• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Is it true to say that the British parliament is no longer truly sovereign?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is it true to say that the British parliament is no longer truly sovereign? Parliament, legally, consists of the House of Commons, The House of Lords and the monarchy. However, since the monarch today has only prerogative powers, and since 1911 the House of Lords has lost much of its power, sovereignty now rests largely with the House of Commons (Economist 1995, p25). The doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty is the idea that parliament is effectively the most powerful decision making body in the land. It can essentially be broken down into three elements: firstly that it has the ability to 'make or unmake any law' (Scully, 2003, p124), secondly that it cannot pass any laws which bind its successors, and thirdly, that any acts passed by Parliament cannot be questioned by the courts of law. There are many contemporary issues which have come to affect the sovereignty of the British Parliament. The rise of Brussels, the process of devolution, the power of the executive and the issue of globalisation, amongst other things, have all contributed to the erosion of parliamentary sovereignty. ...read more.

Middle

Another, more fundamental issue has arisen with the Britain's decision to join the European Community and later the European Union. Because of the supranational nature of the European Union, British membership has greatly affected the issue of parliamentary sovereignty. Britain now has to abide by rules and treaties set by the EU and European law which significantly hinder the UK's independence of action. In other words, the British Parliament cannot pass laws which contravene EU treaties and regulations and has to follow these rules at all times. The European Communities Act of 1972 created a situation where all EU regulations and laws instantly apply to the UK without the assent of Parliament. The Act also gives EU law precedence over the law of the UK (Jones, 2001, p302). This was seen most notably in 1990 when a law was passed by the British Parliament to prevent the practice of 'quota-hopping' by Spanish fishermen. The EU blocked this law because it went against EU legislation on the freedom of movement of workers. (Fisher(ed), 2003, p124). The decisions of Parliament are no longer truly final, as other bodies, namely the European Court of Justice can set these decisions aside. ...read more.

Conclusion

Globalisation has also played a part in the erosion of parliamentary sovereignty. Multi national corporations have become so economically powerful that the richest of them have a higher Gross Domestic Output than many countries. They can effectively dictate demands to governments in return for financial rewards. Although this is more of a contingent factor than a constitutional one, it cannot be underestimated in the argument over national sovereignty. Although some believe that Parliament in Britain has never been truly sovereign for any long period of time, I feel that as the only publicly elected component of government, it should be the most powerful element in a democratic system of rule. The House of Commons is used by Cabinets to pursue their policies which may not be even in the public interest, the EU, the most powerful elements of which are not publicly elected, dictates to Parliament to a certain extent on a number of issues; and private businesses push their own agendas upon the government. All in all, I believe that the only elected organ of Britain's government is no longer truly sovereign and has become essentially a talking shop and rubber stamp for government and EU legislation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically assess Rhodes' (1997) argument that 'Policy networks of resource dependent organisations are a ...

    3 star(s)

    Ham (1999) and Webster (1998 sited in Kay) recognise Labour's change in style and see their increased co-operation with medical professional's and "commitment to not change PCG structures for at least 10 years as, an attempt to re-establish trust with the medical profession."

  2. Where does decision-making power lie in the British executive?

    With the increasing prominence of the prime ministerial thesis, it could be said that the Cabinet government thesis has been on decline. Yet, the Cabinet thesis still presents meaningful insights into the British executive. Most importantly, the Cabinet significantly influences how much power the Prime Minister can wield.

  1. How does the media affect British politics?

    There is no great crime in lending money but Mandelson's mistake was to apply for a bank loan to cover the remaining cost of his 475,000 home. Mandelson and Robinson were both criticised in the Commons for breaching what ministers called the 'procedure' of announcing such matters.

  2. Institutionalised racism and how it manifests in contemporary Britain.

    In an interview with ePolitix.com, Sir Bill Morris said society faces a battle to prevent the government pandering to people who are "quite frankly racist". He however also stated there was collective cabinet responsibility. He stated, "They have collective responsibility. We have a Cabinet government, so I hold government responsible.

  1. How successful is British Drug Policy?

    As a tool it has shown much success in other areas of social life. Counter to Blackman's view, we need to take a different approach to drugs education rather than abandoning it all together. Just because the hammer is being used the wrong way round does not mean that it will not hammer a nail if used correctly.

  2. Critically discuss the degree to which Parliament holds the Executive accountable

    Important bills can go to the full House as happened in the Maastricht bill. Once out of the committee stage if there are amendments the bill goes into a report stage where the committee report and table their amendments for approval.

  1. Sovereignty and Democracy in the European Union.

    We should not be too self-critical. The EU can take credit for remarkable accomplishments across a very wide field. With its Member States, the EU accounts for more than half of all official international development assistance, and some 66% of all grant aid.

  2. Scottish Devolution

    When Scotland was given its own parliament and Donald Dewar became First Minister of Scotland in his statement on the legislative programme for the Executive he made the statement of ââScottish solutions for Scottish problemsââ(bbcnews,1999).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work