• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the role and importance of Federalism in the Constitutional system of government.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Robin Walden Politics in the USA Tutor: Donna Jackson Explain the role and importance of Federalism in the Constitutional system of government. When the founding fathers constructed the American constitution in 1787, Federalism was absolutely crucial to the basis of the revision of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution itself was testament to the Founding Fathers' will to implement a central government, for the Articles of Confederation had proven ineffective in providing a unifying leadership. The system of Federalism addressed this problem whilst remaining wary of the possible abuse of this authority, represented through the political power distributed to the States. This preservation of democracy represents the Founding Fathers biggest concern and this legacy of freedom and liberty remains today as essential to the American character. Not only was it important to separate the powers to protect democracy, but cultural and political differences between the states demanded that local governments oversee local issues. The changing role and definition of Federalism from 1789 to present is also important to consider, with special consideration required in the transformation it has undertaken in the twentieth century. Federalism has always been at the cornerstone of democracy in the United States and this surely remains the case today, for the American people have always identified themselves as an American and as an American of a particular state. ...read more.

Middle

He is surely referring to the fact that there is no one overwhelming authority, instead there is a series of authorities between state and central government, discouraging and indeed making improbable, any abuse of power. Samuel H. Beer believes that not only does Federalism discourage tyranny but "the social plurism of the general government will counteract tendencies toward a factional abuse of power in the subordinate governments."13, thereby acting as a check on the system, reducing further the risk of abuse. The power distributed to the States ensure that power "cannot legitimately be centralized or concentrated without breaking the structure and spirit of the constitution"14, once more ensuring that no kind of autocracy could be implemented established within America. The powers of the States are substantial; with the most important role being the ratification of constitutional amendments. As long as the States remain a part of the Constitutional process, there is no possibility that their influence will disappear, or diminish significantly; their rights and responsibilities are constitutionally protected and for this reason the role of the States is of huge importance. This example conforms to and adheres to Tocqueville's views that the republic is well protected through Federalism, once more deflecting the possibility of tyranny. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the role and importance of Federalism to the Constitutional form of government must not be understated. The significance of the separation of powers is based in the Founding Fathers fear of tyrannical, undemocratic government, and their will to stop any such government emerging in America. Also of motivation in the Constitution's construction was the will to preserve the individual states identity through their self-governance within this Federalist system; Federalism's capacity to allow both overall and individual government is essential to this. Despite the modern reduction in the influence of State government, the Constitution preserves the states' rights, ensuring their influence will remain and they will act as a check on the central government. Whether or not the Founding Fathers would concur with the current state of Federalism in America is debateable, yet the circumstances of the twentieth century undeniably demanded the increase in the role of Federalism. Current intergovernmental relations may revert to a more 'classical' form of federalism as and when circumstances allow, yet the fact that these debates remain underlines the continuing importance of Federalism. The separation of powers and consequent protection of democracy remains essential to the American political system, and the Founding Fathers legacy remains today in the form of Federal government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Examine the role of Gandhi in the development of Indian nationalism

    He called for boycotts of elections, schools and courts. He asked all Indian government officials to resign from their positions which a number few arrested and imprisoned for. This was linked by Muslim no-tax initiatives. In 1922 however Gandhi called for an abrupt end to the non cooperation pact to the surprise of most due to the out break of violence where 22 police officers where killed.

  2. The Parliamentary Roller coaster ride: Rise or Fall? Australia, as stated in our ...

    The change will move away from the dominance of political parties in setting the agenda and away from partisanship in the implementation and monitoring of public policy. The peace movement, the women's movement, the aboriginal movement, and the environment movement have been broadly responsible for setting the agenda in major areas of public policy irrespective of the party in office.

  1. Compare and contrast the views of Confucianism, Taoism (Daoism), and Legalism on the "the ...

    a sense of the shame, and abide by what is required of them."(2.3)5. A good Tao emperor, according to Lao-Tzu, is an emperor who governs as little as possible, keeping the natural way, "laissez-faire" the people. The ruler should take care to satisfy the populace because when the people are

  2. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two philosophers who thought extensively on the subject ...

    Locke discusses how in such a government, the ruler works for themselves, and not for the benefit of the people, in which dissolution can occur. If the leader or the government neglects its obligations, the government is probable to failure.

  1. Evaluate the responsibilities of the different levels of government in the UK and explain ...

    The Heath government of 1971 stated that: "A vigorous local democracy means that authorities must be given real functions; with powers of decision and the ability to take action without being subjected to excessive regulation by central government through financial or other controls.

  2. Sovereignty and Democracy in the European Union.

    which was never real, and which has become even more improbable with the imminent prospect of enlargement. But people are right to feel uncertain about the destiny of the EU, because it is genuinely unclear. Above all and this is the central point people do not feel they have any control over it through the democratic process.

  1. European Union: Council of Ministers.

    While it�s unquestionable that the mills of the EU grind exceedingly slowly, Gil-Robles is confident that in time�measured, he hopes, in years rather than light years�the significance and effectiveness of the European Parliament will finally dawn on the electorate. Voters in the European Union�those of them, at least, who can

  2. To what extent was slavery the cause of the American Civil War?

    However just because it was in the North's economic interest to keep the south within the union there is little evidence that economic benefit was what pushed Lincoln to declare war. Such a motivation is unmentioned it his rhetoric and seems all too superficial a reason when other issues were at stake.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work