• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically examine the contribution of Emile Durkheim to the scientific study of society. David Emile Durkheim was a brilliant sociologist , born in 1858 in France and made his great contribution to sociology with his four major works: the division of labor in society(1893), the rules of sociological method(1895), suicide(1897) and the elementary forms of the religious life(1912)(Jones,1986 ). There were two main theories influenced Durkheim's works significantly. Firstly, Comte's perspective on scientific methodology helped Durkheim to investigate society with scientific method; secondly, the expression of debates on the problem of individualism in France after the revolution (Morrison, 1995). Auguste Comte was a French philosopher who held the view of positivism, mainly influenced Durkheim's works (Craib, 1997). Comte stated the definition of positivism as a scientific movement in the purpose of extending the range of investigation with scientific method to the study of society (Morrison, 1995). Another concept in Comet's work is society as a whole, which also influenced Durkheim significantly. 'Society as a whole' means that every part of a society should be seen and studied as a whole and associated with all other parts of the society-individuals can not be separable from society (Craib, 1997). Despite the theories mentioned above, Durkheim intended to differentiate sociology from biology and psychology especially psychology (Craib, 1997). ...read more.

Middle

In addition to 'constraint', Lukes (1973) argued that Durkheim extended the concept of constraint too far and claimed that constraint is too narrow as a criterion of social facts to define all the methods that Durkheim used to see the individual affected by social factors. The concept of social facts was examined mainly between distinguishing from sociology and psychology, and relationship between the social and individual. The next two parts will turn to examine the suicide and the division of labor in society. Suicide is Durkheim's third major sociological work published in 1897 (Morrison, 1995).[Microsoft2] Throughout his works, all of those topics are the basic theories for suicide, which seems to be a phenomenon that is associated with the individual and its ramifying functions (Durkheim, 1951). Lukes (1973) stated that Durkheim's suicide was a primary attempt that combined many earlier idea and findings theoretically and systematically, and concerned suicide as a social phenomenon. According to Durkheim (1951), suicide can not be explained by its individual forms. Therefore, the formulation of a social theory of suicide led him to focus on the cause of suicide within the framework of sociology, rather than in the psychological states of individuals (Morrison, 1995). Thus, this was a shift from psychological to sociological examination of suicide. ...read more.

Conclusion

Durkheim turned to seeking how social solidarity varies in different societies and solidarity can be showed in two ways, those are 'mechanical' and 'organic' (Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). In the mechanical societies, individual is directly connected with society and there are no differences between the individual conscience and the collective conscience (Jones, 1986). That is to say, the relation between individual and society is that individual can not be distinct from the collective as a whole and there is no individual autonomy (Morrison, 1973). In contrast to mechanical solidarity, organic societies shows that labor is specialized in different part of society and individuals connected to each other more than in the mechanical society(Calhoun and Gerteis, 2007). This reveals that individuals turn to rely on each other and become more dependent on specialized economic functions (Morrison, 1973). In conclusion, although Durkheim's social facts are ambiguous in some criteria of characteristics, his contribution of introducing a new subject matter, social facts, into sociology can not be ignored. Moreover, Durkheim maintained that social facts were objective and should be seen as things that were external to individual and independently. Furthermore, he distinguished sociology with psychology that is the matter Comte did not realize. His 'suicide' was the application of social facts and also suicide itself should be considered as a social fact. Therefore, Durkheim's contribution is valuable to sociology and also enriches the social science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Discuss the scientific nature of sociology.

    Sociologists use concepts to add simplicity and as a way of classifying their subject. Concepts act as guidelines and can help to give a better understanding of a subject.

  2. Undertake an analysis of the extent the classical sociological theories of Durkheim, Marx and ...

    However, Durkheim does state that the biggest social problem is finding the correct balance between differentiation and social integration. An example of this theory is the introduction of groups into the industry by allowing for groups people can still have differentiation within there job yet still integrate with their peers.

  1. Emile Durkheim wanted to show that sociology could be a rigorous scientific discipline that ...

    colleagues; the closest subject to sociology at the time would have been philosophy. Why then did Durkheim decide to study the somewhat unknown quantity of society? Philosophy, at least as far as Durkheim was concerned, seemed to be too far removed from the issues of the day.

  2. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    If they have "class" roots, these are to be found in sections of the new professional middle class, in "marginalized" or "peripheral" sectors and sometimes in parts of the old middle class (Offe 1985; Eder 1985). In Melucci's view, "The actors in these conflicts are no longer social classes, that

  1. Outline and assess critically the contribution that positivist ...

    white collar simply remain unmentioned. It is those who get caught and are labelled who appear in the analysis of positivist theories. Positivist research as well as labeling the lower classes as criminal and therefore missing much hidden crime, conduct research which is predominantly based on men.

  2. What Is The Relevance Of Emile Durkheim For Our Understanding Of The Human World ...

    Understanding and perhaps solving societies' inequalities has become a central theme in sociology. Durkheim also assumed that the new form of solidarity bought about by laws represented the opinions of the whole, this is too simplistic because in the 1900's and 21st century, people do not accept the laws and forms of punishment as representing their views (Giddens 1978).

  1. A research project into the perceptions of graffiti by certain individuals and groups can ...

    All participants will be given the choice as to the length and location of the interviews, and are free to say what they choose under the protection of anonymity. The interviews will be recorded and then analysed by all the researchers at a later date.

  2. Marx and Durkheim agreed about the nature of the problems of industrial capitalist society ...

    Everything in society is dominated by the cash 'nexus', including labour which becomes another commodity to be bought and sold" (Anderson et al, 1987, p5). Marx argued that the capitalist property-owners form a ruling class, whom Marx called the bourgeoisie, employers of wage-labour, the property-less working class, whom Marx labelled the proletariat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work