to show that sociology could be a rigorous scientific discipline that ...

    colleagues; the closest subject to sociology at the time would have been philosophy. Why then did Durkheim decide to study the somewhat unknown quantity of society? Philosophy, at least as far as Durkheim was concerned, seemed to be too far removed from the issues of the day.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    In place of hierarchy and centralization, NSMs experiment with radical democratic internal structures, open meetings, and positive discrimination towards the oppressed (eg Hulsberg 1988:120). If much of their development occurs in submerged networks, on occasion they rally together using the characteristic means of short-term mass mobilization (Offe 1985).

  1. Outline and assess critically the contribution that positivist ...

    Radical criminologies provide a possible explanation of why positivist criminologies miss hidden crime. They accept the definitions of crime at face value rather than looking at who does the labeling and why certain behaviours are labelled as criminal. It is the act of getting caught which results in the attachment of criminal labels (Muncie & McLaughlin 2004).

  2. What Is The Relevance Of Emile Durkheim For Our Understanding Of The Human World ...

    Understanding and perhaps solving societies' inequalities has become a central theme in sociology. Durkheim also assumed that the new form of solidarity bought about by laws represented the opinions of the whole, this is too simplistic because in the 1900's and 21st century, people do not accept the laws and forms of punishment as representing their views (Giddens 1978).

  1. Marx and Durkheim agreed about the nature of the problems of industrial capitalist society ...

    Marx argued that "Capitalism is inherently a class system in which class relations are characterised by conflict" (Giddens, 2001, p12). In Marx's view, the bourgeoisie were able to generate profit by exploiting the proletariat through oppressive devaluation of skilled labour and its' experience.

  2. A research project into the perceptions of graffiti by certain individuals and groups can ...

    In turn, Kelling and Coles (1996) suggested that the political climate of the 1960s and 70s led to lighter punishment for relatively minor offenders, and so the threat of punishment decreased. However, Taylor (2001) suggests that in terms of empirical data the 'broken windows' thesis does not provide a strong

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work