• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine International Intervention in the Case of the Sierra Leonean Civil War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine International Intervention in the Case of the Sierra Leonean Civil War According to the UN, 2005 saw the end of a highly successful peacekeeping mission in Sierra Leone (UN, Year in Review: 2005, 2006). The United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone (UNAMSIL), the UN boldly asserts "oversaw a feeble process... demonstrating how the world body can respond to the needs and demands of countries emerging from conflict in a rapidly changing global environment" (UN, Year in Review: 2005, 2006). Similarly, the mission was seen as a good war for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who championed intervention, as was British involvement in Former Yugoslavia. UNAMSIL lasted for 6 years, long after the initial conflict was resolved. The Sierra Leonean Civil War actually began in 1991, as rebels (supported by Liberia's Charles Taylor) began seizing Diamond mines, collecting supporters along the way (Gberie, 2005). The goals of the RUF were sometimes blurred, and with no triadic nexus, ethnic conflict or obvious oppression to speak of, the Sierra Leonean civil war would prove a difficult one to understand, let alone tackle. International intervention is by no means a modern phenomenon, however, since the end of the Cold War the meaning, understanding and implementation of International intervention has changed rapidly (Fassin & Pandolfi, 2010), with ever growing emphasis on the "Responsibility to Protect" (Evans & Sahnoun, 2002). International intervention is broadly separated in two categories: coercive intervention and co-operative intervention, however many scholars recognise the possibility, or rather evolution of a third, hybrid category. ...read more.

Middle

With no personal gains to be made, and no offensive mandate, they are often a welcome sight in a conflict, at least by civilians. In the time after the ECOMOG troops had left, the rebels had done well in seizing the opportunity. Within a few months, 18,000 UN peacekeepers had been deployed, the majority from the ECOWAS nations (Adebajo, 2008). However, the UN still failed to adequately equip the peacekeepers, just as it had ECOMOG. Furthermore the mission details were complex and misunderstood by many. Once again, also, a power struggle arose as some senior peacekeepers accused the Nigerian members of the mission of colluding to prolong the war, so that they may benefit from the illicit diamond trade, and whilst no proof was found, the damage to the missions reputation was done. It is imperative that a peacekeeping mission is seen, at all times, to be above and beyond the deplored violence of a war's combatants. (Goulding, 451-64) It is also imperative that the peacekeepers are seen to have a stronger military force than the combatants, otherwise their deterrent potential is diminished. However, in this case, the presence of the UN Peacekeeping force did more harm than good. The RUF asserted that the peace accord made no mention of the UN sending the force, and as such would not adhere to their involvement. The peacekeepers would soon find out that the "biggest problem in implementing peace accords in civil wars is getting parties to live up to their commitments" (Stedman, 1996). ...read more.

Conclusion

If it is so, that the outcome of intervention justifies the means, then surely the sum of International Intervention in the Sierra Leonean Civil War is justified. Effective, also, as although still one of the poorest nations on Earth, Sierra Leone has undoubtedly found the route to democracy, and has shown no real sign of slipping back into conflict. This is not to say, however, that the International Intervention was without criticism. Sierra Leone was an unprecedented case in when the conflict began, lacking in clear lines of division. Perhaps mindful of a public relations disaster, or perhaps sensitive to the history of the Sierra Leonean people (particularly the Krio), The United Nations was happy to delegate Intervention to ECOWAS. ECOWAS was formed for economic purposes, with little experience in military intervention and this was problematic from the very beginning. It would have better for all involved if the UN had taken the reins after the Abidjan Peace Accord. It should no longer be acceptable for the UN to delegate peacekeeping missions to the nearest regional organisation. Interventionists failed, for far too long, to see the link between the diamonds of Sierra Leone, the international community, and the conflict. Had the embargo been placed sooner, the Civil War could have ended years before it did. As stated earlier, the Sierra Leonean Civil War saw many means of intervention used, some more effective than others. What cannot be tolerated, however, is the half-hearted approach the United Nations took to intervening early on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. How effective is international law?

    Whilst the US viewed it as the instrument of Communism and the Third World states, acting against its national interests and democracy. Some claim that the Cold War froze the ICJ out and could arguably been effective for twelve years.

  2. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    Debates have raged about whether Khatami is indeed a moderate (this writer has argued that the reputation is largely undeserved), but there is no question that Iran's people are fed up with theocratic politics. Lay intellectuals, like the scholar Hosein Dabbagh (known by his pen name, Abdol Karim Soroush), argue

  1. The Failure of the Israeli - Palestinian peace process and Israeli oppression

    In October, 1999, the Israeli army declared their lands-some 100,000 dunams of land (25,000 acres) south of Hebron-as a "closed military area." (In fact, this was only one of 16 orders closing vast tracts of land throughout the West Bank at that time.)

  2. What is more important in international mediation power or impartiality?

    42), can be seen as a focal point of tension within the study of mediation that theorists then begin to debate as to what lengths this should be done. For example, Moore writes in contrast, that mediation itself should be impartial with no authoritative decision making (Zartman, 2007: 166).

  1. What was the Cold War and why did it end?

    However, this question remains open. The United States and the Soviet Union remained superpowers and by the 1950's both possessed nuclear weapons which added a dangerous aspect to the Cold War.7 Another important element was the differing ideological standpoints from both of these countries.

  2. Globalisation: fair trade

    Both the Times and the Guardian reported the encouraging sales figures of the product, both highlight the government's decision to provide the organisation with �12 million to subsidise its products. The Independent inform that when the movement first began people were humoured by its notion that it could infiltrate "the

  1. To what extent does a feminist perspective require the re-structuring of the study of ...

    the lenses through which certain activities are seen by IR that obscure the work done by women, for example, sex workers, diplomatic wives, outside military bases (Murphy, 1996: 517 and Steans, 2003: 428). Enloe not only wanted to take women's lives seriously, but also to move women from the margins

  2. The Effect of Nationalist Ideology on Violence in Yugoslavia in the 1990s

    As Mann states: ?this collective memory, based on a real and recent historical core, then amplified by organic nationalism, (came to) boost? ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia ? but only after serious political tensions had emerged? (Mann 2005: 362). Essentially, the conflation of the nation, ethnically defined, and the state in nationalist ideology politicizes ethnicity and creates an objectified ?other?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work