• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways, if any, is the UK Parliament more than the instrument of party leaders?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In what ways, if any, is the UK Parliament more than the instrument of party leaders? In 1976, Lord Hailsham coined the term 'elective dictatorship' to describe the political dominance of the elected party in British government. As such, the UK Parliament is considered to have become an instrument of party leaders. Yet, it still retains its own significance as a crucial body in British government. This will be established by identifying structures within the UK Parliament that demonstrate its powers to be independent of party leaders. The British Parliament consists of the triumvirate of the monarch, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons. Over the years, power has moved from the monarch to the Houses of Parliament; within the Parliament, power has shifted from the House of Lords to the House of Commons (Baldwin 2005). The House of Commons is largely dominated by the majority party. The rise in two-party politics, as well as the first-past-the-post electoral system, delivers large majorities in the Commons. Once a majority party is elected, the monarch asks the party to formulate a government. ...read more.

Middle

On 8 March 1979, at the end of a confidence debate following the so-called winter of discontent, enough of the opposition parties united to defeat the majority Labour government by 311 votes to 310. The Conservative motion carried by one vote precipitated the May 1979 general election and brought the Conservative Thatcher administration to power. The opposition parties have a number of additional resources and functions that can be used to influence the Commons. Each year, 20 days in the House of Commons are assigned opposition days: on 17 of these days, the motion is chosen by the main opposition party and on the other 3 days, the motion is chosen by the third largest party. In addition, the opposition can also persuade the Speaker to grant an adjournment debate on urgent issues. It is also traditional for an opposition MP to chair the influential Public Accounts Committee. With these resources, the opposition also provides a check on the elective dictatorship that might otherwise be rampant in the Commons. Rejection by the House of Lords The Commons is often the focus of interest on major occasions - a Budget Statement, a motion of censure on a minister or the government, an emergency, or the decision to go to war. ...read more.

Conclusion

will be close, the Executive instead of being so arrogant will have to be nice, to listen, to keep everyone on board, and that will change the atmosphere all to the good. Some proper democracy will come back into the Commons and we need it badly." More than an Instrument of Party Leaders The Parliament is inevitably led by the majority party and its party leaders. Yet, on the important issues, the mechanisms in the Parliament react in the form of backbench rebellions, dissent by the opposition parties, and obstruction by the House of Lords. In some rare instances, a hung parliament occurs, signalling the need for party leaders of different parties to reconcile differences and coordinate decisions to best serve the interests of a larger portion of the British public. Elective dictatorship is an inaccurate term to describe the UK Parliament. A dictatorship is not checked by other powers. Yet, in the UK Parliament, the party leaders are subject to constant scrutiny. Without the support of his own party, tacit approval by the opposition, consent by the Lords, and confidence of the public, the party leader is powerless. The UK Parliament is much more than an instrument of party leaders. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. The Composition of The House of Lords.

    This right is ancient but the conditions under which an appeal can be made have become closely defined in statute over the last century.

  2. Should the House of Lords be fully elected? How would election of the ...

    Even if there were clashes, they would be an expression of the democratic process, which made them possible. The present system of appointment is also absurd as it allows politicians to appoint their own watchdog. Even the first-past-the-post voting system (also known as simple majority voting)

  1. Report on the Hunting Ban Act. This report aims to assess in great ...

    and the second by MP John McFall in 1995 (Milbourne 2003 p160). However, the LACS had greater success in local councils, in which several outlawed hunting on public land, "although these bans were later overruled by judicial review" (Milbourne 2003 p160).

  2. If social class no longer determines party allegiance in the UK, what does?

    They are already supporters of that party and the broadcast only reinforces their views (pp. 136-137). Denver (2003) presents a similar argument about the press. For him, there is evidence that people read certain newspapers, all of which are clearly partisan, in order to ensure and reinforce their party loyalties.

  1. DOES THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT STILL PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE CHECK ON EXECUTIVE POWER?

    An adjournment debate gives the opportunity to raise general or district issues, here again backbenchers may raise issues also. A private motion debate has eleven days pre sessions allocated also here backbenchers may raise issues. And finally emergency debates may be required but are rarely approved of by speakers.

  2. PC Debate

    Michael Foucault, in his work Knowledge and Power, explains his theory of how power is created and transferred throughout an 'economy' of discourse, 'it shows how power is transferred along conduits of dialogue according to the knowledge one has. Therefore, knowledge does not necessarily have to be true, but it

  1. Responsibility of ministers to Parliament

    did not, however, take heed of this advice when his department failed to provide the information required for a conclusive investigation.11 It is fair to say that the veracity of ministers is at the crux of a democracy. On the one hand, ministers, by definition, should know what is going on in their department.

  2. Examine the role of Gandhi in the development of Indian nationalism

    All members of this commission were British. This was regarded as highly insulting to the Indians and immediate protest was raised from all the important political parties. When the Simon Commission arrived they were greeted by masses of people armed with slogans and chants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work