• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the US Supreme Court the most powerful branch in the Government?

Extracts from this document...


The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and therefore is also the most powerful. It was the only court to be created from the Constitution which was implemented in 1789 under the Judicial Act. "Article III, §1, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The Supreme Court of the United States was created in accordance with this provision and by authority of the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789 (1 Stat. 73). It was organized on February 2, 1790."[1] The intentions of the court are to interpret the US constitution. As seen in the question there are other branches of government, the Supreme Court comes under the judicial section and the other 2 are the executive Branch which includes most notably the President of the United States. The Third and last branch is the legislative branch that includes Congress. In Article III, Section 2 of the constitution the power and responsibility of the Supreme Court is written and this is the wording; “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ...read more.


However, this view has changed over the years from the people and the majority believe that it is too powerful rather than the weakest. The start of the U.S. Constitution is; 'We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America'. The argument here is that 'we the people' don?t actually elect the judges that sit in the Supreme Court. They are only simply appointed but they are also appointed by the president that the people of the United States elect. It can be argued that it is undemocratic to not let the people pick and choose what the majority wish seeing as the Judges make massive decisions that affect the people. This is the view of Robert F. Bauer in The Washington Post "The power of Supreme Court justices today is epic in scale. The cases they hear involve the most difficult and contentious questions before the nation. An alphabetical list would begin with abortion and proceed through campaign finance, church-state relations, euthanasia, pornography, presidential selection and voting rights. And once appointed and confirmed, the members of the court who engage these momentous issues are able to do so for as long as they please."[3] The last line in the quote tells us that the Judges can be in power for life. ...read more.


Chief Justice Marshall wrote the opinion in the case, ?Marbury was entitled to the commission, the Supreme Court did not have the power to force Madison to deliver the commission. He reasoned that the Judiciary Act of 1789, the act written by Congress which authorized the Supreme Court t to issue such writs conflicted with Constitution so the law was unconstitutional. He said that when ordinary laws conflict with the constitution, they must be struck down or made ?null and void.? This is called judicial review. In effect, he wrote that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and the courts --- especially the Supreme Court --- are the ultimate ?deciders? of what is constitutional.?[4] This was the first case that the Supreme Court said they had the right to strike down a law if they believed that is was unconstitutional. They in theory gave themselves power of Judicial Review and made the court more powerful and brought the power up to par with the Executive and Legislative branches of the government. It has been argued that the Supreme Court acts unconstitutionally itself when it exercises Judicial Review. ________________ [1] http://www.supremecourt.gov/about/briefoverview.aspx accessed 14 December 2012. [2] Donald P, Kommers, John E. Finn, Gary J. Jacobsohn, American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes, (3rd edn, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2009) 11 [3] Robert F. Bauer, A Court Too Supreme For Our Good, The Washington Post, Washington, 2005. [4]https://shuspace.shu.ac.uk/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tabGroup=courses&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fcontent%2FcontentWrapper.jsp%3Fcontent_id%3D_3733448_1%26displayName%3DLinked%2BFile%26course_id%3D_263121_1%26navItem%3Dcontent%26attachment%3Dtrue%26href%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.landmarkcases.org%252Fmarbury%252Fhome.html accessed 15 December 2012. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Systems section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Systems essays

  1. Essay plan. How does the US Constitution protect the individual citizen against the abuse ...

    In this way although the majority of power in the uk now resides with Parliment and Governmnet the queen remains the head of state. The US have a Republican Constitution where the head of state is the president who has far greater power then the current queen.

  2. Ministerial Responsibility

    "The agency was created by the merger of the Scottish Vocational Education Council and the Scottish Examination Board under the Education (Scotland) Act 1996 to oversee the qualifications offered and awarded in Scotland" (Clarence, 2002). It is the national body in Scotland responsible for the development, accreditation, assessment and certification of qualifications other than degrees (sqa.org.uk).

  1. Under what conditions are parliamentary forms of government more appropriate than presidential forms?

    Therefore, in the set of circumstances where a state needs fast and effective implementation of new policies, the parliamentary approach to government is clearly more appropriate. As this essay has shown through the analysis of a number of circumstances, the parliamentary approach to government is significantly more appropriate than the presidential approach.

  2. Research Project - Efficiency of the parliament as a legislative branch in Russia.

    so that means that law about immunity must be revised, but very careful. The next issue in my opinion is the most important. It is the issue of opposition. In Russian parliament the majority belongs only to one party - United Russia.

  1. Regionalism in China and India. In India regionalism is accommodated through the federal ...

    This causes the bureaucracy to delay policy implementation due to many different groups being involved.. Like India, China is also very large and diverse. Regionalism plays a large role in government. Chinas levels of government consist of province, country, and township. Regionalism in China is accommodated by a unitary system.

  2. The title question of this paper asks that we evaluate the degrees to which ...

    be seen as democratic we must further evaluate them in context with one another. A tale of two houses The United States Congress, given powers in the constitution, was to be a bicameral one. To ensure the supremacy of the people, the legislature was given sweeping powers to make and

  1. Influence of Super PACs on Romney Campaign

    30, 2012 (http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance/independent-expenditures/totals). Lauren Ohnesorge, ?The Problem With Too Much Advertising,? Triangle Business Journal, http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/2012/03/the-problem-with-too-much-advertising.html (Mar. 12, 2012). Larry Popelka, Obama and Romney Prove Oversize Ad Budgets Don?t Work, Bloomberg Business Week, http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-02/obama-and-romney-prove-oversize-ad-budgets-don-t-work (Nov. 2, 2012). Matea Gold, Melanie Mason, ?Effect of ?Super PACs? Proved to be Less Than Expected,? Los Angeles Times, Nov.

  2. The Sierra Clubs Organizational Repertoires. Over the course of the 20th century, the ...

    District Court, an injunction was again placed on construction of the ski resort, and finally in 1978, even though the case was technically unresolved, there was closure. That year, Congress added Mineral King to the boundaries of Sequoia National Park, completely ending the possibility of a ski resort, and preserving the pristine nature of Mineral King.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work