• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does realism or liberalism better explain the core dynamics of the international system?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Does realism or liberalism better explain the core dynamics of the international system? Discuss in light of evidence from the 19th and 20th centuries. The international system is a complex game with various key players ranging from states to multinational corporations to non-governmental organisations. Throughout the development of the international system, there have been various significant events that have led to the current state of affairs and in turn, scholars have developed various theories in an attempt to understand and analyse international relations. The two most prevalent theories are realism and liberalism. Both positivist theories, they exist as polar opposites and offer two different perspectives on the behaviour and relations between states. Some argue that realism best explains these relations and the core dynamics of the international system but this essay will argue that it is in fact liberalism which better explains it. This will be argued in light of evidence from the 19th and 20th centuries which will show that although realism has played a role in the evolution of the international system, it is liberalism which has been dominant in explaining historical global events. ...read more.

Middle

It has had many successes including settling territorial disputes, punishing war crimes through the use of war crime tribunals like those following the Cambodian War and it deserves credit for the fact that there have been no major world wars since it?s creation. The end of the Cold War is arguably one of the most significant events in the history of the International Relations discipline and during it?s course, realism was the dominant theoretical system in terms of providing an explanation for it, however, realists failed to predict or anticipate the end of the war and it?s following peaceful developments into a new era. The realist theory of power balancing does help to explain the clear potential for a third world war; regardless of international institutions like the UN, the Soviet Union or the US could have easily acted as they pleased. However, it has been argued by thinkers such as Moravcsik that the realist power balancing was only temporary and served to prop up the status quo but it was actually a change in the preferences of the state which led to the eventual end of the conflict. ...read more.

Conclusion

These examples directly contrast with the realist view, which assumes that all individuals are selfish by nature and incapable of cooperation. If human beings are inherently selfish and egoistic to the degree that self-interest trumps all morality then how can such positive developments for mankind have occurred? So continues the debate as to which theory best explains the core dynamics of the international system. It is clear that there arguments for and against both schools; some say that realism is the way things actually are whilst liberalism is an ideal world. This essay has concluded that liberalism has provided a more clear explanation than realism throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, however, international relations is a work in progress and as we continue to study the field, we will continue to ask questions about foreign policy and international issues in order to improve our understanding of the system today. Whichever theory one chooses to side with it is clear that they are both capable of providing robust and noteworthy explanations for the way the international system has worked thus far. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Relations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Relations essays

  1. Using your understanding of classical realism, explain the US invasion of Iraq in 2003.

    Moreover, the key assumptions of realism, known as statism, survival and self-help, all correlate with the causing factors of the invasion of Iraq. Statism holds that states are the most important actors and "sovereignty [the authority to make and enforce laws] is its distinguishing traits" (Dunne and Schmidt, 2008:100).

  2. How 'realistic' is realism?

    Despite these convincing criticisms, realist theorists continue to argue for the existence of a balance of power within the contemporary international system. Some suggest that rogue states such as Iran and North Korea seek nuclear weapons so that they can protect themselves from more powerful states like the US.

  1. Alliance system prior to World War 1

    Thus, in a multi-polar system, because the structure is so fluid and dynamic, the policies are more rigid, and each state is forced to shape its interest to create greater harmonization to achieve a high degree of homogeneity with the allies.

  2. What international factors, with particular reference to the United States, have accounted for the ...

    Therefore "Since the end of the Cold War, Washington has been faced with the not inconsiderable task of designing an approach on Kashmir that took account both of its diminished interest in the South Asian region and, at the same time, of the need to find the middle ground among

  1. Globalisation is always good - Discuss

    Mandle recognises the harmful side effects of globalisation and argues that its proponents have paid too little attention to these matters, and claims that more should be done to ameliorate painful but necessary dislocations. These researchers find the basic problem of globalisation, how to address "the damage that is done

  2. United Nations : An Adovcate of Peace and International Development?

    a new Secretary General and on the admission of new Members to the UN. Doctrine, Strategy and Decision-Making for Peace Operations (What the UN does for Peace and Security) 12. Preserving peace and security are the central purpose of the UN.

  1. Which balance of power system is more stable: Unipolarity, Bipolarity or Multipolarity?

    However, we saw alliances in the past two World Wars, so some would argue that it did not maintain a stable international system but, there are many other factors now that allow Multipolarity to be a system which can promote peace and stability.

  2. International Relations Theory. The following analysis will outline the influence of the theories of ...

    In realist view, the world is uncertain and dangerous. Realists assume that all states have some military power and no state knows what its neighbors? intentions are. Waltz says, ?Because some states may at any time use force, all states must be prepared to do so - or live

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work